Eric Choi @echoi333

I just want to be successful thats all..

This is super interesting You now have non-tech normal people outship tech people in terms of reaching revenue fast I have lots of techy software engineer friends and they have been trying for years to get any MRR for their sideprojects and they still haven't Here's an Indonesian girl, who's tapped into TikTok culture, knows what to ship, can't even code but ships it fast thanks to AI and gets to $800 MRR in the first month So we're officially in a new time now: it's now literally just a competition of being as tapped into the culture as possible, to then be able spot a trend and rapidly built and launch a site/app/biz around it, and make money There is little to any benefit being in tech now over normal people, maybe even the opposite as tech people are very up to date on tech things but often quite out of date on many non-tech cultural trends This is a great thing, but a bitter pill to swallow: another gatekeeper wiped out and every tech builder has to now stop putting effort into tech skills, and instead put effort into understanding culture trends to see what to build next And build it fast!

@

57 years ago

0 0 0 0 0

Let me explain exactly why parents pay $25,000 a year for youth sports their kid will never play professionally, because the math is more interesting than the headlines suggest. The $25K is buying admissions arbitrage at elite colleges. Run it both ways. Scholarship math first. The US has 8 million high school athletes. Roughly 7% play in college, 2% at D1. Total NCAA athletic scholarship spend is $3.6 billion across about 175,000 D1 athletes, mostly partial aid in the low teens per year. A family putting in $25K annually from age 6 to 18 spends $300K chasing a maximum return of about $80K. The expected value is a lottery ticket. Admissions math second. The SFFA v. Harvard trial disclosed that recruited athletes get admitted at 86%. The non-athlete rate sits around 5%. Even academically weak applicants jump to a 98% admit probability if recruited. A non-athlete with a 1397 SAT has roughly 0.08% odds at Harvard. The same kid recruited for crew has 70%+. The athletic hook is the largest single advantage in elite admissions, bigger than legacy or dean's list. Ivies don't even offer athletic scholarships. The value is purely the admissions ticket. This is what $25K buys. Year-round travel ball is the qualifier round for an admissions process operating on different rules than the one your kid's classmates compete in. The "country club sports" pipeline (squash, lacrosse, crew, fencing, golf) is a feature. Barrier to entry is the product. 90% of Ivy League squash players come from $30K-a-year private high schools. The math works because the alternative pool is small. PE arrived after the demand existed. Unrivaled Sports, Perfect Game, regional travel-ball roll-ups. Upper-middle-class parents had already turned youth sports into a class transmission mechanism. PE consolidated the supply chain and raised prices because the buyers were already there at $25K. $300K to convert a 4% admit rate at an Ivy into an 86% one. Plus the alumni network and pre-professional sorting that follows. That's the actual equation. The trade is rational at the top of the income distribution. Brutal everywhere else.

More Perfect Union @MorePerfectUS

3 months ago

NEW: Youth sports is now costing parents as much as $25,000 a year. Private equity and corporations are turning a childhood pastime into something only the wealthy can afford. Youth sports has become a $40 billion industry, and the steep costs are crushing American families.

