The KONA BLUE documents corroborate comments Elizondo made to the NYT re: the “storage” of “materials” “recovered from” UAP. The *intent* of AAWSAP and KB was to receive (from “governmental or privatized” “holders/stewards”) and analyze such materials. Grusch said the same.
With all do respect, this proves nothing. Kona Blue was denied and it’s no proof that such material exist or has existed. Until we have concrete evidence of anomalous materials or any object exhibiting the five observables that were coined by AATIP this topic is nothing more than a cover for our trillion dollar militaries failure to protect our homeland and assets against low end tech like drones
@MvonRen Some more background by Hal Puthoff @_SolFoundation: youtu.be/9azht9pCDwg?si…
@MvonRen Congressional appropriations for $22M had been awarded to Bigelow Aerospace with the money to be used for the relocation of exotic materials from Lockheed and the “management of the program, research, and assessments of the threat posed by the objects.” nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/…
@MvonRen I’m suspicious about how this is being rolled out…
@MvonRen Just saw you sir in this new clip. Thank you for your work. m.youtube.com/watch?v=pIjOJU…
@MvonRen “Corroborate.” No. The repetition of a rumor (or falsehood) does not equal verification.
@MvonRen There is also "corroborated" info on WMD in Iraq. Show the data and show the results SOL has. Show TTSA's samples sent for analysis. Again, documents are words on paper. Show the data. That goes for both sides.
@MvonRen This rightly rejected, nonsensical proposal was written by the groomers of Elizondo and Grusch. Of course it will say the same. When will your groomer share your nonsense op ed?