Calling it a hush money trial is so 2023 Now that we actually know the case, it’s clear that it’s much more It’s an election interference one & the judge said so yesterday I explain for @CNNOpinion cnn.com/2024/04/16/opi…
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Poor DemoKKKrat spoogepistol, losing in all the fed courts, now about to lose on appeal from the thoroughly corrupt Boast & Bragg. You analeater DemoKKKrats don't have much left, do ya?
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Not sure why the networks refuse to call it what it is. They keep saying hush money. That’s not it
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion You mean it wasn’t the Russians?
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Yes! But unfortunately many of the TV heads will keep calling it that. It’s catchy & has few syllables, and describes things regular folks understand. The challenge for this DA is to get this jury to understand how the pieces fit together beyond just paying a porn star on the DL.
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Then please inform CNN. They continue to run chyrons with those words, as well as using that phrase in their commentary.
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion The allegations are that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal an agreement with others to unlawfully influence the 2016 presidential election.
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Yes, the trial is election interference. Welcome to the truth side.
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion The media purposely chooses the salacious moniker.
@NormEisen @CNNOpinion Is it significantly different than the John Edwards case? I realize that Edwards didn’t have the money himself to pay off the woman. To me that makes Edward the situation more problematic than Trump’s but that’s just me