SaraGD @EnMantis

@DanJDavi It is also sexual abuse

@joquji5n324il @jeffcampbell64 @MeghanEMurphy I cannot see the future. Divorce exists. And this is not the point, many men here are openly saying that a married woman has obligation to give her husband sex or else

Radfems, puedo pediros un favor? Podéis responderme aquí 👇🏽con noticias recientes de agresiones sexuales perpetradas por menores de 16 años? Gracias!

@Brien_Jackson Yeah, no one wants to hear it because it is desperating and scaring how many men think that marriage equals sexual slavery for women and many men happily sexually abuse their partners because they consider by marrying the bought her and have a right to access her anytime

Hay una conspiración para hacer creer al mundo que Bud Bunny es un poeta rebelde y puede que hasta feminista. Este es el nivel de imbecilidad que los medios asumen a la ciudadanía.

@eldiarioes @RequenaAguilar Bad Bunny for president. Un icono anti-Trump, desafiador de los géneros y/o sexos, decolonial, y compositor sutil (“le doy por donde hace pipí, por donde hace popo”) pura poesía. Qué sublime poeta!!!

@juana_gallego @eldiarioes @RequenaAguilar 😂😂😂

Another woman's job is being threatened over her gender critical views. This time, Agnes Wold in Sweden. Agnes Wold is a much-loved public intellectual in Sweden who is known for her feminism, her level-headed response to the COVID lockdown hysteria (she’s a bacteriologist), and, more recently, for refusing to go along with the transgender dogma that has gripped Swedish bureaucratic, activist, media and political elites. On 20 May, the Swedish parliament approved an amendment to the law that criminalises “psychological violence” and “coercion” relating to “gender identity or gender expression (such as conversion practices)”, among other things. It is widely understood to be Sweden’s version of a conversion therapy ban (a more explicit law is likely if the left coalition gets into power in September). Speaking on a radio programme about the law, Wold told the host that she would take 4 years in prison— the penalty for trying to prevent someone from leaning into their opposite-sex, delusion — before she would allow the gender transition of a grandchild (hard agree). This comment set off major drama, with one famous gay media guy calling her the Swedish equivalent to “old hag” or “old crone”. Specifically, he said “get rid of the old hag. It is unethical of Sveriges Radio to give her access to a microphone,” which is a way of saying she should be fired from her public radio job. Many, many people have called for Agnes Wold to be fired throughout the trans-mania era, and a lot of them seemed to be hoping that this comment would be the final nail in her coffin. But the remarks seem to have the opposite effect. Not only did Swedish people get very offended by this little shithead calling their beloved based radio-granny an old hag, they started to ask questions about the law that she was criticising. And that, boys and girls, is how the omerta on the trans mass derangement got partially lifted in Sweden, and suddenly everyone started to ask: wait, what? Some kids think they’re in the wrong body and you can go to jail for telling them to snap out of it? Yes, dear Swedes, that’s what’s happening. Welcome to the conversation. We’ve been expecting you. As of writing, Wold still has not yet been fired.

Women are waking up. This post is the perfect mirror. A woman finally feels relief because her husband stopped demanding sex she never wanted, and the comment section explodes in outrage calling her the villain for “holding him hostage.” Let’s be brutally honest: what you’re defending is not marriage. It’s contractual sexual access disguised as duty. You’re saying that once a woman marries, her body is no longer hers. She must be available on his schedule, regardless of her desire, her health, her emotional reality, or whether he’s even emotionally present. If she doesn’t comply, he’s justified in resentment, pornography, affairs or public shaming. Meanwhile, if a man emotionally abandons his wife, neglects intimacy, watches porn until he’s half impotent and lazy in bed, the same crowd says she must still “put out” because he pays the bills. Her womb is not a trash receptacle for incoherent masculine energy she has zero desire to transmute. Her body is not a reward for a paycheck. Dr. Laura and every voice like her pushed this lie for decades: “If she won’t give it, he has every right…” Yet the reverse is never tolerated. A woman seeking emotional intimacy outside a dead marriage is immediately branded a whore. The double standard is grotesque. More and more women are done. We are reclaiming our bodily autonomy. We are refusing the programming that says our only value is sexual access in exchange for food and shelter. We are no longer willing to perform desire we do not feel just to keep the peace or the roof. If a man wants enthusiastic sex, he needs to become the kind of man who inspires it emotionally, spiritually, energetically. Not demand it as a marital right while offering crumbs in return. The old contract is dissolving. Women are rising. We remember who we are. And we will not go back. You can all fuck right off with the guilt trips. This era is over.

