雷琪如 @RaykiruS

The lost Beyond Joined July 2022

Tweets

6K
Followers

65
Following

49
Likes

338K

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

7 hours ago

@PKPatchworks Love seeing natural selection in process.

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

19 hours ago

@Silver_Ryugami They are Epstein's disciples through and through

0 0 7 683 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

20 hours ago

@michelee226 @Yugison1 @GameRobyn I assume most of the cost isn't the key but the service of installing itself. Which is also absurd since it's literally idiot proof by design

0 0 2 305 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

20 hours ago

@Yugison1 @GameRobyn Why the hell would you pay for windows key when even Microsoft doesn't give a shit about Windows Activation software being hosted on their platform(GitHub)

1 0 33 3K 4

View Details

Ryan Fleury @rfleury

2 days ago

@X Hover animations should never feel so sluggish, and it provides no useful information to the user to blend the position of hover visualizations from an unrelated button in a list

10 10 238 7K 24

View Details

@GiantMimighoul1 Also, a portion of the crashout is because some people decided for themselves that the theme of the deck is "that it doesn't touch the deck" and this card does that. Absolute buffoons

1 0 9 176 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@hailthebluemoon @cpf_taxed @theo Wont do, people are too attached to what they think the words mean rather their etymology. Some people will freak out if they see a word containing "ped/pedo" or "phile" and immediately make the association with the combination of these 2 even though the roots themselves are fine

0 0 0 24 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@rfleury @etscrivner True, I use whether someone specifically hates jblow as a filter. I had this lab assistant at uni that disliked him and, as you would expect, bro was a webslop enjoyer.

0 0 0 30 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@__sb______ A potential so high

0 0 4 3K 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@BIGGOISBIGGO If kuro wills it

0 0 0 138 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@BIGGOISBIGGO >"but she will make 0 sales,anon" >0 sales +1

0 0 2 463 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@GiveMeBanHammer You mean, "What I *potentially* do to Lurkers fr."

0 0 0 130 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@ptrschmdtnlsn How peculiar. Anyways, I randomly stumbled upon this totally unrelated article gingerbill.org/article/2025/0…

0 0 0 413 1

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@NerdFactorYGO >Misinterprets the gimmick/theme of the deck >Gets mad when a card is printed that doesn't follow the misinterpreted gimmick You're doing the same thing as people who complain about the translated Vs official name of archetypes: you think you know better then konami.

0 0 8 302 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@MBTYuGiOh The easiest fix to implement (logistically) would be to slowly change the design philosophy of archetypes: introduce more turn 0 interactions and cards that are buffed going second(and not cards that are only good 2nd).

0 0 0 79 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@LavenderMacar0n @MBTYuGiOh 3. For this to work, they would need to first ban out all the 1-card combo decks or somehow make the new 2 cc decks stronger then the current ones. This change is possible in principle but can only happen very slowly

0 0 4 92 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@LavenderMacar0n @MBTYuGiOh 2. Just limit? Some definitely need to be banned. Once you limit a certain set of cards, there will still remain cards that might be considered "too powerful in the current format". Again, very format sensitive.

0 0 3 87 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@LavenderMacar0n @MBTYuGiOh You're a pretty bad game designer if you propose this... 1. Which cards exactly lead to unfair game states? This is highly sensitive to the current meta and available tools. A normal summon with 2100 attack could be considered unfair if there's no way to deal with it.

1 0 4 76 0

View Details

雷琪如 @RaykiruS

2 days ago

@karl_zylinski Reading through the article, I'm a bit confused. Why exactly do you want for the returned value to be always 0 when an error occurs? For me,whether I get an error,I always ignore the returned value. Theoretically,you could also use a partially complete value along with the error