In a criminal trial, it’s possible to remove a disruptive defendant from the courtroom, if after warnings and admonishments, the defendant continues to disrupt or obstruct the process. This is allowable under the theory that an unruly defendant can forfeit his/her right to be present at their own trial. Obviously, this could put a defendant at a disadvantage because it could taint the impression the jury has of a defendant by not being present. 👀👀 #TrumpTrial
@Julius_Kim I'll believe it when I see it😎 but we can hope🙏🙏🙏
@Julius_Kim He was intolerable in his Fraud case. And was not held accountable for his outbursts. Do you think Judge Merchan will be less tolerable of Trump’s antics in the courtroom?
@Julius_Kim What happened to continuing to disrupt the proceedings and after warnings given being help in contempt….and going to jail.
@Julius_Kim Do you think the Judge will surprise him with detainment for violating the gag order?
@Julius_Kim I think I know the answer to this, but figured it can't hurt to check with a genuine lawyer: Can he repeatedly just claim the 5th?