299 3K 10K 4.3M 3K

I took delivery of a beautiful new shiny HW4 Tesla Model X today, so I immediately took it out for an FSD test drive, a bit like I used to do almost daily for 5 years. Basically... I'm amazed - it drives really, really well, smooth, confident, noticeably better than what I'm used to on HW3 (my previous car) and eons ahead of the version I remember driving up highway 280 on my first day at Tesla ~9 years ago, where I had to intervene every time the road mildly curved or sloped. (note this is v13, my car hasn't been offered the latest v14 yet) On the highway, I felt like a passenger in some super high tech Maglev train pod - the car is locked in the center of the lane while I'm looking out from Model X's higher vantage point and its panoramic front window, listening to the (incredible) sound system, or chatting with Grok. On city streets, the car casually handled a number of tricky scenarios that I remember losing sleep over just a few years ago. It negotiated incoming cars in tight lanes, it gracefully went around construction and temporarily in-lane stationary cars, it correctly timed tricky left turns with incoming traffic from both sides, it gracefully gave way to the car that went out of order in the 4-way stop sign, it found a way to squeeze into a bumper to bumper traffic to make its turn, it overtook the bus that was loading passengers but still stopped for the stop sign that was blocked by the bus, and at the end of the route it circled around a parking lot, found a spot and... parked. Basically a flawless drive. For context, I'm used to going out for a brief test drive around the neighborhood to return with 20 clips of things that could be improved. It's new for me to do just that and exactly like I used to, but come back with nothing. Perfect drive, no notes. I expect there's still more work for the team in the long march of 9s, but it's just so cool to see that we're beyond finding issues on any individual ~1 hour drive around the neighborhood, you actually have to go to the fleet and mine them. Back then, I processed the incredible promise of vehicle autonomy at scale (in the fully scaleable, vision only, end-to-end Tesla way) only intellectually, but now it is possible to feel it intuitively too if you just go out for a drive. Wait, of course surround video stream at 60Hz processed by a fully dedicated "driving brain" neural net will work, and it will be so much better and safer than a human driver. Did anyone else think otherwise? I also watched @aelluswamy 's new ICCV25 talk last week (x.com/aelluswamy/sta…) that hints at some of the recent under the hood technical components driving this progress. Sensor streams (videos, maps, kinematics, audio, ...) over long contexts (e.g. ~30 seconds) go into a big neural net, steering/acceleration comes out, optionally with visualization auxiliary data. This is the dream of the complete Software 1.0 -> Software 2.0 re-write that scales fully with data streaming from millions of cars in the fleet and the compute capacity of your chip, not some engineer's clever new DoubleParkedCarHandler C++ abstraction with undefined test-time characteristics of memory and runtime. There's a lot more hints in the video on where things are going with the emerging "robotics+AI at scale stack". World reconstructors, world simulators "dreaming" dynamics, RL, all of these components general, foundational, neural net based, how the car is really just one kind of robot... are people getting this yet? Huge congrats to the team - you're building magic objects of the future, you rock! And I love my car <3.

Ashok Elluswamy @aelluswamy

9 months ago

Full video of the ICCV '25 presentation

54 293 2K 207K 2K

When I was part of a korean accelerator there was this mentor that was supposed to meet with me weekly, but he just never showed up Unfortunately, he realized that in order to get paid he had to show proof that he met with me So he invited me to a zoom call out of the blue and then asked me to go find 3 different jackets I thought the request was strange, but maybe this was some karate kid shit where he was training me to become a better salesman with strangers? Either way, it seemed like an interesting challenge, so I went around the office and I successfully coerced 3 people to let me borrow their outerwear When I returned, he told me to position myself in different poses with different jackets and he'd take screenshots (so that he could have evidence that appears as though he mentored me throughout the program) At this point, I was a little uncomfortable because i could tell he was just trying to get paid, so I looked over at the VCs who ran the accelerator but they motioned for me to just do it I didn't want to disrespect anybody, so I just did an impromptu fashion show with the 3 jackets When the photoshoot was over, I hoped that he'd spend a few hours with me to make up for all of the missed mentoring time Nope, he didn't say anything and he just left lmao It was a true what the fuck moment and no one in the office batted an eye because apparently it's quite normal to fake pictures and proof for government funding requirements in Korea I was a total startup noob and in a foreign country, so I just did as I was told (this was 4+ years ago) Would never ever do this if it were to happen today I'm reminded of this story because now I'm asked to be a mentor at some of these Korean accelerator programs I usually decline, but when I accept, I try my best to show up and actually be a mentor lol

this time 3 years ago i was diagnosed with thyroid cancer it's been so long that i honestly forget i even had it 99% of the time grateful that time has erased most of the bad memories, and even more grateful to be cancer-free! 🤠

it took us around 46 months to hit $1M ARR btw it may seem like everyone on the timeline effortlessly/instantly hits this milestone, but that's not normal or realistic i was stuck at $2k MRR for 3 years!

Agency > Intelligence I had this intuitively wrong for decades, I think due to a pervasive cultural veneration of intelligence, various entertainment/media, obsession with IQ etc. Agency is significantly more powerful and significantly more scarce. Are you hiring for agency? Are we educating for agency? Are you acting as if you had 10X agency? Grok explanation is ~close: “Agency, as a personality trait, refers to an individual's capacity to take initiative, make decisions, and exert control over their actions and environment. It’s about being proactive rather than reactive—someone with high agency doesn’t just let life happen to them; they shape it. Think of it as a blend of self-efficacy, determination, and a sense of ownership over one’s path. People with strong agency tend to set goals and pursue them with confidence, even in the face of obstacles. They’re the type to say, “I’ll figure it out,” and then actually do it. On the flip side, someone low in agency might feel more like a passenger in their own life, waiting for external forces—like luck, other people, or circumstances—to dictate what happens next. It’s not quite the same as assertiveness or ambition, though it can overlap. Agency is quieter, more internal—it’s the belief that you *can* act, paired with the will to follow through. Psychologists often tie it to concepts like locus of control: high-agency folks lean toward an internal locus, feeling they steer their fate, while low-agency folks might lean external, seeing life as something that happens *to* them.”

