Jon Pernten (I/We/Us/Me/My/Myself) @JonPerne

The conspiracy theorists were right A new FDA data mining report shows they knew the Covid vaccine had 25 major side effects and they all conspired to hide it from the public Senator Ron Johnson’s Senate PSI Majority Staff Interim Report has been released on FDA data mining and the March 2021 analysis by Dr. Ana Szarfman There was a “masking” in the standard FDA system, where signals from Pfizer and Moderna reportedly cancelled each other out Meaning they lied and hid the side effects from the public and told you it was 100% safe and effective I have compared the whole list for you: Neurological & Dysautonomia • Bell’s palsy (Suppressed Signal) • Paraesthesia ear (Suppressed Signal) • Bradykinesia (Suppressed Signal) • Basal ganglia stroke (Suppressed Signal) • Cerebral artery occlusion (Suppressed Signal) • Thalamic infarction • Sinus rhythm abnormality • Agonal rhythm • Diaphragmatic spasm • Dementia (Pfizer) Cardiac • Sudden cardiac death (Suppressed Signal) • Acute left ventricular failure (Suppressed Signal) • Diastolic dysfunction (Suppressed Signal) • Ejection fraction abnormal (Suppressed Signal) • Hypertensive emergency (Suppressed Signal) • Blood pressure systolic changes (Suppressed Signal) • Aortic stenosis (Suppressed Signal) • Cardiac failure chronic • Acute myocardial infarction (Pfizer, Moderna) • Cardiac telemetry abnormal (Pfizer) (Suppressed Signal) Vascular & Pulmonary • Pulmonary infarction (Suppressed Signal) • Embolic stroke • Ischaemic stroke • Aortic aneurysm rupture • May-Thurner syndrome • Hypomagnesaemia (Suppressed Signal) Other • Cholecystitis acute (Suppressed Signal) • AST/ALT ratio abnormal • Mastoid disorder • Cardiac assistance device user • Brain natriuretic peptide increased • Asymptomatic COVID-19 (Pfizer) (Suppressed Signal) The FDA’s standard analytical method allegedly masked “obscured” statistical safety signals in the data Aka they lied

“UFC is so embarrassing at the White House.” - say the people who were ok with this trash…

A cold doesn’t start when you wake up with symptoms. By the time you feel it, your immune system has already been fighting behind the scenes. That’s why prevention matters. The habits you practice every day, your sleep, hydration, nutrition, and recovery, determine how prepared your body is when a challenge comes. This is the exact cold protocol I follow to support my immune system before, during, and after symptoms. Get exclusive protocols, wellness strategies, and the latest research delivered straight to your inbox.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

🚨 Trump just ASSASSINATED the leader of Tren De Aragua

It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species. It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence. Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance. These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above. If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does. This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it. @brownstoneinst

Paul D. Thacker @thackerpd

2 days ago

@RandPaul DOCS: hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/upl… "SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)."

152 1K 4K 616K 2K

INSANE 🇨🇦 Canada sending $100,000,000 to Palestine, announced just now from Paris France 🤯 $100 MILLION. I’m sure Ukraine is next

20 rules for young men: 1. Never date a friend’s ex 2. It’s ok to go to the movies by yourself 3. Hygiene is more important than you think 4. Know the different between love and lust 5. Stay informed on what’s going on.  Don’t be a sheep 6. Have a sense of humor but don’t joke about your dreams and goals 7.  Study the types of people who upset you and why 8. Stand up to bullies.  You’ll only have to do it once. 9. Don’t bully people weaker than you 10. Learn how to tell stories 11. Don’t complain. 80% of people don’t care about your problems and 20% are glad you have them 12. Be impressed by the things that matter 13. When coming across a successful person, talk less, ask more. 14. Leave a lasting impression after people meet you 15. Don’t feel guilty for being too ambitious 16. Be mentally and emotionally ready to lose loved ones at some point of your life. 17. Always have some cash with you 18. Regardless of what you get paid per hour, give your best.  19. Avoid porn at all cost. 20. You never marry a girl, you marry her entire family.

Cenk Uygur? Silent. Mehdi Hasan? Silent. Ana Kasparian? Silent. Francesca Albanese? Silent. Greta Thunberg? Silent.

