Vince O'Neill @SailingGypsy

We are two days away from the Makerfield by-election, and the establishment media is incensed about Restore Britain. MPs in Reform, Labour, the Conservatives, and Liberal Democrats came together to condemn Rupert Lowe — proving he is the only man outside the Uniparty. The Daily Mail dedicated two front pages to smearing Restore Britain and its young supporters. They recycled slurs from Stand Up To Racism, and falsehoods retracted by Counterfire Magazine, to call Callum Barker, Angloid, and others attending the Remigration Summit as “neo-Nazis” and “white supremacists”. They sank as low as commissioning Boris Johnson’s cheerleader, Tory defector to Reform Nadine Dorries to write a hit piece on Rupert’s dead dog. Seems like they’re protecting their vested interests. The Mail intended to help Paul Marshall, owner of GB News and the Spectator, purchase the Telegraph via a UAE investment firm. Farage originally opposed the deal, until Marshall backed Reform, and the UAE government flew him out to Dubai last December. Nadhim Zahawi was brokering the deal between Redbird Capital and the Barclays family, and was rumoured to be the next Telegraph chairman. Zahawi defected to Reform in January, and was going to be their Foreign Affairs spokesman — until Reform realised their base hates him. Restore’s support in Makerfield has them worried. Labour’s polls put them on double digits. Restore’s canvassing returns have them as high as 24 per cent. Reform insist they’re on single figures, set to lose their deposit, but they aren’t acting like they believe that. Farage is getting asked about Rupert Lowe wherever he goes. They’ve spent all their slurs, and the party isn’t even six months old. Call them whatever you like: millions of people will still refuse to vote for recycled Tories. When every political party, the Daily Mail, Danny Finkelstein, the Sun, GB News, the Economist, the Guardian, and Hope Not Hate are all on the same side, attacking the same target, then you can be sure they’re the only ones who aren’t controlled opposition. Rupert, in interviews with the Times and the Telegraph, refused to disavow anyone. He has responded to these smears with his characteristic “I don’t care,” replying, “If you define common sense as far-Right, I’m happy to be called far-Right. I’m not going to be put down by some woke creeps telling us we’re racist.” The cordon sanitaire has failed. Containment has been breached. And whether Restore comes second, third, or first in Makerfield, everyone else is fighting elections on their terms going forward.

Jeremy et al, you and the TALK organisation have been doing quite well in reflecting the views of "the person in the street" to date, but today you strayed quite significantly from that course. You rightly pillory BBC news, Sky News and the other tame news(?) organisations for their naked bias in reporting. Today TALK TV has fallen to the same level! Richard Tice was wise enough not to rise to your bait, I sincerely hope you all return to the brand; "The Home of Common Sense"? Sincerely, Vince O'Neill

Talk @TalkTV

4 days ago

“Restore is a very dodgy party.” Brendan O’Neill, Chief Political Writer at Spiked Online, speaks to Jeremy about his visit to Makerfield this weekend. @jkyleofficial

514 179 532 178K 69

Powerful analysis!

Western Civilization didn't flourish because "white males" stopped other groups from succeeding. The West thrived because of rational thought, individual rights, and free enterprise. "White males" that invented the steam engine, electric generation, the combustion engine, flight, and space exploration did not do so because they "stole" the ideas of minorities. These inventions helped lift mankind out of ignorance and hardship, improving the quality of life for all of humanity. "White males" didn't oppress the entire world, they helped make it a better place. "White males" didn't oppress everyone's rights, they invented the idea of rights and paid in blood to liberate tens of millions of people. "White males" didn't invent slavery, they ended it. "White males" didn't invent tyranny, they devised a form of government to end it. Destroying Western Civilization isn't about empowering groups that were "oppressed." It is about tearing down civilization itself so that globalist parasites can rule over all of us.

Nancy C @NC7983

4 weeks ago

@robertsepehr @Greene_Thoughts @BreitbartNews Why isn’t dismantling white male focused societal conventions not a good deal? Why isn’t giving groups, such as women and no -whites more opportunities to maximize their potential. Why is aiming for diversity in groups making decisions bad, as they clearly come up with better2)

