Patrick J Soule Music @PJSMusic
I've run a successful business, been a soldier, firefighter, commercial driver, worked construction, armed security, property management, ride share... retired Phoenix, AZ Joined February 2026-
Tweets735
-
Followers166
-
Following717
-
Likes249
Ask the store for it's purchase/pricing policy. If they refuse give it to you, contact corporate and ask for a copy of the purchase/pricin6 policy. Specifically mention the one c e n t policy because you aren't lowering the price, the store and/or corporate is lowering the price. If you ask an employee to get an item down and they do it and the store also offers ladders for customers to use to get products down from a higher area, it's on them for setting the prices. It's on them for putting it in a customer accessible area or retrieving the item for the customer. Everyone else, employees included, at the store can just shut the f****** up.
If you start punching criminals in the face, continuously, until they comply, does that make it wrong? Asking for a friend. I'm just sayin'...
🔥 Is This Electioneering?? Poll worker denies a voter a ballot for wearing a MAGA hat. Electioneering rules vary by state; some strictly prohibit candidate gear inside polling places, while others are more lenient on slogans like ‘MAGA’. ✨Always check your local laws before
So I'm watching this video and when she says "that's why the Democrats are losing, because we always play by the rules", a spontaneous utterance erupted from my mouth... "Lying ***ck" burst fourth without me even thinking about it. I am appalled that anyone like that is in a position of quote Authority unquote representing the people of America, or at least allegedly that person's District! Oh My Gosh!!
It doesn't matter what country you're in, government wants to control you and in that attempt to control you, will lie through its ass and interpret a plainly written statute and or law, and we're not going to get into that discussion in this instance, to try and achieve whatever result it wants. Unfortunately, currently you have to play their game and know their game better than they do. Which can be difficult, because they will keep changing the rules and not tell anybody that the rules have been changed. So your rule needs to become, I am going to continuously pay attention to any and all rule changes that may or may not affect me, because the government will try to use them against me.
All she needed to do is drive on by, and yet she made herself central to the story by injecting her into something that she didn't need to inject herself into. I'm betting pregnancy hormones and not having a man to even her out. Don't be mad at me, I didn't make humans and the need for men and women to even each other out, blame it on God, if you have to blame someone, but I wouldn't go that route if I were you.
So first let me say this about that. I don't believe this guy had good intentions regarding the judge's order. In fact, I think he wanted to do what he wanted to do regardless of what the court said. But what I think, what the judge thinks, and what the prosecutor thinks are completely irrelevant. The Constitution was written specifically to prevent government from depriving someone of liberty based on what government officials think. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process of law. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused the right to face his accusers, to obtain counsel, and to be judged in an impartial proceeding. Now let's look at what actually happened. A judge issues an order. The judge decides the order was violated. The judge determines whether the explanation is sufficient. The judge determines whether guilt exists. The judge determines whether punishment is appropriate. The judge determines the punishment. The judge then sends the man to jail. That is not due process. That is one person acting as offended party, accuser, fact finder, prosecutor, judge, jury, and sentencer all at the same time. The Founders did not write the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because they trusted government officials. They wrote them because they did not. The question is not whether the guy is a jerk. The question is not whether the guy deserved punishment. The question is whether government can deprive a citizen of liberty without the constitutional protections that exist specifically to prevent abuses of power. In my view, the answer is no. If a judge believes a citizen violated an order and should be incarcerated, then the constitutional process is straightforward. The accusation is presented. A grand jury may consider the matter if required. The accused is notified. The accused is given the opportunity to retain counsel or have counsel appointed. The accused is allowed to confront witnesses. Evidence is presented. The State proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt. An impartial jury determines guilt. A different judge imposes sentence if a conviction occurs. What cannot happen under a strict reading of the Constitution is one government official deciding that he has been disobeyed and then personally ordering a citizen into a jail cell. The government does not possess powers simply because they are convenient. Government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The burden is not on the citizen to prove the government lacks authority. The burden is on the government to identify where that authority was granted. Show me where the Constitution authorizes a judge to bypass the protections of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and imprison a citizen based solely upon the judge's own finding. Not where another judge said it was okay. Not where a court created a doctrine. Not where modern jurisprudence evolved into something convenient. Show me where the Constitution itself grants that authority. If liberty can be taken without due process, then due process means nothing. If a judge can be the accuser and the adjudicator, then impartiality means nothing. If incarceration can occur without the protections guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, then those amendments are reduced to suggestions rather than restraints on government power. Yes, I realize that is not how current jurisprudence operates. I also believe current jurisprudence has drifted far from the constitutional restraints the Founders intentionally imposed. The Constitution is not supposed to bend itself around government convenience. Government is supposed to bend itself around the Constitution. Am I tilting at windmills? Probably. But every major abuse of power in history survived because enough people convinced themselves it was normal. If enough of us keep tilting at windmills, maybe we'll knock the f**kers off their pedestals!
