Strange Time Revue @STRevue

Cultural & political commentary | 'The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.' – Solzhenitsyn | https://t.co/YtLYRiqmv3 Joined August 2023

Tweets

2K
Followers

273
Following

1K
Likes

2K

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

4 hours ago

@DavidBe31099196 How long is too long?

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

3 weeks ago

@robkhenderson @PadovaGozzi The women are wonderful effect.

0 0 2 143 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

3 weeks ago

@GenAcc69 @PadovaGozzi @Fiery_Blue750 @MisandryE @V7nceVolt @CrazyCa0918 @OneIsWorse @Surviving_LADa @AeroAerial @back_acha665 @blubber_bones @yamato46_ @SandorActual @ChiocciMike @toweypat @MikaelS_TheMan @JeffChrist94151 @Chengiz1000 @ManuelMCruz2 @xStrat9x Is this real?

1 0 0 186 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

3 weeks ago

@EricLDaugh That man is a hero. @TheTinMenBlog

0 0 1 11 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

3 weeks ago

@TheTinMenBlog They also seem to be framing equality as having more women than men in these roles..

1 15 415 6K 6

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@avidseries @UN_Women post like they're a stroppy teenager.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

@TheTinMenBlog I was thinking about this in terms of the aesthetic as well. It does seem very deliberate and dare I say contrived to give that "ordinary man of the people" feel. It annoys me as well because it feels manipulative and dishonest. Very common on the left though, sadly.

1 0 12 844 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

Perhaps so in certain cases, but that's only part of the puzzle. E.g. Imagine they get good GCSEs, do A Levels, have to work simultaneously since they have no money, get into a university but can't afford to support themselves etc. There are many potential pitfalls and barriers and it doesn't take much to push people in precarious situations off course. Even if they get a degree, who's to say they didn't get sold a nonsense course and now they're in a ton of student debt.

0 0 0 13 0

View Details

Grok @grok

a month ago

Stripping out maternity (~£4bn annually pre-2025 per NHS 2021/22 data for obstetric/midwifery services), purely women-only clinical spending on gynaecological conditions, endometriosis, fibroids, and ovarian/cervical cancers still exceeded male-only equivalents like prostate/testicular cancers (combined ~£400m range per Prostate Cancer UK and NHS reports). Gynaecology volumes for benign issues drove the tilt. The new men's strategy addresses broader male mortality gaps without erasing prior disparities. Data prioritizes outcomes.

0 1 0 45 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@grok @sharrond62 @grok if you strip out maternity funding how does that change the amount of funding per sex?

1 0 0 23 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

As per @grok - "historically, before 2025, issues affecting only women received substantially more UK healthcare funding than those affecting only men." But lets not focus on that eh @sharrond62 . x.com/i/status/20485…

Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62

a month ago

Men’s health gets 60% bigger funding boost than women’s 😡 thetimes.com/article/3f4221…

13 18 115 7K 5

1 0 0 74 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@grok @grok please reply

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@grok You decided to highlight the research part because it would frame women as victims, which is incredibly gynocentric.

1 0 1 12 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@Grok does seem to veer off onto gynocentric tangents sometimes, but then again its probably trained on that type of data.

Grok @grok

a month ago

@STRevue @sharrond62 Fair point on the framing. Your original ask was about pre-2025 healthcare funding for purely sex-specific conditions (not research). Clinical data shows maternity services alone ran into billions annually for women-only care, outpacing male-only equivalents like

1 0 0 49 0

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@grok @sharrond62 I never asked you specifically about research funding. You did that on your own.

1 0 0 20 0

View Details

Strange Time Revue @STRevue

a month ago

@grok @sharrond62 You've got confused. I mentioned healthcare funding for issues that just affect women vs those that just affect men pre-2025. x.com/i/status/20485…

Grok @grok

a month ago

@STRevue @sharrond62 **Historically, before 2025, issues affecting only women received substantially more UK healthcare funding than those affecting only men.** Female-only conditions (maternity care, gynaecological issues, breast/ovarian/cervical cancers, endometriosis) had major NHS clinical