Meg🧣 @HiddlesMess

‘MICHAEL’ is officially the biggest music biopic of all-time.

Every time a Michael Jackson hater runs out of legal arguments regarding his 2005 acquittal, they rush to the internet and pull out the same sensationalist story: “The Neverland police reports and the disturbing books.” They act as if it's some newly discovered bombshell, but the truth is simple: all of this was debated, scrutinized, and ultimately rejected by the jury in court more than 20 years ago. Let me explain once and for all what the FBI and the American justice system actually concluded about the books found in Michael's room. Michael never even touched those books (zero fingerprints). Let's start with the fact that immediately destroys this narrative. Forensic investigators examined the books seized from Neverland and found that Michael Jackson's fingerprints were not present on the interior pages of any of them. Michael owned a massive library of more than 10,000 books. As he explained in interviews, he received thousands of gifts, packages, photography books, and publications from fans, photographers, and publishers around the world. Many of those items went straight onto shelves without him ever opening them or even knowing exactly what they contained. The prosecution tried to blame a man for books he may never have even flipped through. They were 100% legal art books. The titles seized by investigators, including works associated with artists such as James Bidgood, Simen Johan, and Kelly Klein, were collections of photography, naturist imagery, and adult artistic content. They were legally published, available through mainstream retailers, and cataloged by major libraries. None of them met the legal definition of child pornography. If there had been even the slightest indication of illegal content, Michael would have been charged with possessing prohibited material back in either 1993 or 2003. That never happened. Even the prosecutor admitted it. Ron Zonen, one of the prosecutors who worked tirelessly to secure a conviction in 2005, later acknowledged a key fact: “There was no child pornography. There were no videos involving children.” The prosecution attempted to use the books as part of a broader theory of grooming, hoping to create a particular impression in the minds of jurors. But speculation is not evidence, and the strategy ultimately failed. In 2016, tabloids tried to revive the story. Websites such as Radar Online republished old allegations and claimed to reveal shocking new evidence. Critics pointed out serious issues with those reports, including allegations that certain images had been digitally altered or presented in a misleading way. Some observers also noted the inclusion of material from works published years after the original Neverland searches, raising questions about the accuracy and reliability of the reports. The controversy only reinforced how heavily disputed those claims were. The FBI found nothing illegal. Federal authorities spent years examining allegations involving Michael Jackson. Investigators reviewed computers, hard drives, documents, and other materials seized from Neverland. After all of that scrutiny, no child pornography charges resulted from those investigations. Reports indicated that investigators found adult heterosexual pornography, which is completely legal for an adult to possess. Michael Jackson was an adult man, and possessing legal adult pornography is not a crime anywhere in the United States. The jury already saw all of this. During the 2005 trial, jurors reviewed the books, heard the testimony, examined the evidence, and listened to the prosecution's theories. They were not kept in the dark. They saw the very material that critics continue to cite today. After months of testimony and deliberation, the result was clear Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all 14 counts. Bringing up these books today as if they are some newly discovered smoking gun does not demonstrate a deep understanding of the case.

Justice For MJ's CSA Survivors @MJTruthSeeker7

a week ago

I addressed this already. Keep defending a pedophile #MJFam #MJGuilty

55 15 156 619K 57

You have to be VERY innocent and NOT guilty to have your lawyer who defended your case 20 years ago to go on live television to speak in your defense with no obligation, no payment, and nothing to gain personally.

Aaand this is why I don't trust the sudden onset of the idea that "college is a scam". It's not a coincidence that higher education has started losing its value in society's eyes now that women outperform men.

Dr Juliet Turner @juliet_turner6

7 months ago

POV: you are a young woman celebrating a recent academic success

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

6K 13K 145K 16.2M 10K

— this man made a song BEGGING God & the heavens to not take him bc he didn’t want to depart from the love of his life. genius! this is r&b excellence at its finest! to be that in love, how beautiful. 🥹😭😭🤧 he was out here writing masterpieces!

Chodzi o kolor. Cry my eyes *violet*, jej oczy w golden era Hollywood były uznawane za wyjątkowe właśnie ze względu na kolor

inka @swiftflake

8 months ago

słucham sobie tego i się zastanawiam, co ma w sumie Elizabeth Taylor do tego wszystkiego XDDDD open.spotify.com/track/1jgTiNob…

7 0 47 6K 1

@omiomomi Hej, aktualne?

A man raped a squirrel to death and the males think it’s funny. Degenerate lots.

El Renacido @RenacidoParody

a year ago

¿Ustedes creen que esté bien que una señora de más de 50 años grabe videos así? x.com/divinecoup/sta…

8K 789 26K 7.6M 3K

Święta, święta i po świętach. A to oznacza, że nadeszło WOŚP. A to natomiast oznacza, że zaczynają się ataki - między innymi ten sugerujący, że pieniądze zebrane przez WOŚP nie mają żadnego znaczenia w kontekście budżetu NFZ. 🧵 [Rok temu napisałem ten wątek i udało się dotrzeć do sporej ilości osób. W związku z kolejnym finałem, chciałbym go przypomnieć (z lekkim uaktualnieniem), bo widzę, że niestety podobna narracja jest ciągle utrzymywana.] Po latach prób obrzydzenia samej osoby Owsiaka i sugerowania (nieskutecznie) jakichś przewałów w fundacji w ostatnich latach pojawiła się nowa narracja. Atakuje ona WOŚP od drugiej strony i ma na celu sugerowanie, że zbiórka nie ma żadnego znaczenia w kontekście naszej Służby Zdrowia bo zbiera grosze w porównaniu do budzetu NFZ. W końcu WOŚP zbiera ledwo paręset milionów, a roczny budżet NFZ to ponad 150 miliardów, więc o czym w ogóle tu rozmawiać! Co ciekawe ta forma ataku ma miejsce zarówno z prawej strony, która nienawidzi Owsiaka za jego ideologię ("róbta co chceta") i "deprawujący młodzież" Woodstock jak i z lewej strony, która chyba próbuje udowodnić, że takie PRYWATNE akcje są niczym w porównaniu do potęgi państwa i to "libkowy" wymysł. Ten sposób argumentacji pokazuje niezrozumienie jak działa, jak jest zorganizowana i jak jest finansowana Służba Zdrowia w Polsce. Więc wyjaśnijmy po krótce jak to wygląda. Przecież skoro budżet NFZ to setki miliardów to jaki problem kupić sprzęt?!

z racji iż zbliżają się wybory - w których będę uczestniczyć jako wyborca i jako członek komitetu, informacja brzmi: JEŚLI ODMAWIACIE PRZYJĘCIA KARTY REFERENDALNEJ, DO SEJMU LUB DO SENATU, MÓWICIE TO W MOMENCIE PODANIA DOWODU OSOBIE Z KOMISJI I PROSICIE O ODNOTOWANIE PROŚBY‼️

"The young lady was hitched to".. WTF she was a child and he killed her. I need off this planet.

Besties, czy ktoś się wybiera?

czy on w tamtym momencie powiedzial jeszcze the loudest show ever czy mi się wydaje😭 #HarryStylesLoveOnTourWarsaw #LoveOnTourWarsaw

@lirectioner Już nieaktualne, przykro mi :/

Odsprzedam bilet na #maneskin na jutro w cenie zakupu (płyta)… sprawa rodzinna nie mogę być na koncercie. Ktoś chętny?

@weronika_jagus Napisałam :)

SPRZEDAM BILET 230 zł PŁYTA Måneskin jutro w Warszawie #maneskinpoland #maneskinwarsaw #maneskin

@agusthere Tak, napisałam na dm