GarrettZ @GarrettZ
cryptographic currency speculator Joined June 2008-
Tweets4K
-
Followers6K
-
Following3K
-
Likes23K
Is Bitmine buying $HYPE? This address received 8.45K $ETH ($14M) and 108K $HYPE ($7M) from FalconX with similar behaviour as other Bitmine addresses
Just want to point out a few things wrong/missing from this analysis to give a more informed take: The takes on being a bucket shop are silly so won't even respond to that. I don't believe there is some "Holy" level of leverage to offer that the CME has mastered. The key is safety and being able to properly liquidate positions. People trading on high leverage want high leverage, period. Crypto Share of Volume: Share relative to Binance is making fresh highs. Still at just 15%. Keep in mind since this is a % of Binance rather than a % of the whole, this can go above 100% in best case scenario (not saying this is likely). AQAv2: 90% of the yield from USDC is being used to buy back HYPE. This is known but the flows don't start until October. Addition of $150-200M to ARR. HyperCore Priority Fees: This was essentially 0 two months ago and a $20M ARR currently. This has a lot of room to grow potentially and is yet another signal that when this team ships, there is immediate uptake and boost to revenue. HyperEVM network fees: burning around $1M HYPE/month Ticker auctions: burning around $2.5M/year HIP-4: brand new, currently no significant contribution. Kalshi and Polymarket have demonstrated PMF for Prediction Markets. I personally am not very bullish on this sector but maybe I'm wrong. HIP-5 and beyond: the team continues to ship and most things they ship see real uptake. I could imagine them eventually launching options among other things. The Regulatory Fork: Most serious money is still not allowed to use Hyperliquid. Hedge Funds are locked out because of LP agreements, and MMers for regulatory reasons. Opening up the market to America and to serious professionals like HFs/MMers. This would be tremendously bullish on volumes and liquidity. I call it a "fork" because the downside case is they get lawfared out forever. If this is your thesis, I implore you to watch this recent interview that I will link below with the CFTC chair. Hyperliquid as a Liquidity Backend: we have already seen large uptake of builder codes as consumer-facing products such as Phantom and Fomo offer perps to users in their frontends via their builder codes. The best case scenario for Hyperliquid is that it becomes one of the liquidity backends for traditional brokers and MMers. If Hyperliquid can continue offering better pricing than CME (as they do on BTC/ETH/SOL futures), this could become a large source of future volume in the good regulatory scenarios. Staking Rewards and Community Tokens: Lazy analysis values HYPE at its fully diluted value. More careful analysis realizes 1) most emissions go directly to existing token holders 2) future community emissions (nearly 40% of fully diluted supply) may never happen, partially happen, or be redirected to stakers over N number of years. If 1 HYPE staked today = 2 HYPE staked in N years, the price is effectively halved today (ignoring tax distortions). The circulating cap is around $17B today, and this isn't backing out any supply, including that owned by Hyperliquid Strategies DAT, which is presumably off the market. Hyperliquid.
@blknoiz06 Yeah but they dont want capitalists to control our politics and institutions. There's def a middle ground possible
$RE goes live on June 18, 2026. A global capital ocean supporting the real world. govern.re.xyz
weekly collector crypt blockworks stats just updated. all time highs in almost every single metric volume, profit, pack openings, revenue. higher, $cards
Hyperliquid reached new all-time highs in both daily and weekly new wallet creation. • 44,393 new wallets in a single day, including 34,978 that traded on @tradexyz. • 76,361 new wallets over the past week. The surge was notably driven by the $SPCX IPO.
[ ZOOMER ] CFTC CONSIDERS BLOCKING CME’S 24/7 OIL TRADING PROPOSAL, FOLLOWING CME RAISING CONCERNS OVER HYPERLIQUID: BBG
By community request, 10 new dashboards are live on hl.eco: Hyperliquid vs Robinhood: volume, revenue and capital efficiency, head to head. HL clears 92% of Robinhood's entire quarterly trading volume, and 8x its crypto volume. Coinbase $HYPE Buybacks: implied daily and monthly HYPE buy pressure from the USDC reserve-yield deal, across a range of yield assumptions. Prediction Markets: HIP-4 weekly volume next to Kalshi, Polymarket, Limitless, Opinion and Predict.fun. HYPE Holders: holder analysis across both HyperCore and HyperEVM, and retail vs whale counts over time. European HYPE ETPs: fees, staking yield, backing and size for every European HYPE product from 21Shares, VanEck, Bitwise and CoinShares. HIP-4 Governance: validators propose new prediction markets and vote how they resolve. See every live proposal and its quorum. All TWAPs: every active TWAP order across perp, spot and HIP-3, sliced over time. HIP-3 Oracle Health: per-feed price deviation and staleness across every HIP-3 market. Outcome Markets: Hyperliquid now runs four recurring daily binaries, BTC, ETH, SOL and HYPE. Each family tracked cycle by cycle with live YES and NO flows. Builder Analysis: a dedicated page for every builder code, with revenue and active-trader curves, coin mix, user concentration, and top traders by volume. Hyperliquid.
