Dogity Life @DogityLife

thepositiveangle.com Joined May 2020

Tweets

525
Followers

1K
Following

2K
Likes

755

@

a week ago

PNoy will go down in history as the President who was brave enough to take China to court to assert our rights to what is ours. And WIN.

1 699 3K 48K 56

View Details

Dogity Life @DogityLife

2 weeks ago

@bncdotph Hinahapo ang sports minded 🤪

0 0 0 127 0

View Details

ᴘᴜᴛᴀɴɢɪɴᴀ ʏᴜɴɢ sʜᴇɪʟᴀ sɪsᴏɴ. ᴏᴘᴇɴɪɴɢ ᴘᴀ ʟᴀɴɢ ɴɪʏᴀ, ᴘᴀʟᴘᴀᴋ ɴᴀ ᴀɢᴀᴅ. ᴀɴᴏ ɴᴀᴍᴀɴ ᴋᴜɴɢ ᴍᴀs ᴍᴀʟᴀᴋɪ ᴀɴɢ ʙᴏᴛᴏɴɢ ɴᴀᴋᴜʜᴀ ɴɪ ɪɴᴅᴀʏ ᴋᴇsᴀ sᴀ ɴᴀᴋᴀᴜᴘᴏɴɢ ᴘᴀɴɢᴜʟᴏ? ʀᴇʟᴇᴠᴀɴᴛ ᴘᴀ ʙᴀ ʏᴀɴ?! ᴀɴᴏ, ᴘᴏʀᴋᴇ sɪʏᴀ ᴀɴɢ ᴘɪɴᴀᴋᴀᴍᴀᴅᴀᴍɪɴɢ ɴᴀᴋᴜʜᴀɴɢ ʙᴏᴛᴏ ɪʙɪɢ ʙᴀ sᴀʙɪʜɪɴ ɴᴏɴ ʟɪʙʀᴇ ɴᴀ sɪʏᴀ ᴍᴀɢɴᴀᴋᴀᴡ? ʙᴀᴡᴀʟ ɴᴀ ᴋᴡᴇsᴛʏᴜɴɪɴ? ʙᴀᴡᴀʟ ɴᴀ ᴘᴀᴛᴀʟsɪᴋɪɴ? ᴜᴋɪɴɴᴀᴍ ᴋᴇᴛᴅɪ. ᴛᴀʙʙᴇᴅ.

263 487 4K 252K 178

View Details

juanchowaitingfor? @DDS_hater

6 months ago

@RommelFLopez Hindi pa man nababawi ang WPS, may nakuha na agad na puwesto sa Senado ang China. Ang pagtatanggol ni Marcoleta sa karapatan ng China sa ating karagatan ay lantad na pagtataksil sa bayan.

0 1 1 77 0

View Details

Random Poser @rndposer

6 months ago

@RommelFLopez Is it time we ask Marcoleta to resign? Not only is he for China but he is providing legal services for the Discaya. He is not a senator working for the benefit of Filipinos, he’s a traitor.

1 3 65 1K 0

View Details

Mar Calim @CalimMar

6 months ago

@ABSCBNNews And the Remullas' legal action ??? "In the Philippines, bribing a government official is a serious crime, punishable under the Revised Penal Code (Articles 210-212) for direct/indirect bribery and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019), ....."

0 2 17 786 0

View Details

querobin bondoc @qbondoc

6 months ago

@ABSCBNNews Why not reveal their name/s and start prosecuting them?!

0 1 2 162 0

View Details

Taylor @tayloorlin

7 months ago

@KDTrey5 The days gone by

0 1 7 748 0

View Details

Jesus Falcis 🇵🇭 @jesusfalcis

8 months ago

High level Senate tweety bird confirms it was Chiz Escudero who ordered ₱74 Billion Pesos of PhilHealth to be zeroed AND he was the brains behind removing ₱50 Billion from 4Ps of DSWD in 2025. Pag nag salita po etong si tweety bird, lusaw po ang keso! 🧀 #Accountability

138 757 4K 132K 153

View Details

Jane Kim @JaneKim566370

8 months ago

@jesusfalcis hayup na magnanakaw yan! kaya ganon na lang mamigay ng hermes bag asawa nya! pag ang gag*ng to di mapanagot, walang kwentang gubyerno to!

