ee @eeupw

Canada Joined November 2014

Tweets

151
Followers

352
Following

5K
Likes

3K

Cats with Aura 😺 @catwithaura

3 months ago

pure joy ✨

44 1K 7K 166K 530

View Details

Historic Vids @historyinmemes

2 years ago

The array of different reactions is taking me out

977 17K 239K 20.6M 21K

View Details

Buitengebieden @buitengebieden

2 years ago

Can’t stop watching this.. 😊

582 7K 66K 5.1M 6K

View Details

Posts Of Cats @PostsOfCats

2 years ago

He woke up and said "where the hell am I"

348 8K 112K 7.5M 7K

View Details

We Assess Cats 🐾 @WeAssessCats

2 years ago

Having the nap of his life 🤣

503 5K 43K 1.3M 2K

View Details

Buitengebieden @buitengebieden

2 years ago

Cats.. 🤦‍♂️

239 936 15K 1.3M 545

View Details

Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright

2 years ago

@MarkDGoldCoast It is impossible to escape the impression that major news outlets (NYT, WaPo, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, NPR), science news outlets (Science, Nature), Democrat Congressional leadership, and White House prefer that the public is misinformed--or at minimum uninformed--on this subject.

7 18 137 3K 8

View Details

Science girl @sciencegirl

2 years ago

Why did it choose that? x.com/Sadie2901/stat…

406 5K 62K 3.9M 3K

View Details

Matt Ridley @mattwridley

2 years ago

The WHO's track record is not encouraging: On 14 January 2020, at a time when hospitals in Wuhan were seeing a flood of Covid cases, many of whom had never been near animals in a market and some of whom were in turn infecting healthcare workers, the WHO repeated the Chinese government’s nonsensical insistence that you could normally only catch Covid from an animal, not a person: “it is very clear right now that we have no sustained human-to-human transmission.

Matt Ridley @mattwridley

2 years ago

dailymail.co.uk/debate/article… "Under Article 18, countries would also agree to limit criticism of the WHO in order to “combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation”. Thus this very article could in theory be censored by our government at the behest of the WHO."

36 279 613 112K 52

23 186 686 77K 76

View Details

Clark H @Clarksterh

2 years ago

Genuinely surprising NYT still hasn’t reported on the Slack Channel release that included some authors of the 2020 COVID Origins paper directly and contemporaneously contradicting the position of the paper.

Emily Kopp @emilyakopp

2 years ago

@semaforben @zeynep thanks for covering this. the scientists say they honestly changed their minds over time, but I mapped their public and private statements chronologically and found that to be false. the New York Times still hasn't covered the Slacks. usrtk.org/covid-19-origi…

10 38 199 8K 19

5 2 27 2K 0

View Details

Dr. Gennadi Glinsky, MD, Ph.D. @gglinskii

2 years ago

Creating dangerous viruses in the lab is a bad way to guard against future pandemics thebulletin.org/2021/11/creati…

5 12 49 1K 4

View Details

Buitengebieden @buitengebieden

2 years ago

Lazy Caturday.. 😅

122 3K 28K 1.1M 567

View Details

ee @eeupw

2 years ago

@MJnanostretch It has revealed a field which is unable and unwilling to regulate itself like other professions. When industrial disasters happen in other sectors there are major investigations, and safeguards employed to protect the public. It is staggering that it hasn't happened yet.

1 1 5 364 0

View Details

Yanna Lambrinidou, PhD @DrishtiEthics

2 years ago

"If SARS-CoV-2 did enter the human species through a laboratory accident, it's not just a case of *research* that went wrong. It would be a case of *pandemic prevention research* that went wrong. And I think that's quite a key point that I'm not sure I felt has been ...

Bryce Nickels @Bryce_Nickels

2 years ago

The COVID origin cover-up: "The Elephant in the Room" In 2024, acknowledging COVID-19 likely originated from a lab shouldn't be controversial. However, when @mattwridley brought this up at the Pathogens Project report launch yesterday, it led to a prolonged, awkward silence.

45 203 552 144K 83

9 55 209 17K 19

View Details

Nature is Amazing ☘️ @AMAZlNGNATURE

2 years ago

The best boat horn.. 😂🔊

254 4K 39K 2.4M 2K

View Details

Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright

2 years ago

COVID-19: twelve arguments for lab origin: 1) Pandemic caused by bat SARS-like coronavirus emerged in Wuhan--a city that is 800 miles from wild bats with SARS-CoV-2-like coronaviruses, but that has labs conducting world's largest research program on bat SARS-like coronaviruses.

64 577 2K 307K 818

View Details

@mbalter — investigations and commentary @mbalter

2 years ago

This may sound like an exaggeration but there is documented proof that the Proximal Origin paper in @NatureMedicine did NOT reflect the actual scientific conclusions of its authors. No ambiguity whatsoever.

Bryce Nickels @Bryce_Nickels

2 years ago

This is just one of a multitude of quotes from the authors of Proximal Origins that show, definitively, they committed scientific fraud. Proximal Origins is the product of clear fraud and should be retracted.

2 16 116 6K 10

2 22 88 3K 3

View Details

Gilles Demaneuf @gdemaneuf

2 years ago

1/26 My comments about this just published poling of experts, examining their opinions on the plausible origins of Covid-19. There is a lot to unpack. Much more than I have seen so far in reductive tweets. So here it is. x.com/SaskiaPopescu/… @RogerPielkeJr @BallouxFrancois

Dr. Saskia Popescu @SaskiaPopescu

2 years ago

“The study’s experts overall stated that the pandemic most likely originated via a natural zoonotic event, defined as an event in which a non-human animal infected a human, and in which the infection did not occur in the course of any form of virological or biomedical research.”

120 67 199 264K 63

14 67 163 58K 62

View Details

ee @eeupw

2 years ago

A very good point to remember. There has been especially bad behavior from those in a field aimed at the study and prevention of threats to human health, who are instead acting to suppress reasonable inquiry. If that happened in any other professional field, the response would be extreme public and regulatory pressure to ensure accountability and prevent a future occurrence.