Phlexx @Realphlexx

@akintollgate Are they trying enough to deserve second term ? Or they are doing damage control of what their administration destroyed?

@WeirdMedieval Everything doesn’t need old context to it Chill n enjoy a cold beer with men like you

@oku_yungx 3-1

@john322226 4-1

The craziest compilation video of men rage baiting their women you will ever see 😬🤣

@UnkleAyo 2-2

@EndWokeness You have to support your country first then if your country doesn’t qualify then you can support other team of your choice. Having people who don’t see themselves as Americans even while living there for years and running for offices is funny to me

@Cristiano @selecaoportugal Goat 🐐

@israel_ajoje Na mad man 😂😂

@matzeraxx Damn 😭😭 9pele tail

@cornetadoffc As how na 😭 I thought we are savage this guys are worse 😭🤣

@OTPipers @talk_sport Una funny with this fake rumor 😂

@olajiire101 @abazwhyllzz As how na 😂😂

Pls don’t forget your clutch foot after World Cup 😭 We need the complete amad🫡

SuperSport Football ⚽️ @SSFootball

5 days ago

Amad Diallo is Côte d'Ivoire's 𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐄𝐑 𝐒𝐔𝐁 🐘⚡ The Ivorians end their 12-year wait for a #FIFAWorldCup win 👏 #SSFootball | #DStvFIFAWorldCup2026

36 537 5K 180K 106

The referee fouled a player 😂😂 #Nedvsjap

@crazeclown You just want make them drag u cause this your tweet no make any sense

How a religion reasons is a huge theological confession in and of itself. Christian reasoning from its foundations is meticulous, internally consistent, and built on shared text. When the writer of Hebrews wants to argue for the divinity and priestly rank of Christ to wavering Jewish believers, he does not merely assert. He builds. He says: Remember Melchizedek? No genealogy, no traceable ancestry. Yet Abraham paid him tithes. In Hebrew culture, the lesser pays the greater. You have already agreed, without knowing you agreed, that there was a figure who outranked your patriarch. Then he drops Psalm 110: "The Lord has sworn... you are a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek." If Melchizedek is greater than Abraham, and the Messiah belongs to Melchizedek’s rank, the Messiah does not share a category with the prophets. He sits above the one your fathers bowed to. That is an argument with no exit. You have to dismantle the text or accept the conclusion. Now contrast that with this example or series of examples you Muslims always point to. Anytime you want to justify bowing five times a day facing a specific geographic location, you drag in Biblical prophets completely at random. You see Jesus, in a moment of agonizing trepidation in Matthew 26, fall on his face to pray, and you instantly leap to: “Therefore he prayed like a Muslim.” Do you think through the logic of this? In 2 Samuel, King David "danced before the Lord with all his might." By your exact methodology, should we start a new religion centered around dancing hysterically before God? God is a Father. Sometimes his children approach him with dancing; sometimes, scared and broken, we lie flat; sometimes we sit. There is no chain of textual consequence in your argument. There is only a posture and a verdict. It looks like logic until you actually look inside it. But since you opened the New Testament, for Jesus let us actually look at how Jesus handles prayer. He completely shifts the frame from the external to the internal. He tells his disciples: Go into your room, close the door, and pray to your Father who is unseen. He tells the Samaritan woman that a time is coming when worship will not be tied to a mountain or to Jerusalem, because “God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.” He does not mention any geographic requirement or rigid ritual performance. It is an intimate, genuine encounter with a personal God. And if you want to use Jesus's prayers to define him, you cannot stop at the garden. Look at John 17:5. Jesus prays: "Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began." Find me the prophet who prayed that. Abraham never did. Moses never did. No mere prophet in history ever walked into prayer and claimed pre-creational, shared glory with the Almighty. The posture of submission in Matthew 26 doesn't undermine Christian theology; it requires it. It proves the Incarnation, the eternal Son genuinely entering human dependence and feeling the weight of human fear. You stopped reading at the physical posture, missed the entire theological foundation, and as usual you think this is a good refutation.

Cool_Ustaaz ☪ @Cool_Ustaz

6 days ago

Muslims worship God the same way all the prophets in the Quran and the Bible worshipped God, while Christians have invented their own new religion.

155 54 254 226K 20

Women just want the ability to complain about what you’re not doing so imagine you are doing everything needed. She’s feels powerless

STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand

a week ago

I have read so many men’s divorce stories on Reddit, and he is 100% right. These men claim they cooked, cleaned, changed diapers, paid the bills, and showed up to their kids’ games and appointments, yet their wives still divorced them. Why? Many men don’t understand that what

43 293 2K 265K 1K

This plea is not merely heartbreaking. It is theologically indicting. Every religion that elevates a historical figure invites an obvious objection: you have imported the limitations of his century along with his wisdom. Christianity is not immune to this on its surface. But the question is not which century your prophet came from. The question is whether the man you elevated transcended his century or merely inhabited it. Jesus touched lepers in a world that quarantined them. He held public theology with women when the rabbinical tradition refused them. He stood inside Roman imperial power and refused every offer of it. He told his disciples that greatness looked like a servant and that the meek, not the militarily dominant, would inherit the earth. He did not import 1st century Rome. He confronted it at every structural point. Muhammad worked within the gender architecture of 7th century Arabia. He occasionally softened it. He did not dismantle it, he codified it. Surah 33:59 does not emerge from divine aesthetics. It emerges from a situation where his men were harassing women in Medina’s streets, and the solution offered was not to discipline the men but to mark the women. Distinguish your wives so we know which ones we can abuse. That is the textual sociology behind the hijab. You can argue across fourteen centuries about jurisprudence and interpretation but you cannot erase the situation that produced the verse. When a founding figure does not confront the power structures of his world but works within them, those power structures become sacred. The 7th century gender architecture does not stay in the 7th century. It travels forward dressed as revelation. This is why the Taliban are not an aberration. They are the answer to a sincere question: what does serious, uncompromising application of the external enforcement paradigm look like when you remove the moderating pressure of Western political shame? Afghanistan is the answer. Those men are not distorting Islam. They are implementing it without apology. Christianity is structurally different. Not because Christians are morally superior but because the architecture is different by design. The compliance mechanism is inward. The law written on the heart, not enforced at the school gate. This means God chose that the most devout believer and the most flagrant sinner face each other in the same invisible courtroom, and He alone presides. He gave us the mandate to preach and persuade. He did not give us the authority to coerce. When men try to, they are not being more Christian. They are being less. The architecture resists them. Islam’s architecture does not resist them. It licenses them. And men who want power will always find a religion that licenses them and call it devotion. So that girl’s cry is a theodicy in one sentence. She is right. Whatever god demands this cannot be the creator of women. The left refuses this conversation because it forces a choice between feminist commitments and the reflexive defence of Islamic exceptionalism. They will choose the latter, dress it in the language of anti-colonialism, and leave Afghan girls crying in the dark.

Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf

a week ago

An Afghan girl cries: “I wish God had never created women. Even animals can roam freely, but we are forbidden from stepping outside the house.” The Taliban has permanently banned women from attending schools and legalized (sexual) slavery. Zero protests by leftists or Muslims.

676 10K 26K 309K 1K

@OgbeniDipo Lol