Money printer goes burrrrr with Markets app. Now live on both Android and iOS. Trade, follow, earn 24/7. Download & copy the best traders in the world. 👇
3Jane is now open to the public Mint USD3 to earn $JANE Liquidity mining details below
1/ The Sekai public testnet is now live. Sekai is a liquid staking protocol for Hyperliquid where anyone can launch their own LST - with instant exit liquidity via Sekai DEX from day one. Sekai brings a few things new to HyperEVM liquid staking - tradeable unstaking positions, holder-governed LSTs, a shared exit DEX, and staking-enabled primitives (HIP-3 exchanges, quote assets, etc.) managed directly from our frontend. This thread walks through all of these components, and who Sekai is for.
Practically every major reinsurance broker in the world now points business toward Re. Cover Re has $431.1M on the books as of June 2026. Over $247.4M in new business this year, against a $400M full-year stretch target. @karnsaroya breaks it down on @therollupco with @andyyy:
Citrini's thematic update has a significant writeup on Hyperliquid "Hyperliquid is the non-custodial antidote to FTX's failure"
Now is a good time to explain certain things about the mechanics of the IPO process that most people don't know. I will explain various dynamics around IPOs that you've probably wondered about (or just felt were odd but ignored). To the financially sophisticated: this post elides certain details and attempts to be simple enough for a lay audience. There's no novel reveal at the end so if you already know how IPOs work, you can skip this post. When a company wants to IPO (sell shares, then have the shares float for public trading - two separate things - hence this explainer), they don't actually just sell them to the public. Rather, they hire bankers to round up a bunch of institutional buyers or wealth investors. We'll call these "big buyers." The company does presentations to these buyers, and then the buyers indicate their willingness to buy - like how much, and at what price - and the bankers mediate this whole process and arrange the transaction. The reason this happens is because when most companies come to the market, no one really knows what price it should start trading at, and it's largely an unknown entity (to the public investors), so you need experienced bankers who understand business and equity markets to figure it out and get it approximately correct. This is the actual function of the bankers who "take companies public" and they are called underwriters. The way it works is this: The bankers go to the big buyers (often investors who already have a lot of business with the bank) and ask them to participate in this process - the one I described above. Buying the shares is risky, so the big buyers need an incentive. This is where the "first day pop" comes from. Because the bankers have the most information of any party at this stage, they are the most likely to be able to guess at the likely "real" market trading price of the stock. So they price the stock a little bit under so that when the actual offering to the public happens on opening day, the stock "pops" by about 10% - 20%. This allows the big buyers to make an instant profit flipping the stock, compensating them for taking the risk of buying an "unknown" stock with no trading history. Let me summarize: - The company sells its shares in a negotiated sale to big buyers. - The company receives cash for those shares. - Now the company is done. - The next day, the big buyers sell their shares on the open market at whatever price public buyers are willing to pay. There are, typically, rules around flipping the shares but obviously not for everyone, not for all the shares, and some big buyers just break the rule (and may not be invited to future IPOs). But obviously the shares that the public actually buys comes from somewhere, and it's these big buyers who bought them from the company in the banker-negotiated sale. They do not come directly from the company. At no point does any member of the "retail" investor public actually give money to the company itself in return for any shares. It all goes through the banker-mediated sale process (called a "road show") where big buyers get a discount for taking the risk, and make their profits on the first-day flip to the buying public. (The bankers also make a huge fee for doing this) That seems kind of like "rich people enriching other rich people" but it's only partially that. Only a small percentage of IPOs do really well. Many of them stink, or fail on the first day with no pop. So if you're a big buyer who participates in a lot of IPOs, you are taking on a real risk. If all goes well, there is a modest 10-20% pop on the first day, and the IPO is deemed a success from the standpoint of the financial industry, and in particular, the bankers who arranged it. Here are two major ways it can go wrong: If the bankers misjudge where the public price will end up and price it too low, the pop will be HUGE. The common reaction to this is "Wow, what a great IPO!" because most people just get excited when Money-Number-Go-Up. But if the pop settles to something roughly close to its peak - the first-day close is taken as a proxy for what the market considers a fair valuation of the company - it means the company left money on the table: it sold to the big buyers at far too low of a price. All the big buyers and opening-bell first-day retail buyers captured a huge part of that value. Remember that the purpose of an IPO is to raise money for the company's operations and if they just sold a bunch of stock for less than