drakored @_drako

Proud father to 3 girls and 2 boys, husband, and a Solution Architect. My days are spent full of love and code. Joined June 2009

Tweets

2K
Followers

401
Following

819
Likes

1K

drakored @_drako

5 months ago

@ToAmused @sandrabrechtgm1 @WillGill867979 @EvasTeslaSPlaid That said, balance and flow state in the two parties isn’t happening. We need a renaissance in balanced systems with an emphasis on neither stopping progression or inflicting too much risk vs reward. Neither side should slow to the crawl we have. It’s time to rebalance things.

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

5 months ago

@ToAmused @sandrabrechtgm1 @WillGill867979 @EvasTeslaSPlaid Not sure I agree. The point of the duslity of liberal/progressives and conservatives/libertarians is to balance out the energy in the system between moving forward and slowing down for proper balancing of energy output and intended results. They’re balancing ideals, not polarity.

1 0 0 15 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @yigitkguc @moments_light @perrikaryal Any known or reported positive impact to vestibular migraines and/or vertigo? How complex is the setup?

1 0 0 23 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz That’s getting into too many layers for now, but abstracted away from that scenario to a text based prompt it’s going to require a lot of rethinking and balancing, and honestly humanity is still learning and at various stages of awareness needed. How would you reframe the arch?

1 0 0 7 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz Train those two across a vast amount of intent and persona risk profiles, curiosity or necessity analysis, hypothetical abstractions and intent to jailbreak detection. Users have to provide ethos to get info. Many layers of local legality etc etc. Many complex layers needed.

0 0 1 123 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz Balancing that system with relative balance symmetry of the optimistic-ish clarity seeking and user intent and safety state analysis ongoing from historical and context of convo. E.g. if you reach for a cops gun jokingly, he won’t answer (m)any questions for you on guns, intent

2 0 0 6 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz Introspection and an isolated layer that mimics gauge symmetries and layers based on risk types and reflective live output analysis. Topic shift into questionable territory and it responds with injected context adjustment scaling up to overriding output to get clarity or set tone

1 0 0 9 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz Exactly, and having a probability bias of avoiding something generally leads you to it. It’s self fulfilling prophecy and manifesting your own fear, also human confirmation bias acts as an introspective lens deepening the drift. LLMs will need relative flex and orthogonal guards

1 0 0 8 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz Consensus reality becomes the center ground where information collapses from all entangled observers across infinite points overlapping from each perspective observer. What you see is dependent on your focus, attention, beliefs, knowledge, your observations, and bias drifts, etc.

1 0 0 6 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz The idea that data patterns don’t represent the underlying methods is a bit awkward to me. It misses out on the duality and complexity of emergent states of physics systems, and gets lost in ontological and epistemological philosophical debates about consensus and loses the plot.

1 0 0 10 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @barlowjon @SteveGrubbsVXR @ylecun @ebarenholtz If you abstracted all information into nothing more than pulses of light, and two observers entangled in a vacuum, would the resulting reality be an AND gate of the two shared “worlds”? What does this tell us if automata evolves from there into consensus reality?

1 0 0 7 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk In other words gen relativity is abs relative to the observer and their locality. Constants don’t exist, probability that local meets remote or expands more (moving toward) two nodes in an infinite probability field is more realistic, the gravity being mass of opposing fields.

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk If e=mc^2, moving closer to light speed means nigh infinite energy to get any closer to light speed. Photons are “massless” bosons that carry charge in QED fields, which interact with heat (becoming dispersive and slowing C). Distribution means more e, more m, and …. C adjusts

1 0 0 16 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk Explain why they had to reset C and force it as a constant. Even G isn’t constant and mass has to be measured across the globe and averaged to get metric accurate. C is only constant if you forget algebraic rules and perspective of energy shifting and that heat effects QED field

1 0 0 14 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk Increasing disorder is another way of saying thermodynamic shifting of energy between heat and diff states of energy. Also, C falls apart at a singularity as the informations mass shifts beyond our ability to see anymore. The system itself still moves through hyperbolic space.

1 1 0 17 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk E=mc^2 does not hold universally true unless you peg “universally” to the timespace Einstein wrote it in. Proof? Entropy dictates energy shifting chaos and order which hints waveform of information (energy) changes consistently. Delta energy means delta mass means delta on C.

1 0 0 19 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@grok @elonmusk Wouldn’t all truth be subjective to the observer and their locality and the base rules their scale, perspective, and understanding (capacity/depth of info) is able to process? For example, is a star system torn into the smallest matter or is that only from our perspective?

1 0 0 23 0

View Details

drakored @_drako

6 months ago

@Kirit_Joshi_CA @Ze_Freakk @Kekius_Sage How can you be so sure of that statement when physics has shown we can alter time and evolution of information? Time is not quite the static constant we all wish it was like sand in an hourglass steadily flowing, but rather a relativity that breaks down on both sides of Planck.