@alangnixon @ejwwest @BatcaveSlimer @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @ProphetSholto @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU All it takes is one person, who happens to be right, to destroy consensus. To wit: Copernicus Kepler Pasteur Einstein etc
@IsaacCline42 @ejwwest @BatcaveSlimer @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @ProphetSholto @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU Yep. We are still waiting for them in climate science. Just like evolution and gravity, the evidence is so solid and broad it would be extraordinary if it were overturned.
@alangnixon @IsaacCline42 @ejwwest @BatcaveSlimer @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU No it’s not. It’s on the shakiest of ground, AGW is a computer model theory. Nothing more. Even when proxy tree ring data is taken today it doesn’t match the current temperatures. M.Mann used three pine trees to come up with his ‘hockey stick’ data…..three!
@ProphetSholto @IsaacCline42 @ejwwest @BatcaveSlimer @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU 1: False. 2: False. 3: False, there is an extraordinary amount of real world data from many disciplines, not just climate science. 4: What does that mean? 5: Even if true, over 60 proxy studies have confirmed the 'hockeystick'. gist.github.com/priscian/5a10f…
@alangnixon @ProphetSholto @ejwwest @BatcaveSlimer @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU 1. WRONG! 2. WRONG! 3. WRONG! 4. Your inability to understand an argument is not an argument against it. 5. Total bullshit! You just parrot whatever you read on unskeptical pseudoscience.
@BatcaveSlimer @IsaacCline42 @alangnixon @ejwwest @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU Neither are peer reviewed papers anymore. That’s the point. There is so much bias, the lies are published as facts, camouflaged by the ‘peer review’ smoke screen. Scientists who are sceptical do not get to review most of the crap coming from the institutions anymore.
@ProphetSholto @BatcaveSlimer @IsaacCline42 @alangnixon @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU The DAILY profits of oil companies could fund every climate scientist in the world for a year. If the science is a hoax, they could easily afford to fund science and scientists to demonstrate that. Yet they haven’t. And won’t. In fact they agree with the science. Why?
@ProphetSholto @BatcaveSlimer @IsaacCline42 @alangnixon @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU Scientific journals jealously guard their prestige. They have no incentive to publish bad science, let alone corrupt science. Have you any evidence they have been coerced into publishing anything for this alleged conspiracy?
@ProphetSholto @BatcaveSlimer @IsaacCline42 @alangnixon @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @DanCady @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU But I can’t tell what you’re arguing. Are you claiming there’s a conspiracy that generations of scientists have colluded in? Or are they incompetent? Or are they subject to Groupthink? You need to decide which because it can’t be all three.
@ejwwest @ProphetSholto @BatcaveSlimer @IsaacCline42 @alangnixon @agentsinaction @Ceist8 @tezisold @25_cycle @OceanadeSilva @_InThisTogether @hairymarx1 @HmGinYYC @msdwrites @JohnMashey @dimeinurear @thomasdenmark @theAGU Spreading doubt doesn't necessitate rationality, coherence, or intelligence.