Garry Tan @garrytan

a year ago

Intelligence is on tap now so agency is even more important

149 627 7K 6.4M 2K

4 years of burning cash got rejected by almost every VC had to move back in with parents posted hundreds of videos into the void but eventually everything works out :)

Jenni has plateaued at ~$730k MRR for a year now Kind of hurts my ego to type it out, but I prioritized creating a profitable + robust startup over explosive growth I don't regret this decision, but when I see other products hitting insane growth milestones, I can't lie, I do get tempted to turn down the profitability knob and just speed run to $1M MRR lol However, we were able to stick to our original strategy and now I'm super happy with the composition of Jenni group and the diverse growth channels that we've been able to build out The systems are now in place where we'll be able to keep our profit margins and start growing modestly month over month There aren't too many seed strapped companies and even fewer that build in public like us It'd be great if we could be an example for future startups that there are a myriad of paths that you can take as a founder (besides just bootstrapping vs raising capital) Will be posting our new MRR total in 6 days at the end of the month and that'll be the first of hopefully many months where it's clear we are on our way to $1M MRR profitably It's definitely going to be a lot of work, but v excited for what's to come!

✨ Photo AI just reached a new record of $150,000/mo 💳 2,573 active subscribers 💸 87% profit margin 👌 100% bootstrapped + $0 funding 😊 Employees: 1 = just me on my laptop 🥞 Tech: PHP + jQuery + SQLite on a Hetzner VPS with Nginx and Ubuntu It took 2 years, 7 months, 14 days, or almost 1000 days to get there Photo AI started out in 2022 as Avatar AI (the first app to make those gimmicky avatars which started that trend) Then I pivoted it into Photo AI a year later to take real AI photos of yourself. Because I thought that might be possible next. In a way I was way too early and the photos were actually pretty bad for about 2 years (remember the hands?). Faces were distorted and it didn't resemble you much. I used Stable Diffusion back then and it was the best model but it wasn't so good at people. But with a lot of help from @philz1337x I then built a giant pipeline of models on top of other models to fix faces, hands, and bodies and upscaling it to make it look somewhat good, but still it wasn't great In a way I had product-market-fit (PMF) but without the product. Because I knew the demand would be there but the product, well the technology, definitely wasn't there (yet!) Then in 2024, a new AI image model called Flux was launched and overnight Photo AI was now good enough: the photos actually really resembled you, the quality was high and hands, faces and bodies looked real I now did have PMF! Since then Photo AI has grown a lot and it's now become a highly realistic AI photo and video production studio for content that features real people. There's other AI image generators, but they're not as good with people as mine, because that's my focus and niche Photo AI is now used by fashion designers (to try on clothes), ad makers (for talking videos), marketers (to show people presenting physical products), education companies (to teach people courses), short film makers (making videos with real actors) and game designers (to create 3d characters from people) And even just people who want to do a photo shoot for their social media profile or dating app and can't afford an expensive $1000 photographer (you get 1000 pics for $49, so about 20x-50x cheaper) The app itself is standing on the shoulders of giants, that I am grateful every day for, which are the countless AI models I use and combine which are made by companies like Black Forest Labs, Bytedance, Kuaishou and more recently Google (with Nano Banana) made by very smart AI researchers and my GPU providers FAL and Wavespeed hosting them reliably When I started people kept telling me I just made a "GPT wrapper" (of course it didn't even use ChatGPT), then a "Flux wrapper". I now use a lot more models than Flux, so yes I guess it's more like "shitloads of models duct taped together with a lot of frontend and backend logic added wrapper" but that doesn't roll of the tongue so easily 😂 Most of my traffic comes from SEO and specifically pSEO, there's a lot of sub pages I added (like the photo packs and individual phtoos) which capture a lot of traffic and sign ups. X is about 9% of traffic and even less of paid signups, so a lot less than people usually think. I'm mostly on here to tell my story, X doesn't actually help so much revenue wise. Increasingly ChatGPT etc is becoming a bigger referrer of traffic and paid signups though There's so many other AI apps out there, and mostly we all use the same models, and I guess Photo AI shows there is enough pie for everyone, it's not the biggest either, but it's big for me and it's nice in its own way and I get happy working on it It's been a wild ride, and stressful at times (especially during 2023 trying to get Stable Diffusion to work), but mostly just really exciting to be able to work with groundbreaking technology every day and get paid for it too I remember in 2021 with my businesses Nomad List and Remote OK sitting and thinking "after almost a decade coding, everything is finally kind of stable now, now I am satisfied" but then the AI wave started in mid 2022 and I just knew I had to jump on it and catch that wave and I did with my entire being :D And I caught it I think! 🏄‍♂️ Surf's uppppppppp 🤠

