Arvind @arvinddotdev

22 | ai engineer @mudstack (a16z) | contributor adding features @kubernetes oss | busy shipping projects and reading papers | agents are cool, ig? arvindparekh.tech Boston, Massachusetts Joined November 2022

Tweets

3K
Followers

269
Following

580
Likes

7K

Arvind @arvinddotdev

7 hours ago

New York City, I’m in you

1 3 50 2K 6

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

9 minutes ago

@vanshnyc Wait wdym? 😭

0 0 0 1 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

5 hours ago

@vanshnyc Creamy welcome 👀

1 0 1 22 1

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

3 days ago

@RhysSullivan our minds probably haven’t evolved yet to grasp exponentiality. reminds me of something i wrote about compounding a while back arvindparekh.tech/writing/compou…

0 0 2 182 0

View Details

Sam Lambert @samlambert

4 days ago

all this ny vs sf discourse is so boring. just go to both places and have fun.

11 4 98 8K 2

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

btw, this is charles darwin's daily work schedule 👇🏻 embarrassingly light by modern productivity standards darwinproject.ac.uk/commentary/cur…

0 0 1 25 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

The sum-product conjecture in mathematics has been disproven! This is just weeks after AI disproved the unit distance conjecture, and although this one was disproved by humans, it turns out they used a lot of the mathematical ideas from the previous AI disprove-ment. We live in such fun times!

0 0 1 48 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@gregpr07 I love it! Do you not find it lacking the level of cursor’s autocomplete though?

1 0 0 652 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

5 days ago

NYC tech week people - how are you doing!?

3 1 19 582 3

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@RhysSullivan can't wait for agi to start acting human

0 0 0 81 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@jordienr "piece ofs" > completes the task "thanks, you're the best!"

0 0 3 81 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@stephenmruiz @AnthropicAI @Gladwell @GammaApp @justbobbibrown Anthropic didn’t have a pure tech event in Boston - this one’s a steal!

0 0 1 25 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@guaranteed_karm that’s the way we like it!

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@SebCornelius looks great! spins up as a desktop popup?

0 0 1 35 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

6 days ago

okay this is coming out to be really good!

Arvind @arvinddotdev

a week ago

cooking something new 👀 coming soon: omnia code

0 0 1 113 0

0 1 1 88 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

4 days ago

@denpoint1 💪🏻

0 0 1 19 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

5 days ago

isn't btrfs essentially git, but for your entire filesystem?

0 1 1 25 0

View Details

Arvind @arvinddotdev

5 days ago

i have too much time on my hand, and i was wondering: does the verb "can" mean probability, or surety? when someone says, "this can heavily impact you", do they mean, this has a non-zero, and maybe even a highly-probable chance to impact you, or that, it for sure will impact you? a few more examples: "you can leave" - shows permission "water can freeze" - shows ability "it can happen" - shows possibility the last one is interesting, because it's more like saying, "for all i know, it happens". it is more of a testament to the speaker's uncertainty, rather than the world's structure. i guess the more i think about this, i realize my question could be incorrect. "can" could be more about the logical status of a proposition (possible vs impossible). probability is a quantification layered on top of possibility. you can't have probability without possibility (which "can" denotes), but possibility doesn't give you probability (it doesn't say where on the range of probability it sits: 0 < P <= 1).