Mark A. Bandy @MarkABandy

No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.” Until now. Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions. Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.” It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years. And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this. This isn’t “turning his back.” This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies. You want the special relationship? Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons. Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have. The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year. Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure. Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian. You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy. Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes. We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something. In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion. Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact. You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power. Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer. He sees what you refuse to admit: the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945. It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated. We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves. Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing. The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality. And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other. Look into it. 💀⚖️🗡️

The Economist @TheEconomist

3 months ago

No British government has ever imagined that an American president might turn his back on the special relationship between both nations. Until now econ.st/3OZceLM Illustration: Mona Eing & Michael Meissner

724 146 302 534K 52

@roricait @jzipple @maxeduppower Do you even understand the difference between the collectivism demanded by the state and the collectivism of a voluntary organization like the church? pls stop

@JanCBS @CBSEveningNews Too little, too late

@BishopBarron Amen

@DanielJHannan A measure of humility.

@WDWNT It will never be implemented due to maintenance costs. Imagineering can propose great new gadgets but park management won’t want the upkeep costs. They’d rather have screens that you turn off, turn back on. See TIBA. Lots of screens.

We have reached the point where the only recourse is to cease funding the Church. The bishops have repeatedly refused to present and teach the fullness of the faith but instead have cherry-picked only those issues which secular society deems appropriate, ie. immigration. Cut off the money and maybe some of them will develop a spine.

@disneytipsguy I sat down next to this person earlier today. I do not understand people who think this is ok. Raised in a barn much?

@krismeetsworld You are a vile person.

facebook.com/share/p/19muUd…

@BernieSanders His blood is on your hands.

@KamalaHarris His blood is on your hands.

@JohnFugelsang His blood is on your hands.

@briantylercohen His blood is on your hands.

@PeteButtigieg His blood is on your hands.

No, it’s not the guns; it’s the people; stop with such nonsense; ppl have abdicated their personal responsibility and blame horrific evil on inanimate objects; these deranged ppl on the left cannot justify their political opinions or the abhorrent behavior in their personal lives so they blame externals; personal character, discipline and the virtues are required and ppl do not possess these virtues today; it’s not the gun; it’s the person; so pls STOP

@AParkMind Why are they cannibalizing existing attractions with rethemes? Obviously it’s a cheaper route because you don’t have to invest in the underlying infrastructure but it plays poorly. Ask him how much it’d take to get him to retire?

@DisneyParks @WaltDisneyWorld Not opposed to drinking but when Disney’s corporate model turns to selling more alcohol and sports betting via ESPN, you’ve lost the vision

@DrewDisneyDude Not opposed to drinking but when Disney’s corporate model turns to selling more alcohol and sports betting via ESPN, you’ve lost the vision

@CatholicFQ Looks familiar!