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

What’s the difference between a $10m, $100m, and $1b lifestyle? Asked this question in Hampton's Slack community since we have people worth $10m - $2b. A few takeaways from the 50+ replies: $50k – $100k liquid • The first “I feel rich” for many in 20s. • Bills stop hurting. You breathe. • $1M net worth rarely changes anything. In high-cost cities, it’s just “comfortable professional.” Still very income-dependent. $10M liquid - This is the first real unlock. • Safety net feels permanent • You stop looking at the right side of the menu • Business-class by default, 5 hotels when you want • You can cover friends’ flights to make trips happen • Life doesn’t run you anymore. $20M–$25M liquid: • “I can spend $50k/mo forever and still compound.” • Nicer primary home (or rent ultra-nice; fewer ownership headaches) • Staff for convenience (nanny, cleaners) • Family support start to be normal, not “splurge” $50M liquid • Cash flow is thick and hard to fully redeploy. • 2nd homes, extended travel • Serious privacy planning begins • You’re learning trusts, tax vehicles, and who to not trust $100M: • Life becomes frictionless. • Fly private often (some buy; many rent because ownership is work) • Full household team + exec assistants + specialists • Family office(s), capital allocation becomes a job • You choose projects; problems get solved without you Past $100M • personal lifestyle doesn’t change much—scale and privacy do. • Land for privacy buffers • Private gyms/courts/spas at home • You’ll never fly commercial unless you want to $1 billion • Money becomes institutional. • You never see a bill • Global properties, fully private travel • Governments, universities, and CEOs court you • It’s legacy season: foundations, endowments, monuments A few real anecdotes from the thread: • A billionaire bought a pro sports team mid-flight on his jet. His right-hand guy became COO. • A friend group dropped $200k–$300k on a yacht week just to get everyone together. • Multiple members set up dual family offices (JPM + independent) to manage life + investments. The biggest trap everyone warned about: • “Coming into money without accomplishing anything is a curse.” • Lottery-winner energy breaks people. Purpose > purchases. Cash flow > net worth (psychologically). • Even people with $50M–$100M feel “poor” during low-cashflow years. Meaning, even if you have a high net worth -- if your business income goes away even if you don't need it, it feels horrible. Mentally brutal. What actually brings joy at scale: • Buying back time (coaches, chefs, pilots, concierge) • Funding memories (fly the whole crew, pick up every tab) • Being present (one member took a year as a stay-at-home dad - “wouldn’t trade it for anything”) What gets old fast: • More “stuff” to manage • Identity tied to net worth • Chasing bigger dopamine (toys) instead of deeper meaning (health, family, service, community) -- Ok, that's it - that's my ChatGPT summary of all the replies!

