Dirk Gerhardt aka SilverSit @SitSilver

@VBruttel @benungeskriptet Multipolar hat heute auch Empfehlungen drauf.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@VBruttel @benungeskriptet Sehr gut, hab ich mir schon angehört. Und werde mir dir Screenshots nochmal genau anschauen. PS: x.com/DrLiMengYAN1/s…

Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1

32 minutes ago

This ODNI declassification involves the initial discussions surrounding the release of my First Yan Report on Sep 14, 2020 (x.com/DrLiMengYAN1/s…) What is shown here is only the tip of the iceberg. These emails expose part of the intense cognitive warfare conducted by the CCP

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

1 9 14 629 3

This ODNI declassification involves the initial discussions surrounding the release of my First Yan Report on Sep 14, 2020 (x.com/DrLiMengYAN1/s…) What is shown here is only the tip of the iceberg. These emails expose part of the intense cognitive warfare conducted by the CCP and forces aligned with Fauci to suppress global investigations into the truth of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the transnational persecution and suppression of whistleblowers. These revelations deserve careful examination. Key Points 1. On the very day I released the 1st Yan Report on the origin of COVID-19, DHS requested that the Intelligence Community analyze and discuss it. * However, someone within the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), without genuinely reviewing the contents, immediately characterized the report as “nonsense,” claiming that its conclusions were inconsistent with the “natural origin” narrative that had been promoted under Fauci’s leadership. * This raises a critical question: Was INR misled, or were certain individuals intentionally participating in efforts to suppress investigations into the origin of COVID-19? * More importantly, the email contains the following statement: “A couple virologists at State and I reviewed a version of her paper — it's been circulating for at least a month or so.” This statement is demonstrably false. * The report was uploaded and published on Zenodo at approximately 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on September 14, 2020. One month earlier, the report had not even been completed, and it had not been provided to anyone for review. How, then, could this individual have seen it “a month earlier”? 2. The following day, September 15, another effort was made to smear and discredit both me personally and the scientific evidence presented in my COVID-19 origin report by circulating a false narrative published in The Daily Beast. That article was based entirely on false narratives promoted by the CCP. * It was fully consistent with the large-scale disinformation campaigns later advanced by the CCP through outlets such as The New York Times, Guancha.cn, and many others, as well as with the CCP’s broader campaign of transnational persecution directed against me. * BTW, my first Twitter account—which had posted nothing except a link to the Yan Report—was permanently suspended on that very same day. The suspension shocked observers around the world. 3. Truth is eventually seen and verified. In the evening of Sep 14, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory requested that a group discussion (“circle up”) be organized to review the report. * The reason was straightforward: They considered portions of the scientific evidence presented in the report to be credible and worthy of further detailed examination. * They also proposed bringing personnel from Los Alamos National Laboratory into the discussion. 4. As additional members of the Intelligence Community carefully reviewed the report, a Sep 18 email showed that, based on the important illustration in the Yan Report describing the technical feasibility of laboratory synthesis of SARS-CoV-2, together with the report’s extensive chain of evidence built from hundreds of scientific references, analysts had already confirmed that the laboratory-origin pathway I described was technically feasible. * The email further noted that these methods were sufficiently mature that even undergraduate students could readily learn and apply them, and that the evidence pointed directly toward the Wuhan Institute of Virology. * This is particularly significant because Fauci and the CCP were aggressively insisting at the time that a laboratory origin was “technically impossible.” 5. It is important to remember that by following the technical pathway laid out in the Yan Reports, investigators can conclusively establish that the CCP’s military-civil fusion biological weapons system—represented by the Wuhan Institute of Virology—possessed the relevant capabilities, researchers, scientific publications, and research foundation necessary to conduct such work. The same evidence also exposes the false “scientific research” narratives regarding viral origins that were jointly promoted by the CCP and Fauci-associated interests. Furthermore, the evidence points directly and unequivocally to the coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21, originally discovered by the PLA in bat populations near Zhoushan in 2017, as the true templates of SARS-CoV-2. 6. As I keep telling the world, COVID-19 virus is an Unrestricted Bioweapon. Xi Jinping-CCP developed and released it intentionally and caused the historical disaster! Hold it accountable and prevent it in the future!