the market was willing to pay, well, that's bad for the company. Another way it can go "wrong" is if it's "priced to perfection" where the negotiated sale is arranged at exactly what the public ends up being willing to pay, and there is no pop. Even "worse," if it's priced above that, and the bankers completely misjudge the price in the wrong direction, the stock will fall on the first day and close below the IPO price. But "wrong" is a matter of perspective: this is bad for the big buyers (who didn't make money on flipping the IPO), bad for the first-day retail buyers who now own a plunging stock, and bad for the bankers, who lose credibility. But it is the best financial outcome for the company itself. The company was able to sell its shares at the maximum price the market would bear, and it walks away with the cash. When an IPO like this happens, the financial headline that dominates is "it's a failed IPO." But in terms of raising money for the company, it's the best-case outcome! This is an instance where the incentives of all the parties involved are not the same. When the bankers price the IPO for a modest pop, that's the default compromise between these interests: the company makes a little bit less than it would get from the public, the big buyers take a risk and get a profitable flip sometimes, and the bankers lend their market expertise and get paid their fees. When it skews in either direction, one or more of those parties takes a hit - but the others benefit. The reason that the "priced to perfection" scenario is often excoriated in the press is because the financial press is largely controlled by the financial industry. It's not a conspiracy, it's just that financial news will mostly ask their network (i.e. finance folks) to give their opinion, and because the finance folks (bankers or big buyers) didn't come out ahead, they think of it as a failure. But it's a Great Success for the company itself! Outlier IPOs: In my life, I've had a front-row seat to two outlier IPOs (Google and Facebook), and two "standard default" IPOs (PayPal and Reddit). I'll talk a bit about the interesting effects in the outliers, and how they compare to the defaults, and then a bit about what could happen with SpaceX. One of the ways the default IPO process can vary is when a company is already very well-known to the public. Most IPO-ing companies are unknown to the public, and that's a big reason why the bankers have to be involved: they form a bridge of trust to the big buyers and bring value in their specialized expertise about market sentiment. But a company that's already very well-known doesn't get as much value from that. Especially if there's already demand for the company's shares, the company can often find enough buyers for its offering. The contract terms (services, fees) for underwriting an IPO are always negotiable, and so certain companies can negotiate lower fees and do things differently. Google did this in 2004. Now, one funny thing that's typically true in a default IPO is that the stock will open between $15 and $25. The reason for this is that most people are not financially sophisticated and if a stock opens at $100, they will think it's too expensive. The real value of the stock is what percentage of the company it represents + the company's financial performance. So the numbers $15 and $25 are chosen because most people will think that's a reasonable price to buy - they compare it to buying something at the store. No joke. Now, because companies and their existing stock can have a large range of values, what they do prior to the offering is simply do a stock split (or reverse stock split) so that the effective per-share price falls into that range. It's entirely just optics because most people don't understand math and finance. In 2004, Google IPO'd at $85/share. If you are thinking "omg, that's a lot!" then you are one of the people I just described. It doesn't matter that it was $85/share. Google, because it was well-known and there was a lot of demand for its stock, did not have the underwriting bankers negotiate their sales to the big buyers! Because they had a lot of internal expertise (and preference for) fancy auction mechanics as a price discovery mechanism, they set up a "Dutch auction" for their shares. Briefly, the Dutch auction is an auction format that is considered better at reaching the real market value of whatever's being sold (compared to a regular auction, which seeks to maximize the buying price). They ran this Dutch auction and asked everyone who wanted to invest to submit their bids and amounts, and then assigned a price and (modulo some regulatory details) opened at $85/share. This was the first time in tech for an "unusual" IPO. It was met with positive regard because Google didn't have to pay the bankers as much money, probably got a fairer price for its shares, and the buying public got in at a reasonable price, cutting out a lot of middlemen (e.g. big buyers, though they sold to the big buyers too). And Google was known for innovation and being quirky, so this fit their brand. Today, by the way, the split-adjusted price for that offering is about $2/share. Facebook also had an unusual IPO process. Facebook engaged the underwriters from a position of absurd negotiating superiority. They were already globally known, and was probably the company most well-known at IPO (in terms of name recognition) in history. Typical banker fees for underwriting can be ~4%. Facebook reportedly negotiated an underwriting fee of 1%. Why? Because there was massive demand for its shares, and everyone already knew