cfrob @cfrob1

@_steven_4200 @AutisticClip He's not crashing out, he's laughing at her like he does when an insane karen gets arrested.

@Wvrmblut @AutisticClip Haha Asmon a fed, that's the funniest thing I've heard all week! You must not know anything about him.

@AutisticClip Problem with that is they don't want us. Most of them are retarded leftists who want to commit cultural suicide. If we come in and force them to stop, we'd have to permanently take over, otherwise they'd go right back to it when we leave. Israel actually wants it.

@jfmaquine @AutisticClip We have no interest in getting involved in your cultural suicide to be honest. Can't help someone who doesn't want to be helped. We wish you would take your heads out of your asses and join the real world again, but not much hope of that happening.

@skinnnnnnnner @LowLevelPriest @AutisticClip Firstly, Fuentes is talking about Western Europe, not Eastern. You know, the side that caused WWII. Secondly, the US is more right-wing than Western Europe. Progressivism is a Western-wide cancer, but it's strongest in Europe and Canada.

@LegendzPiko @AutisticClip You're an idiot and wrong on both points. I live in México and the US. Te apuesto que tu CI ni es la mitad del mio.

@Warrenb22845217 @MayraFlores4TX If amnesty is granted every few years because people don't have the stomach to force people to leave who appear on the surface to be responsible and civil (besides the fact they broke a law as their first act in our country), then the law effectively doesn't exist.

@Warrenb22845217 @MayraFlores4TX There is. They can self-deport & their chances for getting back in legally are greatly improved. They're also paid $2600 exit bonus along with travel costs. We can't simply forgive the fact that they broke the rule, because that incentivizes more to do the same.

@DnkLibertarian @1982Logos @scrowder I'm not anti-Israel, I'm not particularly pro either, but if you forced me to pick a side, I'd choose the one that is fighting against terrorists that want to kill us. But your point is also a good one - seems like most anti-Israels go down rabbit holes until they sound loony.

@___kaitlyyn @m4shuq @RealCandaceO By "ongoing investigation", I think you mean that she decided to believe all this without evidence and then waited for her nutjob followers to invent the "evidence" and send it to her after the fact. She and her audience are feeding off each others' delusions in a demented cycle.

@1982Logos @scrowder Yeah, and I bet the jews are also responsible for your inability to maintain good relationships and pay your bills on time, huh? While we're making claims with no evidence, just simply that we feel are true, I'm now the dictator of the world, so you better not disagree with me.

@GenBlessings99 @MattWalshBlog @MattWallace888 Not surprising that the guy who doesn't know how to tag correctly or spell "whine" doesn't understand the concept of "per capita".

@LisaHartma26242 @KingOffX_ Translation: "I have no real evidence to back up my claim, but I'm going to believe it anyway, because it aligns with the rest of my worldview."

@LisaHartma26242 @KingOffX_ All those things make perfect sense if Robinson did it, but you don't care. You've got a feeling that something is wrong and you're going to trust that over any facts presented to you. Candace cast an anti-logic spell on all of you: "we don't know know, but we know."

@ColbucD27912 @flint1984_ @realalexclark She's right, there is a big difference between labeling laws around food and other goods

@THuffmanSeymour @DataRepublican All you're saying is there are some things you don't understand. Do you really think that fact alone should outweigh material evidence presented in court that he did?

@Judges445 @pynyckl @realalexclark Good video, thanks!

@pynyckl @Judges445 @realalexclark Yeah, so, there's no use trying to reason with someone like you, but thank you for proving my point. "Erika Kirk lied about her dating history so therefore she orchestrated her husband's death" is a perfect example of how you guys "connect the dots". Not worth my time.

Hello Mrs. Owens, You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk." He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it. You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it. You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days. You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater. You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu. You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name. And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely. Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him. So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath. Every single one failed. I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow. The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts. I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.