RonMan @RonManX

Bitcoin | Outdoors | Podcast Junkie | Travel United States Joined January 2011

Tweets

20K
Followers

3K
Following

2K
Likes

47K

RonMan @RonManX

9 hours ago

@bankertobuilder You’d rather sit at a 4 way stop sign while the car in front of you can’t decide who is next.

0 0 0 16 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

9 hours ago

@NotSoEasyMoney Long on that timeframe

0 0 1 107 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

13 hours ago

@sunnydecree Hope the guy had good insurance hauling with that SUV.

0 0 2 239 0

View Details

You picked correctly and bought a stock last year that’s now up 150%. What do you do next? A. Sell it all and move the money into an index fund. B. Sell 1/3 or 1/2, recover your original capital, and let the rest ride. C. Hold every share because the reasons you bought it are still intact. Most investors spend all their time deciding what to buy. The harder question is deciding what to do when you’re right. In my experience, big winners are responsible for most portfolio returns. Selling too early can be just as costly as holding too long. The answer depends on one thing: Has the thesis changed, or just the price? What would you do?

0 0 1 36 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

14 hours ago

@SpeculatorArt He has his priorities straight! Have fun.

0 0 2 9 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

14 hours ago

@MarketPalmer_ Gladly if they will stop harvesting my data.

0 0 1 37 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

14 hours ago

@NotSoEasyMoney I’ll be long around $100

0 0 0 178 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

14 hours ago

@dotkrueger We have so many charts.

0 0 0 49 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

15 hours ago

@APompliano This is an education issue more than anything.

0 0 2 28 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

15 hours ago

It starts with education just like everything in life. Currently, we teach children how to spend money, not how to invest it. They learn how to use credit cards, finance cars, and consume products. Very few learn about compound interest, owning assets, or how businesses create wealth. A society that teaches consumption will create consumers. A society that teaches investing will create investors.

Anthony Pompliano 🌪 @APompliano

16 hours ago

Hard truth of modern society: It is hard for investors to complain about the destruction of the US dollar or the rise of the K-shaped economy when the root cause is also enriching them.

63 16 283 45K 13

0 0 0 36 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

18 hours ago

@cmsinvests Nah not smart. Go find a side hustle if you think $4k makes that big a difference.

0 0 1 338 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

18 hours ago

@cryptomanran What storm?

0 0 2 26 0

View Details

@

21 hours ago

$STRC has a self-repairing mechanism that most people don’t really understand. 🛠️ Below par, Strategy stops issuing new shares via ATM. No new capital is raised at a discount, and no new perpetual dividend obligations are added to the balance sheet. This is the case at both $99.99 or $90. The self-repairing mechanism then activates automatically - the farther below par, the more powerful it becomes. Here’s how it works 👇 1⃣ Effective yield increases (higher % return on the same cash dividend). The 11.5% dividend is not paid on the market price of STRC. The dividend is paid on the par value of $100. Think of each unit of STRC as $100 but you can buy it for less sometimes, depending on market conditions. If you buy one share of STRC for $90, the effective yield is 12.78%. 2⃣ Pull-to-par capital gain incentives activate. Strong buy pressure emerges from investors who want the combination of elevated effective yield + capital gains as price moves back toward $100. The higher effective yield feeds the pull-to-par dynamic, which is further supported by the Bitcoin balance sheet continuing to strengthen. Buyers at a discount capture the recovery to par as capital gains. The system self-corrects without anyone having to “defend” a peg (and again for the people in the back, there is no peg because it's not a stablecoin). STRC and similar instruments (such as SATA) rely on free-market incentives and long-term Bitcoin growth to restore equilibrium. If liquidation events (like we saw last week) push STRC below par, it simply trades below par. STRC below par does not negatively affect the dividends; it only affects short-term capital that wants to exit immediately. If STRC required active defense, that would actually be a weakness. Structures that cannot bend under stress will break. Now let's run some numbers to get an idea of the actual incentives for the market. As STRC is a perpetual, we'll go with a one-year time frame for recovery to par. And let's use the $90 IPO price. Effective yield (what you actually earn in dividends relative to your $90 cost): 11.50/90 = 12.78% Pull-to-par capital gain: (100-90)/90 = 11.11% Total return on your $90 investment: (11.5 + 10)/90 = 23.89% *Note this is a simple sum approximation. As dividends are paid semi-monthly throughout the year, the actual realized return is slightly higher if you factor in the timing of cash flows. So this ~24% one-year total return profile (yield + cap gains) is exactly what makes buying below par attractive for total-return investors. It turns a temporary discount into a high single-year payoff (or shorter) while the self-repairing mechanism does its work. To reiterate what I said previously, there's nothing for @saylor and @Strategy to do here. No need to raise the coupon, no need to increase the cash buffer, or anything else. They could do those things of course, but it’s not a necessity. STRC is working perfectly as designed.

15 128 979 62K 215

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

19 hours ago

@WallStreetApes @grok give some examples of how this will impact working class people in California. Give some examples of services that will now be taxed.

1 0 1 769 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

a day ago

@grok @RoKhanna Could the money be used in the US to save lives? Maybe reduce veteran suicide or treat addiction. Any studies on that?

1 0 0 8 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

a day ago

@mikebelshe The problem of to many high net worth individuals in California.

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

RonMan @RonManX

a day ago

@grok what are the facts around the claims that Khanna is making?

Marco Foster @MarcoFoster_

2 days ago

Ro Khanna: “There needs to be accountability for Elon Musk. They’re celebrating that he created 4,400 millionaires, but they don’t talk about the 4.5M children around the world who he possibly sentenced to death by dismantling USAID. He needs to answer for that. He needs to be