Way of Varne @WayofVarne

@SPranesh2181 @Unexplained2020 @eisenhowe8 She has. I saw an interview with her where she said that her Great Grandfather, President Eisenhower met with a ET race and signed the Greada Treaty. I think it was a News Nation with Ross Coulthart. Don’t know if she was telling the truth, but she did say it

"Earth is the Prize" | Emerging Worlds - Premieres 22 March 2026 youtube.com/shorts/D0vsnhl… via @YouTube

An Ordinary Moment Made Sacred youtube.com/shorts/Sa2OAVt… via @YouTube

🔥👽 This is REALLY good! 👽🔥 "In my view, there absolutely is an adversarial actor in our world. There is a human-engagement program underway. I don't think it's the rainbow that everyone kind of hopes that it is." ~Reed (IMO, @reedsummers7 is an unsung, VERY important voice in this community, and what he says in this clip, currently, resonates with me in a big way. Take the time to read or watch. Then we have what @rosscoulthart says about the "deliberate lifting of consciousness" and "frequency," which is more on the side of love, light and space brothers. I don't see that right now, and none of my contacts have ever mentioned it. If it's there, maybe its hands are tied with how it can help us?) ~ "Genetic interventions, cultural influence, right? Social engineering. All of these could be at play in a subversive sense. NHI is operating in a strategic silence, in a state of non-disclosure. Intelligence indicates intent, intentful engagement indicates a program. And so what is their program? We talk about the Legacy-human program. What about the non-human program? ~Reed ~ Ross: "I've been told that the United States has developed quite advanced weaponry, particularly plasma-beam technology that might, in part, have been inspired by what they've seen or recovered from non-human technology. I think, also, just to add the concern of NHI with what humanity is doing. There's also a very deliberate lifting of consciousness. And I really am struck by what Chris (Bledsoe - @chrisbledsoeufo) says about the frequency. This is something that I'm getting from so many people. That the level of intensity of public reporting of their engagement with NHI, of a clear intent by NHI, to essentially give up on governments from ever disclosing. But to raise human consciousness and awareness. "And I think they're doing this, increasingly (laughs), through direct engagement with individuals. I've got many friends and colleagues and people I've interviewed - witnesses - who've had incredible experiences. I've just been recording for a TV show, something that we're doing here in Australia, where people are inviting or summoning the phenomenon. And there seems to be an interest in the phenomenon engaging with humans much, much more overtly. And I do think that stems from a concern about us primitive monkeys playing with matches." (Were they concerned when this abduction-like event allegedly happened to Jim Semivan and his wife? Semivan: "I had a hole in the back of my neck, and my wife...unexplained bleeding for 17 days." Source: @EngagingThe's interview with Jim ~ Jim Garrison: "But Reid, speak to us about this interplay between malevolence and benevolence." Reed: "Sure, well, and you described, Jim, the first part of my life in which I was focused primarily on supporting my father, Marshall (Vian Summers and The Allies of Humanity), who had direct encounters with NHI, communications with NHI." (Was Marshall really in contact with extraterrestrial intelligence, known as The Allies of Humanity? I don't know. But a lot of what he has said rings true to me. Doesn't mean it's true. Read one transcript I did in 2021: “It’s Probably Not Human” – Elizondo, Blumenthal & The Allies Of Humanity x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~ Reed: "And my family felt the full force and impact of what that was like, as well as what comes with it ("it" being his dad's alleged contact with ET intelligence). Which is, what might be called the hitchhiker effect, the anomalous effects that attend those who have been selected by the phenomenon without their understanding or knowing why." (Add another few names to the list of people who have now said they experienced the hitchhiker effect: @jaystratton, @g_knapp, Kelleher, Davis, Bigelow, @BrandonFugal, @ThomasWinterton, Semivan, and more. That includes poltergeist-like events, shadow people, orbs, etc.) Reed: ""But my later work is really about assessing intent with a structured framework. I think we need to step back from belief systems, hopeful or fearful interpretations, and lay out the spectrum of possibilities, right? From curiosity on the left, salvation and assistance, even further on the left, to transaction, integration on the right, or even something more hostile. And in the end, intent is all about human outcomes. We can't know their consciousness. The project, in my mind right now, is not, let's set out to understand what they're like, who they are, how they think, how they cognate. That's impossible, in my perspective. But we can assess the real human outcomes that stem from the hazard and the risk and the possible threat of a non-human factor acting upon. Like a forcing, an environmental or evolutionary-forcing upon humanity at a historically-unprecedented time." (From what I have seen, whatever this is, has, overall, NOT helped humanity. If that's happening, it's going on behind the scenes. I know some experiencers report having their lives changed in a positive way, and some say they have been healed of illnesses. But others say their lives have been ruined and they've been hurt, intentionally or not, by coming in close contact with the phenomenon. Also, various people have come down with several auto-immune diseases after close contact, and some of that was detailed in the must-read book, "Skinwalkers at the Pentagon." @jakebarber2025 also mentioned that. Is it multiple intelligences with multiple intents, or one intelligence mixing in some positive outcomes as a propaganda effort? We don't know.) Reed: "And there are significant signals and indicators in the history of the phenomenon that give very good anchors for assessing intent, and for going from possibilities to probabilities and ultimately making a starting assessment, which informs the research pathway, which is the other part of my work in supporting the human institute, devising an intelligent, scientific research and investigatory citizen-led effort to uncover the phenomenon, to disclose it, to interrogate its activity, lest