1 3 7 3K 1

View Details

Dogity Life @DogityLife

8 months ago

@leisbeth_recto Pinaka corrupt na pinakamahirap o nagpapahirap sa bayan si garfield de kilay

0 0 1 8 0

View Details

AlTors @cocoy118

9 months ago

@TrillanesSonny Tulad ng sinabi mo noon sentri.. babalikan mo sila kapag wala na kapangyarihan si digong. Ipakulong mo lahat ng mga demonyong duterte pati mga alagad nito. I salute you, Sir!

0 1 28 834 0

View Details

Lynn @manangnanggal

10 months ago

@PhilippineStar Grabe naman ang sacrifice ni Heart para sa bayan. Leche.

8 57 2K 27K 6

View Details

Dogity Life @DogityLife

11 months ago

@Ismail_obaid1 .

0 0 0 3 0

View Details

Kiko Pangilinan @kikopangilinan

12 months ago

JOINT STATEMENT On the Supreme Court’s Ruling Halting the Impeachment Trial of Vice President Sara Duterte July 28, 2025 We respectfully disagree with the Supreme Court’s ruling that halted the Senate’s constitutional duty to try the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. Congress, acting in good faith and following prevailing jurisprudence, followed the law in initiating and transmitting the complaint. To retroactively apply a new definition of what it means to “initiate” an impeachment case—after the fact—can be likened to changing the rules in the middle of the game. It is unfair. Former Supreme Court Justice Adolfo Azcuna, a respected constitutionalist and framer, called it what it is: legally defensible, perhaps, but grossly unfair. We therefore urge the Supreme Court to reconsider and apply two principles it has long upheld: • The Fairness Principle — that retroactive application of new legal interpretations should not harm those who relied in good faith on old ones; and • The Doctrine of Operative Facts — that actions already taken under a prior, valid interpretation should be recognized as legally effective. In doing so, the Court would not be undermining its power of review, but rather giving full effect to all branches of government, consistent with the doctrine established in Civil Liberties Union vs. Executive Secretary—that no constitutional provision should be read in a way that negates another. The powers of the Court, the House of Representatives, and the Senate must all be given proper and balanced effect. We did not swear an oath only to protect positions by way of technicalities. We swore to protect the Constitution—and the right of every Filipino to demand truth and justice. If we allow this precedent to stand, we risk silencing the very process meant to keep power in check. We call on our fellow citizens, on every institution that still believes in accountability, and on the Supreme Court itself: harmonize the seemingly conflicting provisions of the Constitution on Judicial review and the exclusive powers of Congress. — Sen. Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan — Sen. Risa Hontiveros — Sen. Bam Aquino

69 396 2K 97K 38

View Details

Rommel Lopez @RommelFLopez

a year ago

Agree ba kayo na kailangan ng lifestyle check at isapubliko ni Isko Moreno ang SALN nya?

171 370 4K 86K 20

View Details

The King @arthurXadvocate

2 years ago

If Vice President Sara Duterte refuses to abide by the rule of law and shows no trust in the institutions of our government, then the honourable course of action is for her to vacate her position. Her actions epitomise what a public servant—and much more, a Vice President of the Republic—should never be. She is a glaring example of failed leadership and dereliction of duty.

37 66 307 24K 6

View Details

TagamasidNgBayan @MadelVilla3054

2 years ago

According to Ex. COA Heidi Mendoza.

27 296 1K 97K 109

View Details

Ramon Aguilos @Ramstep

2 years ago

@newswatchplusph I find this a misstep for the president. He should let the law run its course, and if there are lawmakers who'll file an impeachment complaint, he should let them. Why urge them not to?