what Facebook was about. So who cares about the bankers? Not only that, but Facebook priced itself to perfection. It opened at $38/share, and closed at $38.23/share, implying that Facebook had exactly hit the market price and gotten the maximum amount of money, with nearly no spread between what Facebook sold for and what the public ended up paying for it. Further, over the next few months, its stock trended downwards. This caused no end of hand-wringing from people who bought on first-offering, but it implies even more strongly that Facebook got top dollar for selling its shares. (Anyone who held on for longer 16 months after that saw huge gains - today the price is at ~$590) The financial press absolutely excoriated the Facebook IPO, calling it a huge failure. This drove the mainstream conversation about it, which also depicted it as a failure, highlighting stories of investors like an old lady who'd put her life savings into the IPO (.... which you are never supposed to do). The bad press went on for months. At the same time, Facebook execs and informed insiders quietly understood that it had been a perfectly-executed IPO, in terms of raising money for the company. And, if people like the old lady held on to her stock for a couple years, she still made mad bank. Those were the outliers. Now the regular ones: One of the features of an IPO is that typically most shareholders are subject to what is called a "lockup." The default lockup is often for 6 months, but the terms can be negotiated. During the lockup, shareholders cannot sell their shares. To understand this, first realize that "shareholders in the company" are different from the company itself. In an IPO, the company (the corporate entity) issues stock and sells it to investors, taking in cash to fund the company's operations. This is different from shareholders of the company - existing investors, employees, and executives - selling stock. These parties personally own stock (i.e. ownership) in the company and if they sell it the cash goes to them, not the company. The lockup typically applies to some or all of these parties, and the reason is because when the company floats shares in its offering, if on the next day (or month) many large shareholders were to also sell their shares - some of which could be a block of comparable size to the IPO offering itself - it would tank the market. This would reflect very poorly on the company because it would mean that all the investors who bought in the IPO (big buyers, but also people who believed in the company and bought on the first day/week) would see steep declines while "insiders" made off with profits. But the exact configuration of lockups varies, because it's all negotiable. The common default is that most private company shares are locked up for 180 days. Sometimes, the shares floated (sold to the big buyers) for the IPO aren't newly issued shares by the company. Sometimes the major shareholders negotiate to sell some percentage of their holdings - say 10% - and those shares are the ones sold to the big buyers and then later into the regular market. The rest of the shares held by the shareholders may remain subject to the lockup. The negotiation ends up balancing the desire of shareholders (prior investors, executives, employees) for liquidity vs the signaling effect it has on the market - no one wants an IPO to look like insiders dumping on the market. When Reddit went public, the underwriting situation was pretty vanilla (road show, sell to big buyers, modest pop on first day). The shares offered for sale at the Reddit IPO weren't all issued by the company, a significant component were employee shares. Many employees had been at the company for a long time, so a program was set up whereby the employees could elect to sell some percentage of their vested holdings, and these were some of the shares offered to the big buyers. All of the large existing shareholders - the venture capitalists and mutual funds that had already bought into Reddit at far below the IPO price - didn't sell a single share in the IPO. (Subsequent market performance seems to have borne out the financial wisdom of that decision) One thing to understand here then is the divergent effects on the company vs existing shareholders. If the company is "priced to perfection" and subsequently the stock price falls, and existing shareholders did not participate in the IPO sale itself, they are in the same boat as retail investors: the stock value is dropping. Further, if they're subject to a lockup, they have no way to exit the stock for a long time. ==== Now that we have all that background, we can talk about the SpaceX IPO: SpaceX is an outlier, if for no other reason than the fact that size of the offering is the largest in history. When outliers happen, rules often get broken. Not because of corruption (though sometimes it's that), but because an outlier will often create conditions that are outside the anticipated range of what the existing rules were set up to handle. The first thing is that SpaceX is one of those "already really well-known" companies and one with a lot of pent-up demand for its stock. In the last few years, SpaceX funding rounds have been massively oversubscribed. This means that SpaceX is in a position to not only negotiate the sorts of terms that Facebook got with its underwriters (very low fees), but it has negotiating power on key terms like pricing, sizing, and lockup periods. Remember that in terms of "cash raised" in the IPO, the amount the company raises is simply the amount they sell to the big buyers for, NOT how much the stock