Sanity-Sux @bootneck

This is absolutely horrendous. These people need to face the full force of the law.

Young Bob @YoungBobRB

2 hours ago

Someone has submitted footage of what happened. Look at how a gang of foreigners just randomly begin hitting and punching me. This was the first incident. After that, I tried to retrieve my things, and they tried to attack me a second time. Then the police arrived.

2K 3K 13K 1.2M 1K

According to this Labour Government 16 and 17 year olds are mature enough to vote, but not to serve on a jury. That is an "adult duty" apparently. They are old enough to vote, but are now subject to a government-mandated social media curfew at 8.30pm. The only consistent thing about Labour's votes at 16 policy is the blatant party political self interest.

Labour must go as soon as possible

Alpha Wolf 🐺 @Crazyunfill94

2 days ago

In Manchester, England, Muslims were loudly blasting the Quran on loudspeakers. A British woman stepped up and said, “This is England, a Christian country! I don’t want to hear the Quran!” For just saying that, the police arrested her on charges of causing a public order

431 2K 6K 543K 303

Angela Eagle. 34 years of being wrong. 34 years of voting for every open-border policy, every EU power grab, every failed immigration scheme. She watched record boat arrivals on her watch and called it 'complexity.' She scrapped the Rwanda deterrent and replaced it with... nothing. She has never had an independent thought in 450 parliamentary votes. Not one rebellion. Not one principle she wouldn't sell for a promotion. And now she's Security Minister. The woman who couldn't secure a border is securing the entire realm. The woman who never stood up to her party is standing up to terrorists. The woman who failed at every metric is measuring success for the rest of us. This isn't government. This is jobs for the girls/boys who never questioned the boys/girls. 34 years of failure, rewarded with a Damehood and a promotion. Angela Eagle isn't a security expert. She's a careerist who secured the only thing that matters to her: her own advancement.

Home Office @ukhomeoffice

2 days ago

Welcome to the Home Office @angelaeagle.

2K 117 612 506K 33

What a disgraceful tweet from anyone let alone the Leader of a British Political party. They should have got much longer in my view. Attacking a police officer is totally abhorrent as a starter!

Zack Polanski @ZackPolanski

3 days ago

Gut wrenching to see four young people jailed for direct action against an arms supplier to Israel. Years in prison for protesting to save lives in Gaza, with 'terrorism' used despite no jury convicting them of it. A truly dangerous attack on the right to protest.

10K 7K 28K 6.8M 1K

The man who wants to ban social media for spreading misinformation @Keir_Starmer has been community noted 27 times for lying.

The Government’s jury trial reforms are deeply unfair. Under these proposals, a repeat offender could be more likely to receive a jury trial than a first-time offender facing the same charge. David Lammy is trying to push these controversial reforms through Parliament at breakneck speed, despite repeated warnings from judges, lawyers, opposition MPs, Labour MPs and victims of crime that they will undermine public trust in the criminal justice system. Labour does not have a mandate for such a sweeping overhaul of our criminal justice system. We cannot let the Government get away with restricting our ancient right to trial by jury. Read more below 👇

Now it emerges Hadi Alodid was born in Saudi Arabia, got a boat across the Med from Libya before flying into Ireland from Paris. First he was Somali, then Sudanese, then Saudi. First he flew directly from Khartoum, now he got a boat to EU. We have NO IDEA who these people are!

The year is 1949. The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain. The year is 1956. Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over. The year is 1966. A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots. The year is 1979. Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005. The year is 1985. Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning. The year is 1992. There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with. So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now. Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one. It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.

