W "I will make certain declarations which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First, that Dr Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin White Paper. Second, Dr Wright is not the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto in the period 2008 to 2011. Third, Dr Wright is not the person who created the Bitcoin System. And, fourth, he is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software. Any further relief will be dealt with in my written judgment. I will extend time for filing any appellant's notice until 21 days after the form of order hearing, which will be appointed following the hand down of my written judgment and I ask the parties to seek to agree an order giving effect to what I have just stated."
@jack Complete and utter annihilation of @CalvinAyre's strategy for the last 10 years.
Of course if there were no copyright law, then Wright's claims could simply be laughed off or ignored. The real problem is the existence of copyright law. Unfortunately most Bitcoiners do not understand this and don't oppose IP law, so they are missing the real issue. It's not Wright who was the threat; it is copyright law.
@jack Now officially certified by a court of law:
@jack Thank you for fighting this cancer, Jack 🙏
@jack I look forward to Craig Wright's perjury trial 🔜