this is the woman who briefly led the government's censorship department before biden backed down and dissolved it. i've been a disinformation researcher for years, and have followed her work closely. nina is a propagandist. shame on the nyt for giving her a platform.
@micsolana What peer reviewed works have you published? What is your training in? Where did you get your PhD?
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana Who is a better disinformation expert: a person who has studied “disinformation” and received a degree but repeatedly been wrong on matters of factual public knowledge or a guy with no degree with a public record that can be validated as accurate in the same period?
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana Hilarious coming from someone not even posting under their name
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana Where did you put your real name?
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana You and your ilk would demand a white paper or an RCS if all he asserted was, “Shit often stinks.” You don’t need to be a mechanic to know your car needs repairs. You don’t need to be a meteorologist to know it’s sunny. You don’t need to be a physicist to know a car is speeding.
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana Peer reviews are not hypothesis driven, thus not scientific
@CommissarTwitch @micsolana @ggreenwald once said “disinformation research expert” (paraphrase) is a made up expertise in a quest to censor. And I agree with Glenn’s position. Also, in the US, “disinformation” is legally protected speech. So it’s weird people get PHDs in ‘detecting legal speech online.’