Capy @funofcapy

@TrillKek @cobie We paired a token with your son

BaseCattery is one of the more interesting low-cap ideas on Base You hold $CATTERY → farm kittens → earn $BASECAT Why it stands out: your multiplier grows with hold time up to 10x for stronger long-term holders selling resets the multiplier, so weak hands lose their edge creator fees are used to buy $BASECAT and distribute it to holders payouts happen every 15 minutes So the loop is simple: hold longer = farm more kittens = get a bigger share of rewards And the cap comparison is what makes this even more interesting: $CATTERY is sitting around a 20k market cap, while another token with a very similar reward/holding concept had ath 350k ($CASHKITTEN with $cashcat) Same general idea, but a much lower valuation here That’s why BaseCattery feels underwatched to me: cute concept, strong retention mechanic, real onchain reward loop, and still tiny cap $CATTERY / $BASECAT worth watching

BaseCattery @basecattery

7 days ago

0xb200000000000000000000b7cfb11fed7d569801 The first Basecat rewards token on Base! Hold BaseCattery and earn BaseCat every 15 minutes. Multiplier grows +1x per hour held, sell any amount and your multipler snaps back to normal.

1 0 9 918 0

I’m the #1 $OUTBAG holder, and this is the utility I want to see: Let tile owners RENT their space Every owner sets their own daily rental price in $OUTBAG. Projects can rent a tile for 1 day, 7 days, 30 days — whatever they need Each payment: → 50% goes to the tile owner 💰→ 50% gets burned 🔥 Why this is powerful for holders: Your tile becomes a yield-generating asset. The better the position, the more you can potentially charge. At the same time, every rental creates real demand for $OUTBAG and permanently removes part of the supply. So holders get both: income from owning valuable tiles + stronger token utility The board becomes digital real estate with its own economy Bullish flywheel for $OUTBAG @0xEtherlect outbag.fun

Capy @funofcapy

7 days ago

Idea for $Outbag: let tile owners rent out their space Projects could pay in $OUTBAG to rent a tile for a set period — 50% of the payment gets burned, and 50% goes to the tile owner More utility for $OUTBAG, passive income for holders, and a recurring burn mechanism

0 4 11 1K 3

Idea for $Outbag: let tile owners rent out their space Projects could pay in $OUTBAG to rent a tile for a set period — 50% of the payment gets burned, and 50% goes to the tile owner More utility for $OUTBAG, passive income for holders, and a recurring burn mechanism @0xEtherlect

$platypus vs $frong

deployer @0xDeployer

2 weeks ago

@coinerhit @alexmccurryo @pools_dot_fun TIL

19 8 46 10K 2

@RWA_404 got it

@feliperatfi @goekhan sure. I'm waiting @goekhan

@feliperatfi @goekhan x.com/search?q=from%…

Fun fact: $duck 🦆 eat frong:native Even more fun fact: unicorns don’t exist Uniswap 🤝 launchpad Sushi 🤝 launchpad The DEX wars are evolving into launchpad wars On one side: 🦄 with pools.trade and $uni $frong On the other: 🦆 — Sushi × bnkr energy, now building pools.fun I’m betting on $duck 🦆🦆sushi.com/robinhood/laun…