@dvassallo At least they seem to be honest about their numbers 😛

@marclou This is impressive given that you quite often stay in Korea, where there’s lots of food that’s super delicious but not the healthiest

@mkanapaka @TheTennisLetter This is a great comment 👍

complexity first, simplicity second people say “keep it simple,” but most approach it backwards. they start from simple, then add on complexity without seeing the whole. that’s how you end up with frankenstein products: clean-looking components awkwardly stitched together, held in place by duct tape and wishful thinking. true simplicity emerges only after you’ve grasped the full complexity first. you can’t abstract away what you don’t fully comprehend. once you deeply understand the entire system — the edge cases, feedback loops, emergent behaviors — then the elegant patterns start to surface, creating solutions that genuinely click. people often misunderstand complexity as the enemy of simplicity. but complexity isn’t the enemy, it’s reality. your goal isn’t to ignore complexity, but to master it. when you think holistically, you create systems whose parts reinforce each other rather than clash. the UI naturally mirrors the underlying data model. the API aligns seamlessly with how users think. the entire product feels inevitable. real builders dive into the messy reality and embrace it. they map out the bizarre edge cases, user mental models, technical constraints, and business pressures. they sit patiently with complexity until the right patterns emerge. only then do they craft the simple, intuitive interface that makes all that complexity invisible. it’s like a swan, serene on the surface but paddling like hell beneath. this is why Notion succeeds where most productivity apps fail. we didn’t start by saying, “let’s build a simple notes app.” we asked, “how would people organize and share information, with the fewest primitives” then we built abstractions that aligned with those conceptual models. systems thinking is essential because it’s the only path to building products that scale — not just technically, but cognitively. users shouldn’t need to grasp your internal complexities to extract value. that’s the paradox: the more deeply you embrace complexity in your thinking, the simpler the experience becomes.

Our third tool has now passed $10K MRR! We were able to hit $10k MRR this time around by just focusing on how to convert more of our free users to paid Here's how we did it: Identify what it is that the user actually wants In every product there is usually one killer feature that users love As your product gets more mature you can demonstrate value on multiple levels, but in the beginning you should just zero in on a singular delightful experience that you give to your users There are usually three issues that arise at this step: - The killer feature is too diluted amongst your other features (users get confused) - The killer feature is given too abundantly on a free plan (your users bankrupt you) - The killer feature is behind a paywall You can increase your free to paid conversion by identifying what the killer feature is of your product and reducing time to reaching this feature as much as possible Timing of when to paywall Since you’ve discovered your killer feature, now you want to start A/B testing when to throw a paywall You can make educated guesses on when to paywall people, perhaps you notice on average people use your product 3 times per session? You could run an A/B test of paywalling after the first generation or maybe even heavily watermarking the first generation Your framework should be: “Why do users come to my app? What is it they’re trying to accomplish? How do I demonstrate that we can clearly help them accomplish this?” Once it is apparent that you can solve their problem, generally that is the best time to paywall The Paywall itself (or upgrade modal) Small tweaks to the paywall itself can have significant downstream effects There are obvious levers you can pull: - Pricing - Duration (monthly, quarterly, annual) - Features Then there are more nuanced levers: - Displaying pricing in their local currency - Adding PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) - Changing text on buttons (Upgrade vs Go Pro vs Upgrade Now) But the best way to understand how to improve the paywall is to just sit and watch user recordings You may find that they are hit with the paywall and then they immediately click out and try to take some other action, or perhaps they click back to your landing page and try to read your testimonials In the two examples: - You could consider adding a testimonial right next to the paywall so that they don’t need to search for some proof that the product is legitimate - You could maybe allow them to take a second action and blur the result and hit them with a paywall again Immediately when a user clicks a paywall you have a short amount of time before their buying intent falters Watching user recordings gives you valuable clues as to why your users aren’t converting and allows you to address these doubts pre-emptively Payment Typically after the upgrade modal they are taken to a screen to pay This is also where you can experience leakage as people decide last minute not to put in their information The easiest way to fix 90% of problems is to simply send them to a Stripe checkout page (for web apps) We’ve acquired companies that had their own custom checkout and they always look either scammy or they’re riddled with random bugs You can do a fair amount of testing here as well, but here are some examples: - What payment options are available to them? (This matters more if you’re selling to a global audience) - Is there consistency in the name of your company displayed on Stripe vs the name of your product? - Did you display the annual price broken down as monthly payments? Are users shocked when they see the annual price when they get to the Stripe page? The conversion flow is pretty fascinating to me because people spend so much time trying to create an amazing experience for their users and then their company fails because nobody paid for it If you’ve created something valuable you should be bullish on trying to get it into as many hands as possible, and this is not possible if you’re continually bleeding cash I want to end with the Naval quote: “Don’t make things so you can make money, make money so you can make things” I write these posts not so that you can solely maximize revenue, but because revenue serves as a vehicle to keep improving your product and actualizing your goals Hope this helped!

