Semui.eth @iamSemui

Worth reading, and reading again. The value of a network increases with more participants. Participation increases when folks sense something meaningful is being built. And decentralization is strengthened by each additional participant.

6529 @punk6529

7 months ago

1/ On Losing Faith Is it over? Was it all a fever dream? Have we run out of steam? Is it time to pivot to AI for real this time? 2/ Everything is dead? BTC: DAT premiums down, nobody cares ETH: Stablecoin Alts: Crushed NFTs: Right click saved Meme coins: As expected tbh

437 514 3K 554K 1K

0 0 2 76 0

View Details

DappRadar @DappRadar

7 months ago

After seven years, it's time to say goodbye.

1K 511 5K 2.4M 701

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

@DappRadar Very sorry to hear this. Thank you for all that you have done for the space.

0 0 1 838 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

This was unimaginable just a few years ago

zerohedge @zerohedge

7 months ago

Taiwan's Central Bank To Explore Bitcoin Reserves, Pilot BTC Holdings zerohedge.com/crypto/taiwans…

30 100 757 100K 30

0 0 1 53 0

View Details

RΞY @reylarsdam

7 months ago

Any day creating art is a good one 👊🔥

61 92 552 13K 24

View Details

⛓ @chainszy

7 months ago

the best art this space has produced came from people who had no idea if anyone would buy it. they just made it because they had to. because the vision wouldn't leave them alone. because creating was the only way to process what they were feeling. that's the energy that builds culture. not calculated plays for engagement. not trend chasing. not trying to figure out what the market wants. just pure expression. pure vision. and somehow that's the thing that resonates most. because humans can tell the difference between art made to sell and art made because it had to exist. one feels empty even when it's technically impressive. the other feels alive even when it's rough around the edges. collect the thing that's alive. everything else is just decoration

35 32 192 9K 12

View Details

Documenting Saylor @saylordocs

7 months ago

“If I put $100 in Bitcoin in 2010 I’d have $2.8B now.” No. If you bought $100 of Bitcoin in 2010 and watched it go to: $1k → $100k → $1.7M and did nothing Then watched $1.7M go to $170k and still did nothing Then watched $170k go to $110M and still did nothing Then watched $110M wither to $18M and still did nothing Then watched $18M surge to $390M and still did nothing Then watched $390M deteriorate to $85M Then watched $85M climb to $1.6B and still did nothing Then watched $1.6B shrink to $390M and still did nothing Then watched $390M surge to $2.8B and then for some reason finally decided to do something… Then yes, $100 in 2010 would be worth $2.8B today.

491 1K 12K 983K 2K

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

The storage issue remains an existential threat to NFTs. What’s the point of provenance if it points to an empty box in 10 years?

0 1 2 80 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

Going down the ipfs rabbit hole and counting how many nodes are publicly pining certain NFTs. So far I see as few as 2.

1 0 3 79 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

@mintface @0xCuttlefish Oof, that’s painful.. need to check it out

0 0 0 24 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

Are there any major NFT collections that are actual broken links now? Seen screenshots, but I’ve never actually seen it in the wild yet. Is it because most platforms have cached images?

1 1 2 176 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

@mintface That’s a very nice one indeed. I’m partial to the pilots 🧑‍✈️

0 0 1 33 0

View Details

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

Purely subjective, but I haven’t seen one “bargain” for a 2021 pfp in months. The kind where the aesthetics stand out and make you want to hang it on a wall. This makes me think the buyers and sellers with certain tastes are already done. To everyone their own, though.

Semui.eth @iamSemui

7 months ago

I like to browse NFT collections on days like these 📉

0 0 0 209 0

1 0 0 165 0

View Details

DGMD.6529 @DGMD22

7 months ago

Kinda funny to see a sudden wave of OG Bitcoiners (who likely sold the majority of their stack last 12 months) pivot and start shilling ZCash as a 'Better Bitcoin'. Privacy is an important niche here, but there are many holes here that people are turning a blind eye to. First of all, ZCash is pretty OG itself but that still doesn't mean it has a moat around privacy, not anywhere the same that Bitcoin does around being an irreplicable store of value. There will be many forms of privacy coins as the meta continues to slow burn, and many of those will diffuse mind share and capital. Additionally, privacy is great but if you are gonna hold ZCash, you better have conviction to hold through multiple -90% dips. Regulatory bodies are NOT going to be accepting of it the same way they have now become to bitcoin. That's not to say governments are right, privacy can be a right in itself, but they will fight it hard... and that will be reflected in multiple brutal shakeouts. At the end of the day, Bitcoin as a SoV and as a currency that is actually being accepted globally at all levels is still likely to accrue the most massive value over time. There are still the ongoing concerns over Quantum, etc. but I have the same view as Saylor on this - as concerns arise, as do anti-Quantum solutions - Banks, finance, governments are at way higher risk to be hacked and chaos ensue than Bitcoin at this point.