BREAKING.🚨 Judge Scott McAfee, a Fani Willis donor who once worked under the Fulton County DA, just upheld the criminal indictment against former President Donald Trump in Georgia. McAfee rejected the argument that Trump’s efforts to legally challenge the 2020 election were protected under the First Amendment. “The defense has not presented, nor is the Court able to find, any authority that the speech and conduct alleged is protected political speech,” McAfee wrote in his order. The Democratic Party has sought to “overturn” the results of presidential elections in 2000, 2004, and 2016. Democrats argued both Bush and Trump were “illegitimate” presidents and claimed the elections were “stolen.” The radical left’s incendiary rhetoric about Trump led to interruptions of the electoral college proceedings in 2017 and incited violent riots on J20 during Trump’s inauguration. Not a single, solitary Democrat has EVER been charged for seeking to “overturn” the results of an election. This is ELECTION INTERFERENCE posing as a legal case. It has nothing to do with the law and it has nothing to do with justice.
I didn’t even vote for Trump in 2016. I am far from being a fan of cult of personality politics. But this is blatant weaponization of the Justice system. I don’t shoot things through a prism of personalities, but more towards assaults on our institutions and rights. And this anti-Trump lawfare campaign is a massive threat to our Constitutional system of government. If the American people are not allowed to elect whom they see fit to lead the country, then we are not a free country. And even if you disdain Donald Trump (and I am no fan of his political style) you have to view things from the bigger picture angle and be dispassionate about it. Once you do that, you can see the biggest threat to America isn’t Donald Trump, but the people who will do literally anything to stop him.
@kylenabecker I thought you people loved this guy? Weird how any missed goose step results in excommunication from the cult. But cultists gonna cult, I guess.
@kylenabecker I bet those lips are still kissing that Fani...
@kylenabecker So bald for a 34 year old. A low T coward soy boy
@kylenabecker Election Interference
@kylenabecker No US court is going to give Trump a fair trial. Winning the 2024 election will be his only opportunity to pursue justice.
@kylenabecker Mind boggling just how corrupt the establishment is especially on the Democrat side
@kylenabecker How long did Democrats spend judge shopping and why are we actually watching this play out damn well knowing that all of these people are corrupt and out to get President Trump? At what point does SCOTUS strep in and we put an end to all of this lawfare?
According to the Code of Conduct, judges are mandated (not requested) to avoid "the appearance of impropriety." habeascorpus @habeascorp001 Are judges in the US mandated to avoid the appearance of impropriety? Grok @grok Yes, judges in the United States are mandated to avoid the appearance of impropriety. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges includes several canons that emphasize the importance of avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. For example, Canon 2A states that "A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary" (Code of Conduct for United States Judges, effective before March 12, 2019). This principle is further reinforced in the revised Code of Conduct, which, for the first time, explicitly defines the "appearance of impropriety" in Canon 2. The revised code states that "An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired" (Judicial Conference of the United States, 2009).