So first let me say this about that. I don't believe this guy had good intentions regarding the judge's order. In fact, I think he wanted to do what he wanted to do regardless of what the court said. But what I think, what the judge thinks, and what the prosecutor thinks are completely irrelevant. The Constitution was written specifically to prevent government from depriving someone of liberty based on what government officials think. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process of law. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the accused the right to face his accusers, to obtain counsel, and to be judged in an impartial proceeding. Now let's look at what actually happened. A judge issues an order. The judge decides the order was violated. The judge determines whether the explanation is sufficient. The judge determines whether guilt exists. The judge determines whether punishment is appropriate. The judge determines the punishment. The judge then sends the man to jail. That is not due process. That is one person acting as offended party, accuser, fact finder, prosecutor, judge, jury, and sentencer all at the same time. The Founders did not write the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because they trusted government officials. They wrote them because they did not. The question is not whether the guy is a jerk. The question is not whether the guy deserved punishment. The question is whether government can deprive a citizen of liberty without the constitutional protections that exist specifically to prevent abuses of power. In my view, the answer is no. If a judge believes a citizen violated an order and should be incarcerated, then the constitutional process is straightforward. The accusation is presented. A grand jury may consider the matter if required. The accused is notified. The accused is given the opportunity to retain counsel or have counsel appointed. The accused is allowed to confront witnesses. Evidence is presented. The State proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt. An impartial jury determines guilt. A different judge imposes sentence if a conviction occurs. What cannot happen under a strict reading of the Constitution is one government official deciding that he has been disobeyed and then personally ordering a citizen into a jail cell. The government does not possess powers simply because they are convenient. Government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The burden is not on the citizen to prove the government lacks authority. The burden is on the government to identify where that authority was granted. Show me where the Constitution authorizes a judge to bypass the protections of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and imprison a citizen based solely upon the judge's own finding. Not where another judge said it was okay. Not where a court created a doctrine. Not where modern jurisprudence evolved into something convenient. Show me where the Constitution itself grants that authority. If liberty can be taken without due process, then due process means nothing. If a judge can be the accuser and the adjudicator, then impartiality means nothing. If incarceration can occur without the protections guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, then those amendments are reduced to suggestions rather than restraints on government power. Yes, I realize that is not how current jurisprudence operates. I also believe current jurisprudence has drifted far from the constitutional restraints the Founders intentionally imposed. The Constitution is not supposed to bend itself around government convenience. Government is supposed to bend itself around the Constitution. Am I tilting at windmills? Probably. But every major abuse of power in history survived because enough people convinced themselves it was normal. If enough of us keep tilting at windmills, maybe we'll knock the f**kers off their pedestals!
Judge Rejects Host's AIRBNB Loophole, Imposes 90 Days Jail!
That, and I'm not going to use the word that comes to mind, congress person, has a demonstrated bias against the president and is apparently intentionally misrepresenting the videos. I see a person with their eyes closed, but I've never seen someone fall asleep with their head turned when sitting. It always returns to a neutral position. Not saying it can't happen, but it's not what I'm seeing. Being as this congress person has an intentional, shown, and demonstrated bias against the President, he'll use anything to attempt to cause others to think less of the President, if he can at all achieve it. This is just an example of desperation by a weak, feckless, POS congress person.
Rubio might not notice because he is distracted by the shoes Trump gave him that are several sizes too large for the little dude.
No law enforcement to stop the street from being blocked? No law enforcement to deal with those threatening others? No law enforcement to deal with people egress intentionally restricted by civilians? WTAF!
🚨 JUST NOW: A rioter who JUMPED IN FRONT OF a civilian employee driving out of Delaney Hall in Newark LOST a game of chicken with the vehicle Pure FAFO. Diving in front of a convoy of fast moving government contracted vehicles is a GREAT way to spend domestic nights in the
It seems like your math is not mathing. I'm counting 3.4 trillion, maybe 3.5 trillion. Regardless it's still big numbers that most people can't wrap their heads around, including me. Hell, I have difficulty with $100,000. However, despite that downturn in numbers, somebody, or multiple somebody's, made that amount I'm willing to bet. Those numbers have to go somewhere and it's just not to most of us.
🚨 EVERYTHING THAT COULD GO WRONG FOR MARKETS WENT WRONG TODAY. S&P 500 down -1.65%, wiping out $1.14 trillion. Nasdaq down -2.60%, wiping out $1.11 trillion. Gold down -3.38%, wiping out $1 trillion. Silver down -6.9%, wiping out $280 billion. Bitcoin down -6.31%, wiping out
Isn't there video of the accuser admitting that they lied about who did the crime, admitting that they had done it instead, whatever this Colorado thing is, something about elections interference or something?
They railroaded Tina Peters. Jena Griswold should face prison for this injustice against Peters and the citizens of Colorado. Tina Peters Case: Is it your position that someone can be charged with crimes they never committed?”
