Thoughts? How do you see this being used? Will it be used as designed? Will it do what it's designed for? What are your first impressions?
Thoughts? How do you see this being used? Will it be used as designed? Will it do what it's designed for? What are your first impressions?
@PeterWrangel My concern is the doctrine itself. Combat jump to secure enemy airfield. Then, land in C-17 to deploy. OK. Who are going to fight requiring forcible entry ops? I can name a few and I don't like it.
@PeterWrangel With what we see in Ukraine with drones.. heavy armor is obsolete.
@PeterWrangel Looks like a BR 8.3 in my opinion, so not great.
@PeterWrangel Is this an MBT or designed as a lighter variant? Name doesn't ring any bells for recent contract/production discussions.
@PeterWrangel Seems like the Army's version of the Littoral Combat Ship.
@PeterWrangel Neither fish nor foul, likely a costly mistake.
@PeterWrangel If equipped with an APS, like Trophy, it will be ok. Precision direct fire support, not going toe to toe with MBTs.