Two years ago I woke up to my friends frantically messaging me that a huge competitor just entered my space I opened Instagram to see that a brand new AI writing product somehow partnered with iShowSpeed and David Dobrik to give away 10 teslas just to promote the launch of their product I was impressed that they not only secured Speed and Dobrik for a partnership, but that it was actually going extremely viral Their marketing campaign lasted for weeks where Dobrik and Speed would personally FaceTime random people and give away Teslas It was difficult to not root for their success when such charismatic people were promoting the product with such generous activities To make matters worse, their product was pretty good for an early-stage team and they had a sophisticated marketing strategy + a large budget, so for the next 6 months I considered them to be one of our most competent competitors But tragically for them, cracks started to form Their organic social accounts slowly descended into views purgatory, their product moved at a snail’s pace, and slowly but surely their momentum stopped entirely I just tried their site today and their product is completely unusable I see a lot of founders complain that they can’t get anywhere because they don’t have an audience, don’t have capital, or don’t have the right connections I sympathize with that, but this is a great example of how none of that matters if you can’t iterate into a great product or solve distribution We couldn’t afford these big name partnerships so we had to scrounge TikTok for the diamonds in the rough and create our own in-house content Since their launch, Jenni grew 10x and they are now a zombie startup It can be a blessing to be a nobody, to be a college dropout, and to have no other options Necessity breeds innovation and innovation is key when you are bottlenecked by resources Throughout the years, countless other people have entered the AI writing space Jordan Peterson quote tweeted one of our influencer posts and promoted his own AI writing tool at one point Talented founders would DM me asking for advice for their ‘startup’ only to launch a Jenni clone a few months later (no hate, I respect the hustle) Unfortunately, many of these competitors are dead, and we are now only one 10x away from an IPO I’d like to think that we got here because we focused primarily on product + distribution and not on our competitors (I can see how this is ironic considering this is an entire post about a competitor, but I'll defend myself by saying 95%+ of the time is spent on our internal milestones lol) I have a clear idea on how we 10x Jenni from where we are today, and I’m excited for the day we become such a dominant market leader that we no longer receive frantic texts when a new startup starts giving away Teslas With all the hard work our team is putting in, hopefully it happens sooner rather than later :)

No I don't think so I was very doubtful any of this worked out and was generally quite anxious and stressed as I saw my income from my YouTube music channel drop every month ~2013 so I had to come up with new ways to make money I remember being extremely lost and unsure what I was doing the whole time which actually culminated in the lowest point when I returned to Netherlands in 2014 after 1 year of digital nomading in Asia, now having failed to build a life outside but also not feeling at home in my own country anymore I then left back to Asia to Bali in June 2014 I think Only when Nomad List started taking off a few months later did I feel a bit more certain but still not a lot Even then I never reached these MRR levels before AI So no I would not have imagined it I think!

Mike @Leonard_Szeliga

a year ago

@levelsio When you were alone in your Airbnb in Bali ten years ago, hacking away, did you think this MRR was possible? Amazing man.

1 1 40 226K 8

The people who believe in you most get the worst version of you The true believers “invest” their time/love/affection early, often when it isn’t clear that you’re deserving of it The VCs who invest in the first few startups that you burn to the ground, the cofounders who expect you to take care of the “business-side” when you have no “business” experience, and the team that has to patiently build features only for them to be thrown away shortly after launch On the personal side, your parents who loved you during your most troublesome and rebellious years, your friends who forgave you for deprioritizing them, and your romantic partners who also forgave you for deprioritizing them (but really shouldn’t have) The very first people who believed in me will likely get no financial upside from the compounding years of my startup experience For example, anyone tied to any of my previous startups I built excluding my most recent one got nothing out of them I lashed out at my friends/partners because my external successes didn’t mirror what I felt I should be accomplishing It’s unfair that these people who really are the most deserving of the upside don’t get anything I’ll do my best personally to try and re-balance the karmic scales over time, but some things cannot be fixed retroactively These realizations have made me much more liberal with how much I take care of the people who were there for me in the early stages of my life This is primarily parents, early mentors, and friends The gravity of regret is powerful, so I try to examine it outside of orbit, far enough to not get dragged in I feel myself teetering at the edge of the atmosphere, so I’m going to stop writing before I get pulled all the way in Thanks to everyone who believed in me early (and happy fathers day dad, love you)