This really worries me A month ago in Wales I suffered a ruptured aneurysm in my abdomen. I lost over 2 units of blood But the Welsh ambulance service refused to send an ambulance. I was still breathing so apparently didn't need one I spent 7 hours lying on the ground in a car park. Every time I moved I threw up from the pain. The owners of the car park called 999 6x One of the people there was a fireman. He couldn't believe that 999 treated each call as a separate incident and couldn't see the details or link to previous calls. He was frustrated because they could see I was seriously ill but you can't see internal bleeding and so there was no way to persuade 999 that it actually was an emergency Eventually my husband arrived by taxi, journey of more than 3 hours from our home He gave me my pain meds (the car park people were worried about liability and I was too ill to get them myself). This meant I was able to crawl into the car and he drove me to A&E He got me into a wheelchair. We waited 75 minutes to see a doctor. I was shivering, heaped with blankets and threw up all over the floor As soon as a doctor looked at me I was taken straight to resus. The next day I was transfered by blue light ambulance to another hospital, had a blood transfusion and spent 5 days on the high dependency unit If my husband hadn't been able to come and look after me I have no idea how I would have survived. As it was I nearly didn't I would not have been able to get myself to hospital nor would I have been able to log into some digital triage system This scheme seems to assume if you're seriously ill you'll arrive by ambulance and if not you're well enough to navigate a digital portal My experience suggests that's a dangerous assumption A week later, back home in England I had another ruptured aneurysm. This time an ambulance came in 2 hours and again I was taken straight to resus It wasn't the same because I had a recent diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm so we could tell 999 I was almost certainly bleeding internally. But I was too ill to get myself down the stairs and out to the car. We still needed that ambulance and I still wouldn't have been able to fiddle around with an ipad Proper triage REQUIRES an actual doctor to look at the patient. It takes a matter of minutes to differentiate between a life threatening emergency and not a life threatening emergency. That's not minutes to get a diagnosis but to know that the person is stable or not stable and if not that needs immediate attention Seriously ill people can't do it themselves. It doesn't matter how smart or articulate they are normally. Or how tough. Expecting people to manage their own emergency care isn't what a modern health service should do telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/1…

This is a painful, car crash interview. Peter Kyle: I believe in the plan! Naga Munchetty: When did you seen the plan? Kyle: I haven’t. Naga: Did Mr Healey and Al Carns see the plan? Kyle: Of course! Naga: So they’ve both seen the plan and resigned.

Clueless Labour No progress can be made till they're gone

HJB News @HJB_News__

4 days ago

The UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood recently said “the people you see holding the English flag are mostly WHITE EDL and BAD people”. She is responsible for UK borders, migration and national security.

391 981 3K 110K 80

If you pay people not to work and heavily tax the ones that do, please don’t be surprised when you have an ‘unemployment crisis’

The Telegraph @Telegraph

6 days ago

Rachel Reeves will reimburse British firms £5,000 per foreign worker in a bid to make the country more attractive despite the UK’s growing youth unemployment crisis 🖇️ telegraph.co.uk/money/jobs/wor…

865 481 1K 1.7M 516

BREAKING NEWS: Australia's public broadcaster ABC News just accused @elonmusk of ''inciting racial tension'' in Belfast because he did not censor footage showing a Sudanese refugee attempting to behead someone. They're angrier at Elon than at the stabber.

76 of the 532 Crown Court courtrooms across England and Wales are sitting empty today. That’s 14%. At the same time, David Lammy is spearheading plans to slash our right to trial by jury, blaming jury trials for the Crown Court backlog of more than 80,000 cases — despite having no credible evidence to support his claim. If David Lammy gets his way, more people will be jailed for exercising their right to free speech. Open the courts. Save jury trials.