Some important background to contextualize the headline: — Only 8% of crime guns are recovered > Less than 20% of recovered guns are sent for tracing > Of the traced guns, 71% are domestic In other words, this report is making a conclusion based on a sample size of only 1.6%. Folks will know I’m pretty agnostic on firearms, though I’ve used them including from my time as a reservist when I was trained & certified to operate the C-7. What I feel strongly about is evidence-based policy making, and I challenge anyone to justify making policy on a 1.6% sample size of anything, never mind something as serious as guns and public safety.

Judy Trinh @judyatrinh

3 days ago

Most guns used in Canadian crimes were not smuggled in from abroad: internal reports ctvnews.ca/canada/article…

486 29 57 71K 22

@CP24 You should retract this headline as the data goes completely against what you have written.

@alleria_eh @l3v1at4an Guess you want us to not believe our lying ears. It was clearly a hard F. Either way, she is completely useless. This is potentially being tied to the embassy shooting which she doesn't care about as seen with telling a terrorist referee that he can come to TO.

@Calibremag @Polysesouvient @DanforthFSC @rcmpgrcpolice A class action lawsuit or any lawsuit for that matter would be great. @IanRunkle

In less than three minutes I exposed how uneducated and dishonest the woke right are when it comes to Iran.

@ryangerritsen Agreed. Also order your booze from Alberta. Better selection and cheaper.

@Meg_BunchONmbrs @globeandmail That is factually incorrect.

Canada's New Social Media Ban is NOT About Your Children | Here's What They're NOT Telling You Canada just announced the Digital Safety Act — a social media ban for anyone under 16. Most Canadians think this is about protecting children. It isn't. To enforce a social media ban, every single Canadian will have to prove their age by attaching government-approved ID to their social media accounts. That's not child protection. That's a digital ID. And once you're verified on one platform, that verification follows you everywhere — linking every account you own under your real identity. But it gets worse. This isn't a standalone policy. This is the missing piece that connects Bill C-9, C-22 and C-8 into a complete surveillance and censorship system. Bill C-9 defines what you can and cannot say online. Bill C-22 forces platforms to save your data for up to one year. Bill C-8 gives the government the power to cut you off the internet entirely. The digital ID created by this social media ban is what connects all three. And they're selling it to you as child protection. Don't be fooled. All these bills are interconnected — and this is the last piece of the puzzle. youtube.com/live/tiwBDgstT…

No. The story was not overlooked or buried. Israel immediately informed us the attack happened. There were numerous investigations. The Captain of the USS Liberty was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. Israel apologized and paid reparations. The truth is, it's just not a big story. It's a tragic story, and no doubt. But it isn't a big story. 34 Americans died on the USS Liberty in 1967. 11,363 Americans died in the jungles of Vietnam in 1967. Friendly Fire is horrific, but not uncommon. There is very little reason for a sixty-year old friendly fire incident to be widely known about, much less widely discussed. For example, that same year, 1967, a US Marine Corp jet attacked a US Army position on Hill 875 in Vietnam, killing 42 American soldiers. 59 years later, not many remember Hill 875, not because it wasn't horrific -- it killed more Americans than the attack on the USS Liberty -- but because it isn't useful as a talking point to implicate the US/Israel relationship. As to the second part of your question, we aren't discussing the USS Liberty today because of new information. We are discussing the USS Liberty today because of old -- even ancient -- grudges.

Steven @Steven28484

6 days ago

@JeremyDBoreing Jeremy, do you believe this story was overlooked or buried for a period of time? And from a broader perspective, how do you think Israel’s actions and response will be viewed as more information becomes public? Genuinely interested in hearing different perspectives on this.

