Tim Ketner @TKetner

@BeanFromPA Are you sure? I read the story. You can't divide across the population for a comparative number average. Then not do the same for her passengers. It's just a hit piece. So I'm sure you're happy anyway. The jet has to be empty, flying itself for that number.

@SWoolem73929 @MailOnline Lol, the story has already been debunked. You can't divide CO2 across the population for comparison, then not divide for the passengers on the planes. That's not how it works.

@LeftistBasher Conservatives being stupid. You can't divide CO2 across the population for a number to compare, then not divide for the passengers on the jet. They gave you a number for an empty jet, flying with no one on it.

@TaylorSwiftPod Oh yeah, the story that wants you to believe that's a real number. The same people that tell us, full commercial airliners divided the CO2 across the passengers. Yet they give you a number for her jet that requires the plane to be empty of passengers. It's simple math

@TheOnlyGuru Oh yeah, that story that wants you to believe the number. Yet they tell us flying commercial with a full plane is better for the environment. But gives you an CO2 number that requires the jet to be flying with zero people in it. Seems legit...

@Phyllis21992943 Oh yeah!The people that tell you flying on a commercial plane with passengers lowers emissions. Compares average usage for each person by dividing across the population, coming up with 4 tonnes CO2. Then writes stories about celebrity jets, not once did they divide for passengers

@QistinaFaiqah To reach the number they gave. You have to fly the jet, empty. Dumbass.

@QistinaFaiqah Na, it's more like you failed math or failed to read the story. You can't divide CO2 of individual households, then not divide for her passengers. It takes 5 seconds of brain power to do the math. Her number is in the 30s, tops. Nice try with your deceptive bullshit though!

@UNILAD Damn this is as bad as Ulilad's bullshit CO2 emissions story where they gave a number of an empty jet flying. They averaged across households, then didn't average for her passengers. Fucking unilad is a shitbag organisation.

@dee_rskull They gave you a number for an empty jet flying by itself. That's how ridiculous ulilad is. You know why, because they know their audience is stupid and easy to fool.

@Crypto_CAL1 @dee_rskull Na, you can't math is all. Fucking lazy

@dee_rskull Dumbfuq, did you read the story? Unilad lies to you. They divided CO2 for people in a household, then not divide for her passengers. Learn to fact check a fucking story. Math never lies

@orbitoloffy You're an idiot. Lol

@heb__here Or you could be smart enough to do math and see the blatant lie in the story. You can't divide CO2 for the population, then not divide for her passengers unless it's intentional.

@MeetJess Another so stupid they can't math. You can't divide across households then decide not to divide across passengers.

@fatfabfeminist Na, it's because you're just dumb enough to post based off headline and not read the story and see the lie.

@clarkegriffola Oh. It's way worse than that. The story took the time to average CO2 emissions from a household of 4 to compare.... But didn't average based on the people in the jet. It straight up lie.

Newegg Live! Humpday deals with Johnny, CeCe, Elly, and Ethan Woods.. Shop deals now! newegg.io/7e721ed x.com/i/broadcasts/1…