Here is a counterargument from @MickWest about what the Beavercreek UFO could be that includes information I was unaware of. youtu.be/xDkqKa_NQAo?si…
Here is a counterargument from @MickWest about what the Beavercreek UFO could be that includes information I was unaware of. youtu.be/xDkqKa_NQAo?si…
@HeyLukOverThere There have many sightings over the years of a Jellyfish looking thing (I guess we call it ) floating through the air , some pictures if you search
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest If I could just make a suggestion... Don't listen to any theories where Mick has to rely on words like "Probably" or "Likely". It means he's speculating and doesn't have the evidence to support his take.
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest Why nobody cares about objects in the sky unless they are as well documented as the tic tac or better yet - involve meeting the pilots. We did this whole "things in the sky what is it?" back in the 50s.
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest "Simplest explanation by far" "It's a Bug". @DarrylJonkemp do you agree!?
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest Poplar fluff always moves in an EXACTLY straight horizontal line btw that's a FACT & now it's 💯 debunked because Mick found someone online that agrees with his analysis.
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest You are a true gentlemen!
@HeyLukOverThere @MickWest Always love your comments Dan! When Mick West says "A bug. That's the simplest explanation by far" that's not analysis. It's not the simplest explanation you strive for. It's the most accurate. The absolute smooth banking and acceleration appears more likely to be a small craft.