NEW: Using Personnel-Adjusted YPRR for the 2024 ROOKIE WIDE RECEIVER class to separate those who truly stand out among their peers. Keys: 🔹Fewer WRs on field = higher YPRR 🔸Which WRs performed above/below expectations 📉Concerns for under-performers 🆓 pff.com/news/fantasy-f…
@PFF_Macri Dig the article. I'm looking at the premium college stats and has this been released for the public to dig into a bit more? I would love to better understanding how the metric calculated.
@PFF_Macri This might over-adjusting for personnel. Part of the reason why 3 WR sets have lower WR YPRR than 2 WR sets is that the 3rd WR is worse than the first 2. I expect you'd see less of a drop in YPRR if you looked at the same WR in 2 vs. 3 WR sets, rather than the avg of all WRs.
@PFF_Macri Well UT & UGa have TEs who command targets vs many of the other teams. Wouldn’t it make more sense to take a WRs target share & divide it by the cumulative target share of the main folks in each personnel group. Each iteration is obviously more data & time. Thx though! Good info
@PFF_Macri Pretty surprising about McConkey. I'm very high on the guy, but stats like this show he isn't as perfect as I want him to be (esp. for fantasy)