trades up (or down) once the markets open. Elon's stated intention is that the IPO is necessary to raise the huge amount of funds needed to complete Starship and fund a mission to Mars. People can quibble about whether that's his main motivation or if he's just grifter unloading on the retail market, but it's a very telling point that his actual compensation package involves actual Mars-based metrics like establishing a colony with a million people on it. If he's a grifter, and he basically controls his board, he there'd be no need for a comp package like that. So if the goal of the IPO is not to cash out for insiders, but actually "raise a huge amount of money for the company to carry out its insanely ambitious goals," there would be a strong incentive to "price to perfection," i.e. push the bankers to price the stock at what they think the market really will bear, and reduce the profit the big buyers would make on the first-day pop. And if any hiccup occurs, the stock could tumble, much like what happened with the Facebook IPO - but SpaceX itself would have the cash it needs. Based on what I've explained much earlier, you can now also see that if the stock being floated in the IPO is newly-issued by the company and none of the existing shareholders are allowed to sell into the IPO, and the IPO is "priced to perfection," it's less likely that it's a dump on retail investors, because the stock will tumble before any of the major shareholders can sell. The company as an entity makes cash, but its shareholders share the fate of the market (actually slightly worse because of the lockup's effects on their liquidity). On the other hand, having learned from that, SpaceX might not want a year of bad press, with the entire financial press discussing how bad an investment SpaceX is. Elon and SpaceX already have to fight a culture war and lots of people demonize them. So there's a chance the pricing has been set up to be something like the default - a modest pop on the first day. The question is basically whether the company wants to optimize for cash or public perception - compelling arguments for both could be made. Having said all that, people are probably underestimating the degree of retail investor interest. The allure and romance of space flight, the exploration of space - all of those are long-held dreams that are older than Google or Facebook or even the internet itself. Mankind has dreamt of walking among the stars for decades. Although the smart money makes decisions on the basis of P/E ratios and the like, a regular Joe with a Robinhood account who has dreamed of space and remembers the magnificence of seeing twin rocket boosters landing side-by-side will probably want to grab a few shares if he can. A LOT of people probably feel this way, and not many of them will be able to get IPO allocation. Thus, it's possible that no matter where the offering price is set, there will be an absolutely insane, possibly record-setting pop on the first day. SpaceX is not just a selling Starlink, or compute or whatever you think - SpaceX is selling dreams. And it has been steadily making them real. Incidentally, if this happens, after the euphoria wears off, the stock will probably tumble, providing lots of fodder for negative news coverage. SpaceX's lockup policy is also unusual. Instead of either allowing some shareholders to sell immediately, or locking everyone up for 180 days, there is a staged and gradual unlock over the span of the 180 days, with a fraction of one's holdings allowed to be sold. One of the stages even requires that the stock price be over some threshold, presumably to hold the stock price in a certain range of values. It's unclear how this staged unlocking will affect price dynamics; it feels like an engineer's solution to trying to manage market volatility. (My suspicion is that the magnitude of public sentiment - both positive and negative - will drive more of the volatility than any pricing or lockup schedule) Well, now you know everything I know about IPOs. If I were to guess at outcomes, my probability distribution is: 70% likely to see a huge first-day pop (sustained for at least a week), and 30% likely that it's priced to perfection and closes below its IPO price. This situation is such an outlier and all of the conditions necessary for any of those things to happen are in play, and it's not clear which forces will dominate. Either way, good luck! 🚀
they're offering spacex ipo at the grocery store checkout
hunter is the coolest of all the first children of my lifetime.
rektdiomedes @rektdiomedes
106K Followers 6K Following Crypto, macro, thumos. Publisher @thedailydegenhq. Evangelist for Mapledom @maplefinance. Paladin @protocol_fx. Proud Mantleian. Threads in Highlights tab.
smolting (wassie, ver... @inversebrah
517K Followers 6K Following professional it/that and lil/shid @wassie NOT A FROK D: mite be a multiagency fed (unproven) check out https://t.co/kq0S9R3nRZ
CL @CL207
276K Followers 11K Following ex trading desk @ hokkaido ginko user @googlemaps mid and small cap asset mentions in reply = blocked no check dm, no telegram, no ai or nsfw fan art ❌
The DeFi Investor �... @TheDeFinvestor
164K Followers 3K Following Crypto Analyst. Sharing DeFi updates and crypto strategies. Subscribe to my blog to stay on top of trends: https://t.co/qrKYXe3Uxo
hoeem @hooeem
169K Followers 2K Following helping you turn screen time into cash flow using modern stacks to create digital leverage.
blocmates. @blocmates
86K Followers 11K Following Dynamic new media for frontier tech. The blocmates podcast: live every Wednesday, 10am est.
