The pro-Ukraine side is simultaneously arguing: (1) we had nothing to do with it, but (2) “Putin got a little taste of the war.” In other words, the terrorist attack was an act of war. This belies their denials.
@DavidSacks So you're on the pro-murderous autocrat side?
@DavidSacks He's talking about Belgorod. The pro-Russia, self-hate, blame it all on us — side are simultaneously arguing: (1) It's all our fault (2) Expansionists just want to negotiate not expand.
@DavidSacks You’ve really lost the script with this one
@DavidSacks We should mourn every innocent life lost, always @GerberKawasaki . We should all strive for better.
@DavidSacks The West, through its Ukraine proxy, is trying to bait Russia into a rapid escalation of the conflict. The current systematic but slow Russian advance on the combat line of contact is not providing a strong enough narrative opportunity to justify increased NATO involvement.
@DavidSacks Terrorist attacks should never be allowed in warfare. Innocents should never be targeted. Why Ukraine would ever want to be compared to Hamas in this regard is beyond me.
@DavidSacks Ross doesn’t speak for the “pro-Unkranian” side. Ross makes absolutely no sense about almost anything. Don’t use Gerber as example, it cheapens your arguments when using such weak opposition to your points of view.
@DavidSacks Why are you so hard for Putin? I remember America standing up to Russia. Why so many sympathizers? Putin invaded. Putin moved on Ukraine. That’s the cold hard fact. •
@DavidSacks It’s crazy that people are celebrating terrorism now…
@DavidSacks Ross is hardly a speaker for the pro Ukraine side... Nice cherry picking though