@jeffcampbell64 @MeghanEMurphy You have implied that the wife must respond and have sex with him as an obligation. No leap here at all.

@jeffcampbell64 @MeghanEMurphy So a woman owes sex to her husband and the husband is entitled to sexually abuse her with impunity?

@White_Crayon_00 @MeghanEMurphy Divorce seems a good solution. Now, not wanting sex is not being abusive. Thinking that women owe sex to men it is abusive.

We don’t ask, “Does she look woman enough?” We ask, “Why is this man in women’s sports, prisons, and single-sex spaces?” Nobody is policing femininity. We’re acknowledging sex. The real question is why we’re being told to deny reality, and why so many people are expected to participate in that denial.

@datadriven_tdoc in certain amounts or that belong but are suppressed do not result in any way in a healthy body. Actually, to claim that having the need of a constant intake of medication for life is the equivalent of health makes little sense.

@datadriven_tdoc Good for you. If you are that old, I am not sure how you managed to get puberty blockers. Regarding your good health, it looks like you have not visit Reddit and the thousand people, who are happy to have the surgeries and who are not, telling about the butcheries doctors have+

@datadriven_tdoc done on them. The simple fact of wearing a binder for a year compromises every single system in the body, from the musculoskeltal to the lynphatic. Orchiectomies or penectomies dońt work well on the urinary tract up tp the kidkeys, hormones that not belong to a body+

This is a great read. Workplace safety also treats prostitutes as half humans not worthy of the same protections ‘at work’ which also indicate it is NOT work. I work with cell cultures and also infectious organisms including chlamydia, gonorrhoea and many more nasties. I cannot come in contact with them at work. Unlike a prostitute, I have to use engineering safety measures and handle these organisms inside a HEPA filtered closed cabinet, with gloves, lab coat tied at the back, safety glasses and lots of disinfectants to decontaminate everything so that I do NOT get these organisms in my mouth, eyes or on skin. A prostitute is expected to have someone else’s body parts (which may also potentially infected) into their mouths, anus or vagina, and body fluids anywhere. How is that workplace safety?? Apparently it has been decided somewhere by someone that prostitutes really want this risk and it is nothing reasonably practical they can do about it, said for condoms. If they really considered it work they would follow these safety principles ⬇️ and the work would be eliminated as not safe. It is clear, people in governments and many of the public does not think prostitutes are worthy of the same protections as a for example a scientist at work. PPE (gloves and condoms) offer the lowest form of protection, and elimination of the hazard is 100% effective. Further more, condoms offer no protections against physical and psychological violence. How can it be legal in Australia and other places??? It is fundamentally unsafe and breaks most workplace safety rules. Prostitution is NOT work. It is paid grape. Nordic model NOW with the aim of elimination long term.

Nordic Model Now! @nordicmodelnow

2 days ago

Prostituting Women: Why the left shouldn't be part of justifying it. This is a great article from @LauraPidcock. “It must be a basic socialist/feminist principle to oppose the commodification of women’s bodies. The idea of the punter handing over money in exchange for doing to

1 62 131 4K 16

El feminismo lucha para cambiar la sociedad. El transgenerismo lucha para cambiar al individuo. No sé si se ve la diferencia.

@datadriven_tdoc @chrislilge "Flourishing" adult for you is someone who has been sterilised, their cognitive development, kidneys and liver function compromised for life, lives with chronic pain in pelvis and urinary incontinence, requires lifelong medication. You mean flourishing doctors and pharma.