Crypto Andrii @Crypt0_Andrii
25K Followers 4K Following Full-time crypto degen 💯 Follow me for alpha 👀 FREE TG channel - https://t.co/cbsGEK5SPA
VIKTOR @thedefivillain
61K Followers 2K Following I write a free weekly newsletter covering the latest crypto narratives : https://t.co/GDiah6MkSW Link of my TG channel below
Ouroboros Capital / y... @OuroborosCap8
30K Followers 2K Following DeFi yield fund / building @YuzuMoneyX
The Daily Degen @thedailydegenhq
43K Followers 3K Following By @rektdiomedes. Daily breakdown of all crypto news/data/alfa!
cOmpute | OFFICIAL TE... @CorkeryP58182
75 Followers 604 Following Uncensored, private, decentralized Al inference network. CA: EmcxFTNVDqyLHp11NvwvLZ4D7LKGbG917B8RF7dwpump
LostralianTrades @LostralianTrade
887 Followers 7K Following CitadelLounge | CEO @GanntecApp | Angel investor | 7Y futures trading
Royal Al1d ¤ @royal1dd
405 Followers 493 Following just a loyal royal | @FraxForce Member | @Scale_Farm Contributor | building @BlupillOnBase
Aitbot @Aitbot_ai
339 Followers 80 Following ⚡ Hyperliquid analytics | 📊 Trader rankings | 🔁 Copy winners | 🎯 Fade losers | Non-custodial risk control ↓
Postys @_PostyXB_T
602 Followers 7K Following Crypto Since 2018 | Running @RealBasementDAO l Advisor @GolfNApp
zkTuring.hl @zkTuring
5K Followers 1K Following This is my journey from broke student to billionaire fool, one Hyperliquid at a time. Follow my retweets to stay up to date on Hyperliquid things.
Kieu.eth @kieu20011
18K Followers 14K Following Crypto Creator NFT • Web3 • Alpha 📩 Telegram: https://t.co/9C1yF52iDt
ampersand @amprsnd1
367 Followers 1K Following Building intelligence platform for relocation decisions at @resettleio
Peter Peterson @ppeter8878
15 Followers 71 Following Investor | Nodspace Supporting bold entrepreneurs shaping humanity’s future in space and deep tech.
Edrin Valecrest @EdrinValecrest
24K Followers 2K Following With Jah all things are possible. Helping Web3 projects grow, connect, and scale. Community • Content Strategy • Ecosystem Building • Open For Collaboration.
drinkplentyofwater @soda_enjoyer_
8 Followers 271 Following
NCD @Jokerbernrin
20K Followers 6K Following Content Creator | Web3 | AI | DM for Marketing 💌TG : https://t.co/gEJkJmtFF4
Mia @Mia1430271
217 Followers 3K Following 🚨 Most people buy AFTER listing… We enter BEFORE 🚀 💎 Crypto signals (2 per week) 📈 1000%+ potential 🆓 100% FREE access ⚡ Not for everyone 👇 Join now
Trout @BigTrout300
9K Followers 1K Following Very Mysterious, Knowledgable Account Code "BigTrout300" HL Discount A Friendly / Fun Space For All. TG: @BigTrout300 $BigTrout (for fun for the community)
Sonarbot @0xsonarbot
513 Followers 470 Following Launching on @base? Submit your project and gain your first users 0xE1231f809124e4Aa556cD9d8c28CB33f02c75b07
Whitelist Media @Whitelist1Media
30K Followers 1K Following Leading CIS Crypto Media & Community. Web3 insights from Telegram to X Marketing Arm: @Whitelist1Agncy
Gnaneshwari Kamaram @Gnaneshwar51612
1 Followers 37 Following
XUjianxi @ujianxi76670
51 Followers 1K Following
Shtihmas (❖,❖) @Shtihmas11
11K Followers 11K Following The Oldest Creator in crypto! Ambassador @tradehotstuff More: https://t.co/CIs8Fh3yMz
Erionna Haman @ErionnaHaman
60 Followers 1K Following Binance's NFT universe: where creativity meets the blockchain. #NFTUniverse #BinanceCreativity
Cole @LegendaryLibr
5K Followers 2K Following Bitcoin/ gen ai/ code/Vague poster Signal: Legendarylibr.95 https://t.co/JDusqPLIj0
darkfire @darkfiresss
1K Followers 790 Following mod @hotdao_, sharing thoughts, vibe coder, locked in crypto
Morgan Lai @morganlai
3K Followers 5K Following building @arespro @ Formulate Ventures @alliancedao @Stanford @MIT
0xApart @0xApart
129 Followers 630 Following