Ich liebe alles daran ❤️ Die #Allianz fordert 300.000 £ von #ProPalästina-Aktivisten, ihnen droht lebenslange Insolvenz! Ein britisches Gericht hat dem deutschen Versicherer Allianz gestattet, eine Zivilklage in Höhe von fast 300.000 £ gegen sechs Pro-Palästina-Aktivisten zu verfolgen; gleichzeitig wurde der Antrag abgelehnt, das Verfahren bis zum Abschluss der gegen sie laufenden Strafprozesse auszusetzen. Gegen die Aktivisten liegen separate Strafanzeigen vor, da sie bei Protesten in den Jahren 2024 und 2025 rote Farbe auf Allianz-Büros gesprüht und dabei einen Sachschaden von 38.000 £ verursacht haben sollen. Während sich der reine Sachschaden auf 38.000 £ beläuft, umfasst die Gesamtforderung der Klage fast 300.000 £. Die Allianz hat weitere 200.000 £ für „Reputationsschäden und geschäftliche Beeinträchtigungen“ geltend gemacht. Die Gruppe erklärte, sie habe das Unternehmen aufgrund dessen versicherungstechnischer Verbindungen zum israelischen Rüstungskonzern Elbit Systems ins Visier genommen. Da es sich um ein Zivilverfahren handelt, haben die Aktivisten keinen Anspruch auf die finanzielle Prozesskostenhilfe oder den Schutz durch ein Geschworenengericht, wie sie im Strafrecht üblich sind; sie sind somit gezwungen, sich ohne formelle Rechtsvertretung zu verteidigen. Etwaige zugesprochene Schadensersatzsummen würden direkt aus den Ersparnissen und künftigen Gehältern der Beklagten beglichen; die Klage droht sie somit in lebenslange finanzielle Not und den Bankrott zu treiben.

THE DOSSIER #13: Rachel Reeves – The Counterfeit Chancellor Born 13 February 1979 in Lewisham. PPE from Oxford and LSE. The factory that produces frauds who falsify their way to power. You claimed publication in the Journal of Political Economy. Your Who's Who entry. One of the most prestigious economics journals in the world. You lied. Your paper appeared in the European Journal of Political Economy, similarly named, vastly less prestigious. You traded on name confusion. You claimed elite credentials you never earned. You claimed a "decade at the Bank of England." Six years. September 2000 to December 2006. You inflated your experience by 67%. The "decade" that built your credibility was a lie. You called yourself an "economist." Then quietly changed it to "retail banking" when exposed. Administrative support handling complaints. Not an economist. Not a technocrat. A paper-pusher with edited LinkedIn profiles and fabricated journal entries. You claimed you "wrote" a book. "Copy and Paste Chancellor." Plagiarized content from other authors. When caught, your spokesman blamed "administrative errors by her team." The coward's excuse. Blame the staff for your own falsehoods. Labour Together bought your intellect for £31,698.36. "Research and writing services." A think tank paid the Shadow Chancellor to write her speeches. They purchased your thoughts. You sold your mind before you sold your soul. FGS Global gave you £12,929 for a reception. Corporate lobbyists. Private water CEOs. Private equity multimillionaires. Israel lobbyists. Private health investors. Your Chancellor's robes are stitched with their logos. Juliet Rosenfeld bought your wardrobe. £7,500 for clothing. You called her an "old friend" who wanted you to "look smart." The Chancellor took dress money from donors while pensioners froze. You hiked employer National Insurance. 50,000 jobs died. Businesses fled to America. To Europe. You stood there and lied. "The economy is fine." The OBR cut forecasts. The pound fell. You blamed the Tories. You froze winter fuel payments. Pensioners sat in the cold. You created a £22 billion black hole. Let welfare balloon £16 billion more. Broke your own fiscal rules. Twice. Bond markets lost confidence. Capital fled. Skilled workers followed. You spend billions on foreign aid and climate targets while British high streets empty. While businesses board up. Then you call anyone who notices "far-right." The markets see through you. The world sees through you. Britain pays. Open borders. Flooded labour markets. Wages suppressed. While you tax the working class into oblivion. You are the most unpopular Chancellor in history. Net favourability: -59. Seventy-one percent unfavourable. The worst ratings since tracking began in 1976. You beat every Chancellor who ever held the red box. You are the gold standard of failure. You broke down in the Commons. The tearful appearance. The "killjoy demeanour" your advisers thought would build trust. The public saw weakness. The markets saw chaos. You are Vice-Chair of Labour Friends of Israel. You abstained on Palestinian statehood. You support the Auschwitz-Birkenau Foundation while blocking recognition of Palestinian statehood. The hypocrisy is international. You own a house in South London. While you represent Leeds West and Pudsey. While you tax the North into poverty. The commute from your London home is longer than your commitment to your voters. You are not an economist. You are not a Chancellor. You are a serial fabricator who lied about journals, employment duration, job titles, and book authorship. You are a fraud in a borrowed suit, bought by donors, crying in Parliament while Britain burns. Your CV is ash. Your credibility is gone. Your Chancellorship is a monument to deception. Permanent exile awaits, Rachel Reeves. Congratulations. You are The Dossier. Your betrayal of Britain is now complete.