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard

14 hours ago

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements

13K 73K 233K 7.9M 33K

In his latest essay for @BiosafetyNow, “Forging facts by misquoting” virologist Simon Wain-Hobson describes the games played by unscrupulous scientists (e.g., Fauci, Collins, Andersen, Holmes, Garry, Morens, Daszak, + dozens of other virologists) when they try to transform unsupported claims such as COVID came from nature into "facts." biosafetynow.substack.com/p/forging-fact…

What caused the COVID-19 pandemic? I was recently invited by @tngtech to speak about the molecular and circumstantial evidence surrounding the origin of the pandemic at a fantastic conference (bigtechday.com). Watch the talk here: youtube.com/watch?v=YcdhIP… Thank you again for the invitation - and for having the courage to make room for a debate that could ensure our survival, but that almost no one else in Germany dares to host.

@stevenemassey @daniel_corcos The precursors are most likely itself result of serial passage experiments or other directed evolution methods, not only bats or pangolin viruses. Or more modern molecular biology methods like directed evolution or breeding catalogs maxygen.com/adventures

@stevenemassey @daniel_corcos And why has it two SAgs? Two LxxIxE-like motifs? An RGD integrin binding motif? Why has the FCS three other functions at least (NLS, CendR, Cardin-Weintraub-Motif)? Why has it 15+ receptor ways, some totally RBD ACE2 independent? (NTD, SA, Glycine zipper, TfR, AXL, HSPGs)?

Gabbard Drops Fauci Covid-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress zerohedge.com/covid-19/gabba…

@breakfast_dogs Then why it is still unknown to date? My latest understanding was, it can't be found anymore. Will relook.

@Macrobysunil China closed

@DNIGabbard 🧵15. Continued DECLASSIFIED BY DNI GABBARD ON 18 JUNE 2026 But I did a lot more research into this than they ever did You can read it for free: researchgate.net/publication/39… Yes, it is 40,000 words with 20 sections, but you will learn a lot, in fact much more than from @ODNIgov

@DNIGabbard 🧵13. Continued 6. The natural recombination of the S-genes of the bat & pangolin coronaviruses in pangolins is improbable 7. Based on conclusions 1-6, it is possible to assume the high probability of a lab producing the genetically changed version of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus

@club_gut "It was not about infecting humans as bioweapon, that's the paranoid view." Why has it 15+ human receptor ways then? You can call me paranoid all day long, doesn't change the facts that it is indeed a low level long time incapacitating bioweapon. Just look around. All sick.

Baric must have known. I can't comprehend how he shouldn't.

D. Janković (aka Dog's Breakfast) @breakfast_dogs

8 hours ago

I'm glad they did such a thorough analysis into the possibility of a bioweapon...🤔 What have we got then? The RBD doesn't look "perfect" according to "textbooks". It worked pretty well though, didn't it? 🤡 level analysis. Yeah sure, it was early days. Where's the follow up?

0 0 6 340 0

@TheSeeker268 Why did they comply? My hypothesis stands they have the bioweapon fact as leverage.

What I was saying is exactly the proposed idea in the IC report by Livmore labs, just released by Gabbard! @SwatiShindeTOI

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Monali C. Rahalkar @MonaRahalkar

a week ago

@atuntable Basically 4991 protein sequence is the backbone of Sars2. The S1 subunit, has been swapped with Pangolin CoV. Rest is all very similar. Then to show that they did not use it, they used the same protein sequence to create a different nucleotide sequence, named RaTG13.

4 4 16 844 2

@DNIGabbard Can we now discuss the many GOFROC DURC hints the SARS-CoV-2 virus has? Especially Spike-Protein and ORF8? Or is this still forbidden and off limits? Dr. Steven Quay made a start, with his new book 'The Code As A Witness', there are many more features inbuilt.

@paul_schreyer @quay_dr Glycine zippers, die Ladungen, ihre Form, Struktur und ermöglichte Flexibilität... Ich wundere mich, dass man das so lange vor uns verstecken konnte.

@paul_schreyer @quay_dr Die restlichen 'Inserts' ebenso. Je mehr ich dazu recherchiere, desto mehr Funktionsgewinne finde ich. Allein die Anzahl der Funktionen lässt nur Labor und nur DURC zu. Kein Vakzin Versuch, der irgendwie fehlgeschlagen ist. N-linked glycans, HSPGs, AXL, TfR Bindung, Gal-3 Faltung

Too little attention yet. @quay_dr presents his core analysis why SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab and has hints for dual use research, aka harmful codes aka bioweapon (even if this was not stated explicitely) "The Code As A Witness" youtube.com/live/alz26Z5-e…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next