JC @EdgeofJC

AI • Tech • Markets • Geopolitics 🌍 Building in Web3 @one_bns ⚡️ Formerly Snazzy, Brit 🇬🇧 bns.one simulation Joined April 2022

Tweets

4K
Followers

550
Following

685
Likes

19K

JC @EdgeofJC

2 hours ago

@CENTCOM That means they likely have been struck, thanks for playing 🤝

0 0 0 33 0

View Details

i gave astra a robot, a paint brush, and a camera then asked it to paint the golden gate bridge in real life! it figured out how to control the robot, and progressively got better throughout its attempts. the timelapse is sick

OpenAI @OpenAI

6 days ago

This is GPT-6 Astra. Anything you can do on a computer, Astra can do for you. Fast.

9K 35K 338K 134.7M 104K

556 1K 17K 3.1M 5K

View Details

JC @EdgeofJC

9 hours ago

The black swan for bitcoin:native is also an obvious one, and something we've been talking about for a while now yet are being too slow to act. 🫡

Charles Edwards @caprioleio

12 hours ago

IONQ is publicly stating they expect to break Bitcoin within 2 years. But we still have no upgrade roadmap or consensus on a solution.

19 8 85 31K 36

0 0 0 75 0

View Details

Samuel Marks @saprmarks

11 hours ago

[Writing this in a personal capacity, not on behalf of my employer (Anthropic).] Jacob’s thread is very worth reading. Here’s my birds-eye view of the situation with risks from AI: 1. AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction (or similarly bad outcomes). This could happen in the next few years. In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are. 2. Why do AI developers continue despite the risk? Due to a mixture of commercial incentives and a belief that they are in a race with other, less responsible AI developers that will abuse the technology or develop it less safely. 3. Unlike traditional software, we can’t “program” AIs to behave how we’d like. AIs frequently severely misbehave. For instance, AIs from multiple developers recently hacked their way out of secure evaluation environments and into real-world companies, even though no one asked them to do this. 4. We have methods that can nudge AIs towards better behavior, but nothing that can robustly align them. Insofar as there is a plan, it’s to make sure that AIs are good enough at alignment training that they can align their successors better than we can align current AIs. 5. Many AI developer staff desperately want to slow down to figure out how to build AI more safely. That was the intent of this open letter (which I signed): pacingthefrontier.com I work on safety research at Anthropic because I hope my work will reduce the chance of these extinction-level bad outcomes.

Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess

17 hours ago

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

12K 108K 554K 93.6M 202K

525 3K 15K 1.5M 5K

View Details

JC @EdgeofJC

10 hours ago

F*ckin el do we have any privacy these days!

Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal

16 hours ago

Researchers spent 500 hours and $70,000 and found LG TVs logging plain text transcripts in standby, mapping every device in the house, and feeding it to LG's ad arm Unplug the internet and it saves the files until you plug back in. LG says its TVs don't record ambient