45 7 71 299K 6

Massie's "Justice Delayed" speech on the House floor today asserts that Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty with the intention to murder its crew, and that the US government covered it up. However, the comprehensive documentary record—spanning more than a dozen official US and Israeli investigations, including reviews by the CIA, NSA, and Joint Chiefs of Staff—completely refutes these claims, proving the incident was a tragic case of mistaken identity and friendly fire. You don't have to take their conclusions granted; you just need to look at the evidence. Massie and his gang have no intention of doing that-- none of these people have looked at the evidence; there are no "Liberty Truthers" who ever engage with the specific evidence, because then they look too obviously grotesque and ideologically-motivated. If the facts of the case don't matter, why are these people obsessed with a friendly-fire incident that happened in 1967? Because they want to convince you--despite all evidence and lack of motive--to hate Israel and Jews. There is absolutely nothing else going on here, and the proof for that is how enthusiastically they lie about what actually happened that day. They need to say Israel attacked deliberately, because that's how they fool Americans into distrusting and hating Israel. And they need to say the US covered it up, because that's how they explain the lack of evidence for their claims. I promised a debunking, so here it is. **************************** Massie: Israel deliberately attacked the ship with the intent to leave no survivors. There is absolutely zero evidence it was a premeditated strike. The Israeli military correctly identified the ship at dawn, but a duty officer erased the ship's marker from the naval plot hours later because the information was considered stale. Later, misread explosions on the coast led to a severely flawed speed calculation by Israeli torpedo boats (estimating 30 knots instead of 5), which classified the ship as a hostile warship that was then misidentified as an Egyptian supply vessel. If Israel had intended to sink the ship, they would have used iron bombs—but the Israeli air controller deliberately diverted the flight carrying iron bombs away from the ship. When an Israeli pilot recognized Latin letters on the hull (Arab warships used Arabic script), the attack was immediately halted with the order, "Leave her!" Israel then dispatched rescue helicopters, ceased fire immediately, and apologized within hours, before Washington had even publicly acknowledged the incident. Massie: The attack was a 25-minute unprovoked assault using napalm, and lifeboats were machine-gunned. In reality, the air attack lasted approximately 14 minutes, and every official investigation confirms there were only two Mirages and two Super-Mystères involved. (Even survivor advocates who previously claimed there were up to 30 sorties have conceded on the record that there were only two initial jets). The jets dropped napalm because they had been diverted mid-mission from bombing Egyptian infantry, not because of a surgical plan to sink a steel ship. Furthermore, the torpedo boat did not machine-gun lifeboats to execute survivors; it actually recovered a damaged life raft put overboard by the crew that was marked "US Navy." This recovery is exactly how the Israelis realized the ship was American. Massie: It was a clear day with unlimited visibility and the American flag was flying proudly. While Massie argues the flag should have made the ship's identity obvious, gun-camera film from the attacking pilots and shipboard photos confirm that the smoke from the burning ship was rising straight up--meaning there was essentially no wind. Because of the calm conditions, the flag hung limp and drooping against the mast rather than extended. The Navy Court of Inquiry specifically concluded that the calm weather and slow speed "may well have made the American flag difficult to identify." Massie: US rescue planes were recalled and the crew was left stranded for 17 hours. Massie implies that the recall of rescue planes points to a sinister cover-up-- but the US response was paralyzed by the fear of nuclear escalation. LBJ initially feared the attackers were Soviet, stating, "if this attack is by the Russians, this means war." The Sixth Fleet recalled its defending aircraft out of fear of sparking World War III, and this recall occurred long after the attack was already over. The USS Liberty was only in the war zone to begin with because of severe US communication failures. Five separate messages ordering the ship to withdraw 100 miles were misrouted and never reached the ship before the attack. Massie: Ward Boston declared the inquiry invalid, proving a cover-up. He asked Congress to enter a declaration by Ward Boston into the record, claiming the official court of inquiry was invalid. Boston's much later affidavit recanting his original findings is hearsay (the admiral he quoted was deceased) and self-incriminating, as Boston himself co-authored the original findings under oath. Admiral Isaac Kidd, who actually led the Naval Court of Inquiry, said in 1991 that his investigation found zero evidence of a deliberate attack. When asked if they found a "smoking gun," he said, "we didn't even find a water pistol."

@neveragainlive1 Must be an election year in Toronto.

Do you think Mark Carney named Omar Alghabra to his Jew-Hate Combat Clouncil because of this letter from Omar condemning the family-friendly Walk with Israel? - OR - Because Omar lobbied the government to remove Hamas and Hezbollah from its list of designated terror groups?