hitthread @hitthread

@SoulzBTC TRADING

@tomcrawshaw01 BLUEPRINT

@Ersin0X The plane is about to land which means he just got his case out a minute earlier! How low do you think his IQ is?

@Hania16836 Her life 😞

@aarohiyadav100 995311

@aarohiyadav100 Wait it's 995,311 lol

@marryevan999 Oh wow 442 RTs dat a lot of folk that don't read or think, which is great news for scammers, lol, maybe Claude suggested this bs?

@elonmusk Dude, level V here we come

@446F546F35 @EmmanuelMacron That image is AI generated, those identical kids would be blinded or deafened from muzzle flash let alone recoil and ejected shells. It's definitely #ai #fake. Israelis are not welcome in many countries now due to #Genocide_in_Gaza . #Cyprus seems to be welcoming Israeli money!

REAL decentralization. With Gigagas. Surge testnet is live in Stage 2! A based rollup template showcasing trustless scaling true to @Ethereum principles. 1 Ggas per second capacity via Nethermind Client, on a fully open-source stack you can use today. Get started now: - Add to wallet - Bridge Hoodi ETH - Start experimenting Check out our docs: docs.surge.wtf Explore our Github: github.com/NethermindEth/…

A new legal letter aimed at OpenAI lays out in stark terms the money and power grab OpenAI is trying to trick its board members into accepting — what one analyst calls "the theft of the millennium." The simple facts of the case are both devastating and darkly hilarious. I'll explain for your amusement. The letter 'Not For Private Gain' is written for the relevant Attorneys General and is signed by 3 Nobel Prize winners among dozens of top ML researchers, legal experts, economists, ex-OpenAI staff and civil society groups. (I'll link below.) It says that OpenAI's attempt to restructure as a for-profit is simply totally illegal, like you might naively expect. It then asks the Attorneys General (AGs) to take some extreme measures I've never seen discussed before. Here's how they build up to their radical demands. For 9 years OpenAI and its founders went on ad nauseam about how non-profit control was essential to: 1. Prevent a few people concentrating immense power 2. Ensure the benefits of artificial general intelligence (AGI) were shared with all humanity 3. Avoid the incentive to risk other people's lives to get even richer They told us these commitments were legally binding and inescapable. They weren't in it for the money or the power. We could trust them. "The goal isn't to build AGI, it's to make sure AGI benefits humanity" said OpenAI President Greg Brockman. And indeed, OpenAI’s charitable purpose, which its board is legally obligated to pursue, is to “ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity” rather than advancing “the private gain of any person.” 100s of top researchers chose to work for OpenAI at below-market salaries, in part motivated by this idealism. It was core to OpenAI's recruitment and PR strategy. Now along comes 2024. That idealism has paid off. OpenAI is one of the world's hottest companies. The money is rolling in. But now suddenly we're told the setup under which they became one of the fastest-growing startups in history, the setup that was supposedly totally essential and distinguished them from their rivals, and the protections that made it possible for us to trust them, ALL HAVE TO GO ASAP: 1. The non-profit's (and therefore humanity at large’s) right to super-profits, should they make tens of trillions? Gone. (Guess where that money will go now!) 2. The non-profit’s ownership of AGI, and ability to influence how it’s actually used once it’s built? Gone. 3. The non-profit's ability (and legal duty) to object if OpenAI is doing outrageous things that harm humanity? Gone. 4. A commitment to assist another AGI project if necessary to avoid a harmful arms race, or if joining forces would help the US beat China? Gone. 5. Majority board control by people who don't have a huge personal financial stake in OpenAI? Gone. 6. The ability of the courts or Attorneys General to object if they betray their stated charitable purpose of benefitting humanity? Gone, gone, gone! Screenshotting from the letter: (I'll do a new tweet after each image so they appear right.) 1/

@krea_ai 🗝️ I'd love to get an invite and review it ✨ @krea_ai

@skirano @yawnxyz @Replit Woaah, that's brilliant, can I get the link to learn too pleases

@tazthekiwi Kayakibin :-)

@VictorPontis @LumaHQ Congrats on iOS app, please bring that to Android. Outside of US, isn't so Apple centric. I'm looking forward to moving from EB

@LumaHQ @davlam_ Please do @LumaHQ, you'll get huge migration from EB

@Bitboy_Crypto Huh? but Ben is bitboy isn't he, did he gross misconduct? @Bitboy_Crypto please explain

@ZoeSchiffer @e Didn't I see a tweet recently from Elon to X asking to buy it for $69,420,420 I guess he thinks it's a joke, but that's a public announcement, doesn't it stand?

Twitter shouldn't kill internet browsing. Instead kerb scraping with “infosec engineering, forbid bad forms of scraping in terms of service, add a volume based liquidated damages clause, prominently litigate against large scale commercial abuse” @TimSweeneyEpic @elonmusk

Twitter feels broken, with the new no browser access without being logged in, it's losing new sign ups and breaking the cohesive internet. Ultimately Twitter will decline further if this continues. I can't even write a normal length tweet now. Users are being punished. @elonmusk