Well the pattern is now set: Atrocity Condemn in weakest terms possible Calls for calm Angry scenes Family of victim used Full force of the law New laws limiting everyone's freedom Ignore problem that caused atrocity

This is nothing to do with English Law, or the traditional legal process

Nick Timothy MP @NJ_Timothy

5 days ago

This is the woman David Lammy wants to choose our judges. She says merit alone should NOT determine judicial appointments. “Merit is crucial but so is a focus on diversity."

1K 3K 10K 522K 669

The Border Stays Open. The State Will Close the Conversation. Before the fires in Belfast had been extinguished, the government had identified the threat. Not the border. Not the system that granted Hadi Alodid legal residency in seven months without a verifiable European asylum history. Not the Albanian gangs advertising guaranteed passage to England on TikTok this morning. The threat, as defined by this government, was the conversation. Liz Kendall announced on Wednesday that social media firms would face new legal curbs during times of crisis. Platforms would be required to remove incendiary content more quickly when tensions were heightened. The definition of crisis and the definition of incendiary would be set by ministers. On the same day, Jonathan Hall, the government's own terror watchdog, said he had raised the national security dimension of mass migration with the government and received no reply. One question got legislation within forty-eight hours. The other got silence. Stephen Ogilvie lost an eye on a Belfast street. The government's legislative response targets the people describing what happened. This is not new. After the summer 2024 riots the same reflex operated. People were jailed for social media posts within days of the disorder. The sentences handed to those who wrote the posts sat in the same range as those who burned the buildings. The machinery of the state was directed at speech about disorder rather than the conditions producing it. Belfast is the same pattern at higher intensity. The border stays open. Discussion of what happens at the border will be suppressed more quickly next time. The British asylum system did not malfunction in the case of Hadi Alodid. It performed. Sudan to Paris. Paris to Dublin. Dublin to Belfast by bus. Asylum claimed in February 2023. Refugee status granted by September. Legal right to remain until 2028. There is no French record of him as an asylum seeker. The Irish government will not say how he entered Ireland. None of that prevented the system from processing him correctly by its own rules. The rules are the problem. The government has no intention of changing them. Albanian gangs are advertising the same route on TikTok today. Filmed inside Dublin airport. Guaranteed passage. Seven thousand pounds payable on arrival. Operation Gull has arrested more than 900 people using it in a year and the advertisements continue. Enforcement is cataloguing this. It is not closing it. Jonathan Hall, the government's own independent reviewer of terror legislation, said immigration must be treated as a national security issue. He said he had raised whether migrants from certain countries presented elevated risks of serious violence. The government responded with silence. The terror watchdog, a King's Counsel appointed to scrutinise national security law, is recording not a political failure but an institutional one. The question was asked through proper channels. Nobody answered. The pattern is coherent even if the government will not name it. The terror watchdog raises the national security dimension of mass migration and hears nothing. The gangs film themselves inside Dublin airport and advertise openly. The border operates as it always has. And ministers announce that posts about the consequences will be removed more quickly next time. That is not an oversight. That is a set of priorities. A government that cannot close a border it knows is being exploited, cannot answer its own terror watchdog, and cannot explain how a man with no verifiable asylum history acquired British residency in seven months has chosen a fourth option. Control the account. Leave the causes intact. "Liz Kendall announced on Wednesday that social media firms would face new legal curbs during times of crisis."