"Journalist" used to be defined, and I'm paraphrasing here for the idiots who might read this, as someone who sought the truth behind a particular subject. Told the who, what, when, where, and the stated why, never injecting their own opinion into the story. Letting the reader determine the why themselves, trusting the reader to form their own opinion on the subject. Today, again, paraphrasing for the idiots, a "journalist" starts with their own opinion, MAY... try to get one fact to support their opinion, then publishes a "story" as fact, trying to bolster a particular narrative. Regardless, their objective is to further what ever narrative it is they support. Increasingly, that narrative is in support of socialism, communism, progressivism, pedophilia, islam, and any other ideal that tears at the fabric of America and "western culture". What these "journalists" don't, refuse, or are incapable of understanding is that they would be amoung the first killed by such a regime, for several reasons; 1 - They are standing at the forefront of a event. 2 - Their potential for spreading the incorrect narrative. 3 - Their published support for gays, alphabet people ( lgbt... what ever ) and/or their direct involvement in such activities. Anyone who says I'm a liar is either a left-wing ideologist, a muslim, an actual liar themselves and/or a useful idiot for those ideals. In this particular instance, someone who has never created a job and is incapable of creating a job that produces a physical item, has never successfully operated and is incapable of creating a business long term, is actively tearing at someone who is/has, and hides behind their screen telling others to beware of the "bad man". Never producing actual evidence, only supposition and innuendo. Has also never been punched in the mouth for their indiscretion. I'm just sayin'...
Larry Ellison acaba de hacer la única pregunta que ningún periodista en la Tierra puede responder. Un periodista del Wall Street Journal le dijo a la cara a Larry Ellison que Elon Musk no sabe lo que hace. Ellison solo le hizo una pregunta. Ellison: “Este tipo aterriza
"The universe is a strange and wonderful place. We are figuring out the strange I hope we never lose the wonder." Patrick J Soule
The Cosmic Treasure Chest: 10 Million Galaxies in a Single FrameThis is the first major image released by the largest digital camera ever built for astronomy — the 3.2-gigapixel LSST Camera on the Vera C. Rubin Observatory.And it is absolutely staggering.Every single speck of
Yes, yes, yes. Next they need to disband teachers unions. Why you ask? Teachers caught diddling kids at school by the schools, commit additional crime by not reporting it to law enforcement, the teachers union moves them to a different school, even out of state, and further exposes the innocent to a predator. Crimes commited in this scenario, at a minimum: 1 - Molestation of a child. The teacher, State & Federal crimes. 2 - Failure to report the crime. The school admin, State & Federal crimes. 3 - Conspiracy to commit. The union, school, and teacher, State & Federal crimes. 4 - Crossing state lines in avoidance of a felony and/or the commission of a felony. The teacher, the union or school if they escort the teacher. Federal crimes. The Education department funded the whole enterprise. Teacher, school, and union. "Oh, they didn't know that would happen, it's not the Education departments fault." If they funded it, it's their job to become aware, completely and thoroughly investigate allegations of misconduct. They wouldn't do it, they're complicit. Additionally, education got worse throughout our country despite multiple billions of dollars being thrown at it. Kind of like the homeless situation, once the organization is formed to combat it, if you are successful, you lose your job, so there's no incentive to be successful. Additionally they pay top people ludicrous salaries.
Why? What compassion do you have for the convicted? Their adults, they did wrong, regardless of the motivation, they got caught, tried, found guilty. Now they need to do the time for the various crimes, THEY commited. Theoretically, one of them is convicted of attempted murder, felony battery on police, conspiracy to commit. Those individually could carry 25 + 10 + 8years = 43 years. Doing time for one crime is not doing time for another crime too. Subsequent potential offenders see the 43 years, with no time off for good behavior or parole, their not going to risk it, if their a "normal" person. Those of the continuing crime mind set are abnormal and don't give 2 s**ts about what they get convicted of. To those, it's a game.
@SaltyGoat17 10 - 25, most serious convictions = longest sentences, to run consecutively, not concurrently. Concurrently is not a sentence for an additional conviction steming from the original action by the convicted.
That's not the point of the conversation I overheard. An example would be, the bearded police man came up to the barricade tape, stood close infront of the person doing the videoing, telling him to not record. If the guy doing the video formed a knife hand, then struck that officer in the throat, hard, in the front of his throat and everyone who are told by police to not record, do the same, it might be hundreds of people across england. Would the police shut up about you can't record? I think it would be bad if that happenedin America. However, would it be bad in england too, considering the current increase of police misbehavior? Not my country, I have no idea about the actual situation, just the amount of things bring currently posted.
@AIUpdatesX What kind of data collection, retention, use, and/or sales from that data is there? The use of these can't be completely free for use without them selling some amount of info collected
@GOP_is_Gutless The government h ates to lose, they'd prefer to look stupid
You might like
