Bridge design for vessel collision. A🧵 The main span of the Francois Scott Key Bridge is 1300 ft. It also has 185 ft of clearance, making this a massive bridge. This type of bridge is considered complex. Baltimore is in for a long haul before replacement. Here is why. 1/x
We design modern bridges for ship impact, but this was not always the case. In 1980 the Sunshine Skyway Bridge also collapsed from vessel strike. The photo below is the original Skyway. Similar bridges and identical failure. The Skyway collapse changed bridge design. 2/x
The Baltimore bridge collapsed because it got hit by container ship. What failed first? It appears the bow of the ship made contact with the vertical columns that supported the truss superstructure, causing it to have a cascade failure. 3/x
This bridge was going to fail from this event. It simply was not designed for an equivalent static force that is well over 3 million pounds. The container ship, assuming the navigation channel is centered, veered over 500 feet off course. Why did the whole thing fall? 4/x
The whole truss fell because this is a continuous bridge. This means that the 3 span unit behaves as as one. If one span fails, the maximum dead loads redistributes. This provides benefits to load resistance and is how we design modern bridges for this. How? 5/x
Modern bridges deal with vessel collision two ways. The first is to use a dolphin. This is a mass of rock, sand, and steel that serves to stop the vessel before it makes contact with the bridge. Likely the new bridge replacement will use a dolphin as one method. 6/x
@MattDursh @RMConservative I would think ships would be mandated to travel under the central span, which is the highest & widest section. But that’s just me thinking out loud.
@MattDursh Lots of talk about cascading failure and how much of the bridge collapsed. A) I wonder how many people see the close-spaced approach spans and assume that, like, 10 of them went down. B) In the grand scheme, is the loss of one section really much more catastrophic than 2 or 3?