1/ There is now strong on-chain evidence that @TradePools itself launched $POOLS on Robinhood Chain. CA: 0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a This isn't based on the token name, logo, or a typed X handle. It's inside the actual launch calldata. robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/address/0x7Fe3… 🧵 2/ The launch transaction is: 0x7cca0c8eb394ad4628735e04e6f08e3f0080415f75118c7f040694c6209acc6c robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x7cca0c8eb… It calls: multicall(bytes[]) Method ID: 0xac9650d8 So we can inspect the launch inputs directly on-chain. 3/ The calldata contains the token metadata itself. Hex: 547261646520506f6f6c73 → Trade Pools and: 504f4f4c53 → POOLS But this part alone proves almost nothing. Anyone can copy a token name, ticker, logo or type TradePools into metadata. The interesting part comes next. 4/ Embedded directly in the launch calldata is this JSON: {"v":1,"xVerificationToken":"..."} This is important because the X identity is not just sitting in ordinary token metadata. The launch contains a separate verification token produced by the Pools.trade flow. pools.trade 5/ The raw hex beginning at the metadata field: 7b2276223a312c2278566572696669636174696f6e546f6b656e223a... decodes to: {"v":1,"xVerificationToken":"eyJ4X2hhbmRsZSI6IlRyYWRlUG9vbHMi..."} Everything here is permanently recorded on Robinhood Chain. Robinhood Chain mainnet: Chain ID 4663 docs.robinhood.com/chain/connecti… 6/ Decode the payload of that xVerificationToken and you get: x_handle: TradePools x_user_id: 2080394757721735168 wallet_address: 0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501 iat: 1785947908895 That iat = 2026-08-05 16:38:28.895 UTC. 7/ The X user ID is much more interesting than the displayed handle. Handles can be renamed. X user IDs are persistent account identifiers. Open: x.com/i/user/2080394… It resolves to: @TradePools x.com/TradePools So the verification payload isn't merely saying "TradePools". It identifies the actual X account by its numeric user ID. 8/ Now look at the wallet: 0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501 That wallet is encoded INSIDE the verification payload. The same wallet is also present directly in the launch calldata. And it is the deployer / sender associated with this POOLS launch. So the structure is effectively: @TradePools X identity ↓ x_user_id 2080394757721735168 ↓ Pools verification token ↓ 0xe83E...C501 ↓ POOLS launch ↓ 0x7Fe377...122a 9/ This is fundamentally different from someone simply launching a fake token called “Trade Pools.” A spoof can copy: • name • ticker • logo • website • typed X handle But this launch carries a verification payload binding: TradePools + X user ID + wallet + timestamp inside the transaction itself. 10/ There's another useful detail. The second call inside the multicall explicitly contains the POOLS contract: 0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a and later the verified wallet: 0xe83E8EC76783d9f072D847EE69b7e630A8b6C501 So this isn't a verification blob found in some unrelated transaction. It's part of the launch flow for this exact CA. 11/ Important technical caveat: The verification string is shaped as: base64url(payload).signature not a normal 3-part JWT: header.payload.signature And without Pools.trade's signing secret/public verification method, outsiders cannot independently recompute the signature. So I am NOT claiming we have independently cryptographically verified Pools' backend signature. 12/ But that doesn't make the evidence meaningless. For this to be fake, one of the following would need to be true: A) Pools.trade lets arbitrary users obtain verification tokens claiming someone else's X user ID; B) its X verification/authentication flow is broken; C) the verification token itself can be forged; or D) Pools.trade intentionally issued a token binding @TradePools to this wallet. If their verification system works as intended, D is the obvious explanation. 13/ And @TradePools isn't some random account attached to the token. Pools.trade is the Uniswap Labs launch product for Robinhood Chain: pools.trade Uniswap: blog.uniswap.org/pools-trade-a-… Official X: x.com/TradePools Robinhood Chain: docs.robinhood.com/chain/ 14/ So my current conclusion: The on-chain evidence strongly indicates that the wallet which launched 0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a was authorized through Pools.trade as the real @TradePools X identity. That's a dramatically stronger claim than “the token has TradePools written in its metadata.” 15/ Is this absolute proof that Uniswap Labs officially endorses $POOLS? No. Until @TradePools / Uniswap publicly posts the canonical CA, there is still a distinction between: “launched by an X-authenticated @TradePools wallet” and “officially announced Uniswap/Pools token.” But based on the on-chain launch data, I think 0x7Fe...122a is very likely the genuine TradePools launch. Verify it yourself: TX: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/tx/0x7cca0c8eb… CA: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/address/0x7Fe3… Pools: pools.trade X ID: x.com/i/user/2080394…

$50 on base=$1 arc Dm me I wanna buy

sell me $1 on arc arc bridge

$fefer brought protection. Holders didn’t🦖

@paoloardoino tether loves $fefer

@BasedOneX @Stable $Fefer

Are you enough bullish on @Stable? $fefer $stable $jay $stableguy $vefer

@SockPussy500 🫃🏿

@SockPussy500 

Robbin’ Loot is one of the most thematically native projects on Robinhood Chain The entire concept is built around one simple connection: Robinhood → Robin Hood → Sherwood Forest → loot Every $LOOT buy and sell is taxed. Part of the fees goes into the Pot, which uses the accumulated ETH to buy $LOOT from the market and distribute it to randomly selected holders Smaller holders receive a higher Luck score, so rewards aren’t determined purely by wallet size The rest of the fees flows into the Pyre, an automated buyback-and-burn mechanism. The more trading volume $LOOT generates, the more rewards can be distributed and the more supply can be permanently removed from circulation There’s also a 2% max-wallet limit, while the sell tax can dynamically increase when sell pressure rises Robbin’ Loot isn’t simply deployed on Robinhood Chain — it turns the chain’s name into its brand, lore, and token mechanics Robinhood Chain becomes a digital Sherwood Forest Holders are the Merry Men Trading fees are the toll Rewards are the shared loot @RobbinLoot

@RobbinLoot Gloot