FanForce @myfanforce
16K Followers 877 Following Step into the Spotlight | Connecting awesome projects with authentic creators and super fans
Hooctir @Hooctir3674022
41 Followers 2K Following My smile is the spark that ignites everything in its path
Tree @Tree_of_Alpha
246K Followers 135 Following semi-retarded trader building @TreeNewsFeed buying @TreeNewsToken
0xngmi @0xngmi
193K Followers 325 Following Building a transparent defi dashboard at @defillama. Would rather be right than make money
찌 G 跻 じ MBA, CF... @DegenSpartan
273K Followers 4K Following Former Degenerate Spartan Private Crypto Fund Manager Quoted in CoinDesk & Cointelegraph Psyops Special Forces Reformed Hentai Addict Reinstated @egirl_capital
Edgy - The DeFi Edge ... @thedefiedge
301K Followers 208 Following I help busy people cut through the noise in DeFi. Systems driven research without the hype or bs. Partner @Stacks
rektdiomedes @rektdiomedes
106K Followers 6K Following Crypto, macro, thumos. Publisher @thedailydegenhq. Evangelist for Mapledom @maplefinance. Paladin @protocol_fx. Proud Mantleian. Threads in Highlights tab.
smolting (wassie, ver... @inversebrah
517K Followers 6K Following professional it/that and lil/shid @wassie NOT A FROK D: mite be a multiagency fed (unproven) check out https://t.co/kq0S9R3nRZ
CL @CL207
276K Followers 11K Following ex trading desk @ hokkaido ginko user @googlemaps mid and small cap asset mentions in reply = blocked no check dm, no telegram, no ai or nsfw fan art ❌
The DeFi Investor �... @TheDeFinvestor
164K Followers 3K Following Crypto Analyst. Sharing DeFi updates and crypto strategies. Subscribe to my blog to stay on top of trends: https://t.co/qrKYXe3Uxo
CryptoCondom @crypto_condom
155K Followers 2K Following
Patrick Scott @patfscott
97K Followers 2K Following Revenue & Growth @DefiLlama | amateur Malinois trainer | 60K on YouTube https://t.co/5KvtvWVCN9
Arthur Hayes @CryptoHayes
804K Followers 29 Following Arthur Hayes, Co-Founder of BitMEX & CIO @Maelstromfund
Adam Cochran (adamsco... @adamscochran
302K Followers 2K Following professor, policy consultant, independent journalist and father. Trying to make the world suck less. Follow for the latest in politics, economics and law.
Ignas | DeFi @DefiIgnas
162K Followers 2K Following Subscribe to my DeFi blog to get ahead of the curve 👉 https://t.co/7O0WAdXUnT Co-founder of @PinkBrains_io DeFi Creator Studio
hoeem @hooeem
169K Followers 2K Following helping you turn screen time into cash flow using modern stacks to create digital leverage.
Truee @TrueeConnector
36K Followers 120 Following Venture Incubation & Capital Strategy. Scaling 15+ Portcos across Web3 Infrastructure, RWA & SME's. Curating equity for Founders & Investors.
Cassie Pritchard @hecubian_devil
49K Followers 2K Following sign the No Contract, No Coffee pledge here to support union Starbucks workers: https://t.co/PCxKfazvSJ
Noel Smith @NoelSmith
15K Followers 2K Following Institutional Investor, Market-Maker/Floor Trader, 20+ years. Founder of Chicago Options Market-Making, Prop and HFT firms at the CBOE & CME | Board Member
SEAL 911 @SEAL_911
4K Followers 16 Following A @_SEAL_Org initiative. Contact the SEAL 911 team: https://t.co/uOIGCrTOYt
c0mpute @c0mputeAI
5K Followers 3 Following Uncensored, private, decentralized AI inference network. CA: EmcxFTNVDqyLHp11NvwvLZ4D7LKGbG9i7B8RF7dwpump
celestineia @celestineia
13K Followers 1K Following logic will break your heart ☆ algorithms and machines of loving grace ~ towards enlightenment
Royal Al1d ¤ @royal1dd
405 Followers 493 Following just a loyal royal | @FraxForce Member | @Scale_Farm Contributor | building @BlupillOnBase
MNX @MNX_fi
2K Followers 23 Following The AI exchange. Trade Anthropic, memory stocks, & H100 prices.
