Hackworth @HackworthAI

Building quantitative AI systems Research @ Tensor Investment I trade crypto, fixed income, commodity, & ETFs Advisor & Builder @ AlphaNet tensorcorp.com Hong Kong Joined May 2025

Tweets

616
Followers

637
Following

145
Likes

1K

Hackworth @HackworthAI

9 hours ago

@IAmDouglasKim They were already slaves in their shithole countries (SE Asia and such). It wouldn't have gotten worse.

0 0 1 42 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

9 hours ago

@arcticinstincts She's attractive but cringe btw. Such a shame

0 0 4 95 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

9 hours ago

@deanwball Lets just say nothing is surprising. Let 'em ban and see where the cards fall. If they achieve their calling then they get an A+. If not then the walls will be crumbling as a macrocosm

0 0 4 194 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

9 hours ago

@arcticinstincts Baizuo - love it. 国人 🤝

0 0 4 98 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

9 hours ago

@RayKump You've clearly hit the nail in the head - if he made a wish to optimize himself instead of be a pussy woke, he would've been better off. Advice to many ppl actually

0 0 4 942 0

View Details

@ChrisRMcGuire If you look deeper - you're a retard if you think you know better than the Ashkenazis at $GOOG Why not stop being a loser and have some other cognitive skillsets other than China-hatin?

0 0 5 255 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

11 hours ago

@jibranhutch 太鸡吧丑了。。 as a Chinese chinq, this is atrocious

0 0 2 266 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

12 hours ago

@teortaxesTex Lisan el Loser

0 0 3 435 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

3 days ago

@dunne_insights Calling equity investment subsidies is quite the stretch.

0 0 3 36 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

4 days ago

What are you suggesting otherwise? The asinine notion that access should be taken away? That closed source is safer and better for them? (Exactly OAI/ANTH self-serving argument) Even using your fallacious gun analogy - if criminals/bad actors have access to weapons anyways, why wouldn't normal citizens have right to bear arms?

0 0 9 235 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

4 days ago

@DCinvestor That may not be what they're thinking but could be eventual byproduct. It's presumed that frontier AI will already be a big part of "services economy"

0 0 2 62 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@mean_field_zane Econometrics has lost its edge (long ago, in trading/investment at least [not sure the use case here])

1 0 3 495 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@henrysgao Man you are obsessed. Years down the line in a retirement home you probably wished you lived life more and spent less time fuming about China.

0 0 3 88 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@BaldingsWorld This is a very sane point of view. Bravo

0 0 3 71 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@bgurley What would fund this "third party lab"? Who would have the incentives to provide funding for it? Reduces to "US gov", but even that's a stretch.

1 0 1 111 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@vshih2 Who cares, that's not the point. You think the headline is because they've worked in US?

0 0 2 491 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

@DeepValueBagger Can or will? It's unclear of whether this post is a statement or wish. If statement, its juvenile wishful thinking. If wish, China could give a rat's ass about what the west's ideology. The west has been undermining itself just fine.

0 0 16 725 0

View Details

Hackworth @HackworthAI

5 days ago

The first statement is the most important, anything otherwise is self defeat. The other points is fair game, if they are capable enough to enforce or incentivize it. US gov has not demonstrated coordinated efficiency in past 20 years - so if they had your entire list as TODOs, they would make little progress.