878 28 98 1.5M 80

voxpopulimedia.com/post/we-need-t…

The Man Nobody Is Talking About. His Name Is Sir Philip Barton. Buried inside Tuesday's committee testimony, beneath the headlines about constant pressure, bullying and secret job searches, is the detail that may prove the most consequential of this entire affair. It concerns not Olly Robbins, not Morgan McSweeney, not even Keir Starmer. It concerns the man who was there before all of them. The man who said no. The man who then left his post eight months early. Sir Philip Barton was the Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office when Peter Mandelson's appointment was announced in December 2024. He was, in other words, the most senior civil servant in the building at the precise moment the machinery of state was being directed to place a man with documented links to Russia and China into the most sensitive diplomatic posting in the Western alliance. What Robbins told the committee on Tuesday is this. Barton pushed back. When the Cabinet Office argued that vetting Mandelson was unnecessary, that a peer and Privy Councillor did not require developed vetting, Barton refused to accept it. He insisted that vetting was a requirement. He had to be, in Robbins's own words, very firm in person. He also voiced reservations about the appointment to Jonathan Powell, the National Security Adviser, reservations that were noted and not acted upon. He was worried, Robbins suggested, about exactly the same reputational risks that had been detailed to the Prime Minister before the appointment was announced. Then Sir Philip Barton left his post. Eight months before his tenure would otherwise have concluded. The question Richard Foord put to Robbins on Tuesday was the right one. Why did Barton's tenure end early? Robbins said he did not know. He suggested ministers may have felt it was time for a change. That answer is not an answer. It is the absence of one. Consider what the timeline now shows. A senior civil servant pushes back against the appointment, insists on vetting when the Cabinet Office wants to bypass it, raises reservations with the National Security Adviser, and departs eight months ahead of schedule. His replacement arrives to find the appointment already treated as a fait accompli, the vetting process under constant pressure from Downing Street, and the question of outcome entirely subordinate to the question of speed. If Barton was removed because he stood in the way of this appointment, then Robbins was not the first civil servant sacrificed to protect it. He was the second. And the question of who else was moved aside, overruled or silenced in the months between December 2024 and the moment the security services finally said no, becomes the most important question this affair has yet produced. Starmer sacked Robbins for following the rules. The Foreign Affairs Committee will now call Barton to give evidence. What he says will either confirm what the timeline already suggests or provide an alternative explanation that the evidence does not currently support. There is a pattern here that goes beyond process failure. Process failures are random. They point in different directions. What this affair has produced is a series of events that point consistently in one direction. Officials who comply are retained. Officials who push back depart. The security services are bypassed. The vetting is treated as an administrative inconvenience. And the one question nobody at the top of this government will answer is why this appointment, this man, this post, mattered so much that every obstacle was removed to make it happen. Barton apparently asked that question. He left eight months early. The country deserves to know why.

Feel better now?

Shafiq Ahmed @Shafiq_Ahmed

4 months ago

@MissJilianne Or the bottom, where he is at.

0 0 0 63 0

I have never known a more deceitful and unpopular government. They are driving forward massive changes with no mandate such as ending trial by jury. Surely the time is fast approaching when our King must step forward on behalf of his people and dissolve this rotten parliament.

I would strongly contest “more importantly”? Despite being perfect assessments they are surely arse about face?

Mark Wallace @wallaceme

7 months ago

Good on @KarlTurnerMP

1 0 9 3K 0

Open Letter to MP Iqbal Mohamed, I recently watched your video where you stated: “Let the West… let the enemies not divide us.” Since you are a sitting Member of the British Parliament, this raises some serious questions that demand clarification: 1. If the West is your “enemy,” then what exactly are you doing representing a British constituency in the UK Parliament – which sits in the heart of the West, in London? You cannot call the very nation you serve an enemy while holding public office within it. 2. Do you genuinely feel safe living among these “enemies” in the UK? If you truly believe this country and its people are hostile, then standing for political office here contradicts your own statement. 3. Are you stepping back from the oath you took – in the name of Allah – to bear true faith and allegiance to His Majesty King Charles and to uphold the laws and values of the United Kingdom? Your words appear fundamentally at odds with the responsibilities and loyalty required of a British MP. 4. How do you justify using taxpayer-funded British institutions, resources, and a parliamentary salary while simultaneously portraying the West as an enemy? It raises questions about integrity and the proper use of public office. 5. When you say “the West,” are you including your own voters in Dewsbury & Batley – the people who trusted you with their mandate? Do you also view them as part of this so-called enemy? 6. Is it appropriate for an MP to label the UK or “the West” as an enemy when this rhetoric risks increasing hostility and creating fear within communities? 7. Will you publicly clarify whether your allegiance lies with the British Constitution and your oath of office, or with overseas political movements that contradict your commitments as a UK MP? Finally, Do you consider yourself a British representative in Pakistan-linked events or a Pakistan representative inside the British Parliament? @TiceRichard @Nigel_Farage @reformparty_uk @ReformDaily_ @ZiaYusufUK #MPIqbalMohamed #West #ReformUK

Kaptain Bertorelli?

Benonwine @benonwine

8 months ago

What comes to MIND when you see this image?

75 4 14 6K 0

We need to use all means to oppose #nodigitalid and the Together site focuses on asking politicians for salvation. But to actually resist this now, go to the "Resist Guide," provided by Fiona Rose Diamond, who put in the hard work to organise the march. massnoncompliance.com/resist-guide

Alan D Miller @alanvibe

8 months ago

Live Now protest #NoToDigitalID Stand #together everyone & say no to forcing directors veterans kids & all togetherdeclaration.org/campaigns/dont…

84 779 3K 110K 50

What is the significance of the increasingly obvious ‘wearing of light blue’ uniform?

Mike Graham 🇬🇧 @Iromg

9 months ago

What’s wrong with the police? 🇬🇧

846 2K 8K 190K 69

@leeharris Why apologise? It’s a statement of fact?

@UKinCaribbean Not in my name!

@labourlewis Blimey! I find myself in broad agreement with Clive Lewis MP? A ray of hope in a crazy world!

Instead, ‘could’ should read ‘will’? Mean what you’re saying!!!!!!

Talk @TalkTV

9 months ago

BREAKING: The UK could suspend visas from countries that do not “play ball” and agree to returns deals for migrants, new Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said.

412 62 439 39K 7