Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

Dallas, Texas Joined June 2010

Tweets

11K
Followers

158
Following

594
Likes

12K

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

2 hours ago

@joelporsch I do not understand this take because just make your Rondo circle bigger and suddenly passes across our breaking lines and passing through a channel

0 0 0 73 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

2 hours ago

@joelporsch Yeah…creating learning how to anticipate passing triangles is for losers 😂

0 0 0 111 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

2 hours ago

@bigten would you coordinate the broadcast of the “Real Clock” during games, shared with the stadium and network? It seems like a modest ask that clock everyone is looking at in the stadium is the one that controls the timing of the game. Idea of ref-only time is anti countdown

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

3 hours ago

@NotEvolution1

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

3 hours ago

@NotEvolution1 A child repeating adult creationist claims & memorized talking points, isn’t “debunking” anything . Nearly every claim here displays a misunderstanding. Cambrian animals did not all appear simultaneously, and they had Precambrian predecessors. Piltdown Man was a deliberate fraud

1 0 0 9 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

3 hours ago

@Fernan29103 @InspiringPhilos Meaning is not a self-interpreting object contained entirely within written marks; readers construct interpretations, but linguistic conventions and historical evidence constrain which constructions are plausible.

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

3 hours ago

@Fernan29103 @InspiringPhilos ^^On top of a male. Paul criticizes same-sex acts as unrestrained flesh lust and a rejection of natural sexuality. Paul does, “oh and women also” in Romans 1:26 but he never specifies what women were exchanging their natural “use” for. No consideration of egalitarian relations.

1 0 0 6 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

4 hours ago

@ChrisRojas4081 @InspiringPhilos Non sequitur

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

13 hours ago

@Fernan29103 @InspiringPhilos So Dan can coherently say that an evangelical interpretation is wrong, not all same-sex behaviors are condemned by anyone because interpretations can be evaluated against linguistic, historical, and textual evidence.

3 0 0 27 0

View Details

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His) @cpchambe

13 hours ago

@Fernan29103 @InspiringPhilos Your gay sex example actually demonstrates this negotiation: Leviticus prohibits particular male–male sexual acts. Paul condemns arsenokoitai in a very different Greco-Roman way. Neither writer discusses “homosexuality” as a sexual orientation or describes same-sex marriage.