10 years of tech journalism licking every boot it can in return for the feeblest of access leads to people sincerely writing tweets like this the product is dogshit. that it took a reviewer to point it out, and not a single person involved in its development, is damning.
10 years of tech journalism licking every boot it can in return for the feeblest of access leads to people sincerely writing tweets like this the product is dogshit. that it took a reviewer to point it out, and not a single person involved in its development, is damning.
every piece of hardware should fear bad reviews. that should be the standard.
@LukePlunkett Biggest red flag was Time's co-chairs being investors... And the pin listed in the Best 200 Inventions of 2023 in the magazine. Also who the hell needs something like this? Majority of people barely have internet/media literacy to do basic fact checking, but we need AI pins?
@LukePlunkett Is this that smart pin Marques reviewed? Because that was bad.
@LukePlunkett I gotta say that I sure am enjoying watching these tech pissants get really defensive and squirmy over this.
@LukePlunkett Gotta love it when even blue check chuds are dunking on this guy
@LukePlunkett They knew. The point was to get to market and extract value as quickly as possible before the bigger bubble breaks.
@LukePlunkett It's just a completely pointless product.
@LukePlunkett Are they expecting people to review the potential of this thing or something? You can't say "buy this thing now, it doesn't really work, but it might someday, 10/10"
@LukePlunkett They act like all he did was shit on it for no reason. He gave it fair props for construction and concepts, but concepts don't make a working product or a good product, and HAVING a smartwatch and a cellphone makes it basicly a waste of $700+$25amo.