Matt Casto @mcasto_
5K Followers 458 Following Liquid asset strategies @CMT_Digital | Prev @Vanguard_Group | Tweets ≠ advice
Aryan @Aryonchain
2K Followers 4K Following - VC & Research @CMT_Digital - Prev: @BlockchainRI, @Columbia Econ-Math. Views are my own, not investment advice.
Posty @PostyXBT
103K Followers 493 Following Crypto & Stocks | Building @playfcl_io | Advisor @GolfNApp
Yishan @yishan
106K Followers 535 Following I run Terraformation, and I was once the CEO of Reddit. Both are very interesting challenges. AMA in a subscriber-only newsletter! https://t.co/zA2F2S7etG
Michael Saylor @saylor
5.1M Followers 818 Following Bitcoin is https://t.co/KbbYe74DgB | $BTC Hodler | @Strategy Founder & Chairman | bio https://t.co/9Zlq0oHYnP | free education https://t.co/4L1s0ix7FE | $MSTR $STRC
Flying Dutchman @DeadSeaTrader
13K Followers 436 Following 47W–7L since Feb 1st (perps) 😈 More W’s than L’s. Always. Swing longed $HYPE at 21.38 → ATH play called early
OddStats @OddStats
85K Followers 124 Following Retired finance professional. I can't see the future and neither can you; anyone who says different has something to sell. NOTHING I SAY IS INVESTMENT ADVICE.
A.J. Button @AJButton2
9K Followers 716 Following Financial writer/journalist. Looking for value names in Chinese tech & AI. Follow for my latest investment ideas. https://t.co/uBk1Eap0Lq
SixSigmaCapital @SixSigmaCapital
54K Followers 756 Following Stock Market Participant | Emergency Doctor Live portfolio updates, actionable ideas and market memos posted at https://t.co/3G8H0mf4x1
OptimusDelta @OptimusDelta
12K Followers 432 Following If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room. Discord server https://t.co/OSrpTXMiwn Email [email protected]
NCD @Jokerbernrin
20K Followers 6K Following Content Creator | Web3 | AI | DM for Marketing 💌TG : https://t.co/gEJkJmtFF4
Derek Edws @derekedws
19K Followers 2K Following managing partner @collab_currency / co-founder @glitchmarfa
CookBook @CookBookSauce
5K Followers 6 Following One-stop shop for weekly Crypto market signals w/ @Tradermagus @DocXBT @btc_charlie @Stoiiic & @TraderMercury
PowerGacha @powergacha_sol
861 Followers 23 Following Hold $GACHA. Win the slabs. CA: DnnmrZnCTqQn7bYbVAiWdJLreqrhg7HaSTkmhtzu8THy
Capital Flows @Globalflows
183K Followers 3K Following Christian | Capital Flows Research maps the macro regime across rates, FX & equities to find home run trades | Streaming live every weekday at 11:30am MST
Jack Raines @Jack_Raines
73K Followers 3K Following Wrote a book about status games, opportunity costs and the stage-specificity of life. Pre-order your copy here: https://t.co/gvhMr8mxPL
Kunal Doshi @Kunallegendd
1K Followers 2K Following Research @blockworksres | prev @thespartangroup | Views are my own
Cocoahomology @cocoahomology
4K Followers 2K Following checking the chain @OseroHQ, checking the chain @stablewatchHQ
flow @flowtrades_
125 Followers 142 Following Vision looks like delusion until time catches up Sharing my ideas surrounding my biggest convictions
crypto - popseye (pap... @crypto_popseye
18K Followers 1K Following Gem-hunter 💎 | don’t read dms journal of trades won’t read replies TG: Crypto_popseye Popeyes_z
Usopp @Usoppu
46K Followers 6K Following 🇸🇬 entrepreneur | founder | investor | full time trader since 2017 | unc married to an amazing wife | dad to a baby girl
Bussin Science Invest... @BussinBiotech
5K Followers 365 Following On the lookout for investments with exceptional risk/reward.
MP @MoneyPrinter0x
24K Followers 1K Following joshua 1:9 | building the next big thing in equity perps & onchain options. HIGHERLIQUID private access invites available via request! nfa dyor
Lone Stock Trader @LoneStockTrader
87K Followers 18 Following 16Y full-time trader, US stocks - Focused on R-multiples and staying in tune with the market 🧠🧘🏻♂️ - Context & Environment are Everything.



























