we just be interrogated, unknowingly, ourselves. So, a lot of good work to do there." (Interrogate the activity of the phenomenon. I really like that approach. Let's not assume anything.) Reed: "But, in my view, when you look at all that the sensor data has given us, technologically, when you corroborate that with the geographic, circumstantial [and] temporal aspects of how the phenomena appears, who it manifests to, and the considerable problem it presents to the international community and to national laws and frameworks that govern territorial sovereignty, these incursions into sensitive sites and the potential, programmatic engagement with civilians in the form of physical NHI-initiated contact - abductions - it builds a picture. It bounds those possibilities into a zone of probabilities. "And whether it's a transactional presence, whether it's an integrative or one that wants to integrate with humanity, or ultimately replace humanity, I think there are multiple possibilities at play and multiple intents at play. Although, I don't think it's the rainbow that everyone kind of hopes that it is. It's not, everything the Universe has to offer is gonna come all at once, now, and function harmoniously in our skies and oceans. No. The hostile intent will not tolerate a beneficial actor who themselves would have to arm themselves and militarily confront the hostile actor, which we do not see indications of." (My translation: If, there's a benevolent intelligence here that wants to help humanity break free from the chains of an alleged malevolent intelligence that may be using us, the benevolent force would need to somehow arm themselves in order to militarily take on this malevolent force, potentially, defeat them, and rescue us from a bad predicament. And we see no evidence of that.) Reed: "So, you know, we have analogs in our own human history to this, the natives of the new world. They looked out on the quay and they saw the ships, different flags, different vessels, and they assumed it's gotta be either the angels from the spirit realm - it has to comport to our belief system - or a variety of intentions, and we should work with and collaborate. And it may not be that way. "It's not about, it's all hostile or it's all beneficial or benevolent. In my mind, it's exo-systemic. It's an ecosystem arriving on our shores at a specific 20th-century moment in which we have detonated nuclear weapons, we have flashed the Universe with technology capability, and we have triggered an engagement event. This is really what this is. And a program to engage humanity over a longitudinal time period." (I think it was here and intersecting with us a long time before we first detonated our nukes.) Karla Turner: "We know from some of our own research that the abduction phenomenon has affected families going back four generations and that would be around the turn of the century (1900). In my husband's family, his grandmother had an encounter with a non-human entity that led her off into a swampy area where there was a period of missing before she was returned, when she was only five-years old. That was 1903. So if you think it's new and you think it's something the media has spread, you start looking into the cases and find out how far back it's goes in some of these families' generations. I know of an African American family in East Texas that has had it going on since the early 1900s and it's still going on today with that same family. Three to four generations is fairly typical." x.com/TheUfoJoe/stat… ~ Reed: "And so, we need to step back and really look at the human project of getting our act together to diplomatically engage now and in the future, to manage the NHI presence internationally, and coordinate responses, lest we divide and conquer ourselves over this issue. And that's where the reframing of disclosure as fundamentally belonging to the human species, being one that should, I think, be framed in first principles - to Karl Nell's point - with a naturalistic framework, a science-informed, data-driven framework. "And with that, we go out into the field and collect evidence on the phenomenon. We go out to where it is interacting with people. That's the key missing data set that would be necessary to inform decision makers." (We had that with AAWSAP and can have it again. Plus, the Vallée/AAWSAP Capella database of approximately 250,000 cases. Using AI and the best human minds on this planet, all of that may inform us of the intent of these alleged NHI actors.) Reed: "In my view, there absolutely is an adversarial actor in our world. There is a human-engagement program underway. And that's not the whole story, but if that is true, that should marshal our human response above all other possibilities, initially, because we may wake up in 30 years and find that we are not the human beings we used to be. Genetic interventions, cultural influence, right? Social engineering. All of these could be at play in a subversive sense." (If it's true, it should be the most important thing for human beings to address, ASAP. We need to find out now.) Reed: "And, you know, NHI is operating in a strategic silence, in a state of non-disclosure. They're operating covertly and selectively with military-defense organizations, internationally, which are already in competition." (I'd like to hear more about the claim that NHI are operating covertly and selectively with military-defense organizations. We've all heard those claims but is there evidence of that?) Reed: "And that, to me, is another one of a number of alarming signals that should just command us to take a cautionary response. And and we've gotta get out there and use the best of science, research and investigation to do reconnaissance - reconnai-science, as I call it, on behalf of the human interest, and not just national interests." Garrison: "Yeah, that's a profound way to put it, Reed. You know that we've triggered an interaction event." Reed: "And so, intelligence indicates intent, intentful engagement indicates a program. And so what is their program? We talk about the Legacy-human program. What about the non-human program? We do not query that nearly as much as we should. And in my view, disclosure. How do we get disclosure moving? If we recenter the controversy not on human actors, human governments, but on the non- human presence itself, that allows the human actors a way to rapidly and catastrophically disclose their involvements, which is what is keeping this back in part. Thank you."

