Jagan Mohan @altvu

@shaandelhite Opposition Leaders of almost every country is a patriot. Our Leader of Opposition will try to sell India off in return for support to come to power. The Congress has a MoU with the Communist Party of China, remember? Signed by Rahul Gandhi himself.

So if a LLM produces a book much like the Koran... what happens?

The Hindu Question: Why are some seeking to reduce the Hindu-Sikh relationship into hostility? Even within the Dharmic traditions, we have philosophical, scriptural differences between panths, sampradayas and schools of thought, nevertheless, an Unity. The Unity is shared truths of: Dharma, Karma, Samsara, Sangha and Moksha (Nibbana/Mukti, etc). A south Indian SriVaishnavite would be happy to share the devotional verses of the Guru Granth as their own.

MajorSammerToor @MajorSammerToor

2 weeks ago

The Sikh Question: Why Is Everyone Trying to Define Us Except Sikhs? For 500+ years, Sikhs have stood with an identity carved not by convenience, politics, or pressure — but by the vision of our Gurus and the sacrifices of our ancestors. Yet even today, everyone seems eager to

0 12 42 4K 6

You are missing the grand pov. Only in Hinduism, we don't have 'sermons' from the 'pulpit' or friday prayers. When Hindus go to temple, they go for darshan, not for advice on conducting life. But, somewhere, we need to preach art of living too. There is no harm in adding worldly issues. In fact, we need it more so that it becomes refined by practice and evolution through public acceptance pressures.

@veejaysai The last line is important, you can't measure the immeasurable. Especially not as 'one' or 'three' like some try to do.

@aswinsastrology @veejaysai By dog, astrologers talkin about critical thinking? Wow.

This 'Illuminati are ruling the world' tinfoil conspiratorialist anti semitic crypto christian needs to understand that we worship Gods in different forms and stages. We worship the Balamurugan (of course, bachelor), Youthful Murugan, the commander of the Armies of Goodness, the married Murugan, etc. Same for Ganesha. In North or South, Ganesha is the eldest. For us, our Gods are not limited by mere numbers like Islam which counts its god as 'one', and christianity which counts it as 'three'. We have no numbers because our God cannot be counted like objects.

@srijanpalsingh Indian Government does not make available Indian Maps with correct Jammu and Kashmir territory easily while Pakistan distributes their maps in multiple formats.

@Jeba_here @fathimafarhanaS Murugan is our God. Not a human ancestor. You are free to claim Jesus as your ancestor though, we have no objections. Murugan is 'not risen to be a deity' like your zombie who needs death as an answer to sin. He was always our God. x.com/maa_bhaishiiH/…

Rama Seshan Chandrasekaran @maa_bhaishiiH

2 weeks ago

🚨 Murugan is back in the headlines : debates exploding over whether he’s a pan-Indian god, a Tamil ancestor, or something else entirely. Most people think this is some new Church “appropriation” tactic. It isn’t. This is a time-tested ancient strategy that Christianity has used

48 543 1K 33K 328

🚨 Murugan is back in the headlines : debates exploding over whether he’s a pan-Indian god, a Tamil ancestor, or something else entirely. Most people think this is some new Church “appropriation” tactic. It isn’t. This is a time-tested ancient strategy that Christianity has used for nearly 2,000 years to dismantle pagan traditions by saying : “Your gods were once men.” Around 300 BCE, the Greek pagan writer Euhemerus claimed the Olympian gods were not divine at all ; they were just deified kings and culture heroes whose exploits got exaggerated over time. His doctrine is called Euhemerism now. Pagans of his own time largely rejected Euhemerism as impious. But early Christian writers loved the idea. They weaponised it. Church-fathers admiringly note that the mocking that Euhemerus received was undeserved, because Christians believed that pagans like Euhemerus had at least seen through popular error of the pagan religion (worshipping men as gods) even if they hadn’t reached the full truth of the Gospel of the one true God. Church Fathers like Athenagoras (2nd century) and Clement of Alexandria openly argued that the Greek and Egyptian gods were simply historical kings who had been turned into deities by grateful (or fearful) subjects. Their strategy was : Concede they once existed as humans → deny their divinity → rewrite their myths as “history” instead of religion. This “euhemerist” move gave Christians a powerful triple advantage: 1. It explained temples, statues, and festivals without admitting real gods. 2. It let them preserve and enjoy pagan myths and classics as mere literature. 3. It justified the destruction or conversion of sacred sites (any human however great does not deserve worship which belongs only to the one true God) The same playbook later traveled to medieval Scandinavia, the Spanish conquest of the Americas, and now appears in modern India. In my latest Substack article, I trace this exact Christian Euhemerist tactic from ancient Greece and Egypt, through the Patristic period, the Medieval period, and Colonial eras, right up to today’s debates around Murugan and other Hindu deities. I quote the primary sources (including bolded key passages from the Church Fathers) so you can see the strategy in their own words. If you want to understand why these “gods were once men/ancestors” arguments keep resurfacing — and why they feel so familiar in the Indian context — this piece connects the dots across two millennia. Read it here : open.substack.com/pub/ramaseshan… What do you think is this latest fad of Murugan being an ancestor after reading this article — novel historical revisionism? Nah, a recurring and time-tested pattern worth recognising, right?

@Vtxt21 The population must take responsibility for throwing garbage everywhere that clogs storm water drainage canals. Paying tax is not a protection against gravity, climate change induced extreme weather, etc. Insurance is.

@bhatia_nachiket Either the hospitals will refuse to admit patients or forcibly discharge them to send them to Government Hospitals or they will stop administering medications, devices and consumables to limit losses. The Government can however, limit the payment of services, but not goods.

Chinese one-upping their iron-brothers, the Pakistanis.

@KanojiaPJ Eggs, Ink, Cake, etc are all historical and well-entrenched non-violent symbols of talking to power taught to us by the leftists of the world. Let's hear those egg throwing youth's point of view too.

@Dilliwalanerd33 Privilege and Hypocrisy.

Says the Pakistani whose nation couldn't even survive half a century without one murderous minority genociding the majority. Forget Indus and IVC, Pakistan can't claim its original territory of its own creation in 1947.

Cyborg 🇵🇰🍁 @cyborg_reborn

3 weeks ago

There was no such thing as "India" 2,100 years ago. It was the land of the Indus, which is ancient Pakistan.

759 89 796 221K 60

@RanaAyyub > count me out Because you are muslim?

@kabhi008 @LiveLawIndia Where exactly did I claim that 'self declared affidavit is to prove that 'he'[sic] is an Indian citizen'? Since you are not being intellectually honest and simply twisting words, I will not continue this conversation.

A person who holds an Indian passport is a citizen of India, yes. But the passport itself is a derivative of the citizenship status, not certificate of it.

Live Law @LiveLawIndia

3 weeks ago

To Say Passport Is Only A Travel Document Is Complete Misreading Of Law: Justice Lokur Criticises MEA Stand Referring to the Preamble of the Passports Act, ex-SC Judge Justice Lokur noted that the legislation was enacted "to provide for the issue of passports and travel

42 225 589 34K 36

@plot_twistttt Stay poor, Ignoramus. And keep blaming the whole world for it, especially your parents.