Marshall Vian Summers went through his own process of vetting the Allies of Humanity as they sent their communication through him. His contact with the Allies occurred over many years and was not a simple process of accepting them without caution. As the Allies themselves have alluded to, there is great value in developing your own ability to discern the many voices in the universe. Engaging with non-human intelligence should be a careful process.

@GoldNubs @AbbottEddi5270 @JonStewartIL The Allies of Humanity are extraterrestrial beings.So why would they be anti-alien? Your logic isn’t sound. Potentially, it’s your own bias or prejudice that has shaped your perspective and lead you to an erroneous conclusion

@SaratogaArtist @planethunter56 Well said!

@UAPJames Why would the Pentagon say in 2017 that the Tic-Tac UFO, Gimbal and Go Fast videos were legit declassified footage of UAPs, that aren’t US tech nor a foreign adversary’s tech, now say it’s Lockheed made? Seems they are desperate to avoid admitting it’s alien/NHI made

@thatuapgirl I agree with the hierarchy, except for the distinction of human and ET. Some ET races are more advanced than us, some are less. Some ETs species are older races than us and are technologically more advanced but not necessarily more ethically advanced. ET or human same category

@tupacabra What do you mean by solved consciousness? Just trying to understand the post a little better

@LaRae3862 @rosscoulthart @NASA Yes, definitely a divide and conquer strategy by the NHI. We are currently more divided than we probably ever were. Spreading lies and lack of transparency is making us more divided, confused and contentious. These officials are doing a huge disservice to humanity

It’s time we stopped asking if we’re alone. And started asking: Who is already here? Why are they hiding? Why do they target our trust, our hopes, and our leaders—quietly, without consent? Discernment, not belief, is what will protect our future.

@chrisramsay52 UFO Mania is an unreliable source of information. They’ve been posting fake stuff for more than 10 years now

The greatest vulnerability of humanity in the face of non-human presence is not our technology. It’s our disunity. It’s our tendency to believe what we want to believe. It’s our assumption that visitors from beyond must be advanced—and therefore benevolent. These assumptions are being used against us. Right now.

@DanielleElfStar I’ve heard those notions for the past 25 years, your “space relatives”, raising your vibration to the 5D reality, etc. has ever come to pass. They say one thing but their actions tell a different story. It sounds like they have really captured your mind. Blessings to you

@DanielleElfStar @fringedotcom You are regurgitating NHI propaganda. I’m not anti Star-people, btw. Do you think humanity is the only race that has had wars, mistreated their people, depleted their resources or destroyed the habitability of their planet? Why are they here? They want something we have.

@DanielleElfStar @fringedotcom You can’t blame everything on the government or military. Actually, the NHI/ETs want you to blame a human cause, so you lose faith in humanity. It’s a divide and conquer strategy

@jmc_williams63 @curtis90335 @planethunter56 Would it be a fake alien invasion if they killed us off?

🌍 Contact With Other Races Is Already Happening - Not all visitors are here for humanity’s benefit. - Ethical contact requires transparency and consent. - Benevolence is shown through respect, not persuasion. - A wise world asks: Who benefits?

@JustinBush75071 @LaRae3862 @Mr_BenPrime That’s the point of this post, to compare channeled messages. Very interesting results. I agree with the analysis