Robin Jansson @Ch_RobinJan

@GabrielKulen 20k i böter och 200h samhällstjänst är vad det borde kosta. I vissa fall bör hela skolpengen betalas tillbaka

@OlofFlodin Hur kvanitifierar du väljarnas utbildningsnivå? Vad innebär bästa skolan? Vilka är vi?

@dadgostarnooshi @susannasilfver Varför ljuger alla politiker?

@Vivek4real_ Just what someone predicated yesterday?

@RealDarlanio och hur många % är kriminella? fråga dem på 100%

@BarrioElfva Jag tror vi har för många akademiker

@BureaAngerman Det är så märkligt att vi inte kan få äga vår egen digital identitet

So-called age verification for social media is spreading across the world, framed as an effort to create a safer internet for children. In reality, age verification lays the foundation for a fully controlled internet. The age verification rush must be slowed down, and politicians need to recognize the consequences of different types of legislation and systems. Age verification is the wrong approach to fix “the social media problem” The big tech social media companies are bad. Their business model is bad; it is based on mass surveillance and manipulation, and they cooperate with governments in mapping entire populations. But age verification is fundamentally the wrong approach to preventing children from using big tech social media platforms. Introducing age verification is based on coercion; the state forces social media companies to verify their users’ identities. But the big tech social media platforms already know which of their users are children. Their business model depends on knowing this. They know how old users are, and they know exactly what type of person they are. As age verification is based on coercion, politicians could instead force platforms to stop doing the things politicians consider harmful to children, or force them to block children (again, they know who they are) from using their services. But instead, politicians seek to massively invade everyone’s privacy and undermine democratic rights on a global scale. In other words, the latter is the real objective – they do not want to protect children; they want to impose control. Slippery slope of age verification It is undeniable that age verification threatens freedom of expression, risks increasing mass surveillance, and is likely to lead to censorship. It will not only shrink the online world and reduce young people’s right to privacy (for example, if VPN services were to be restricted); but also risks becoming a significant step toward a controlled internet for everyone. Most age verification is identity verification Most countries are now considering introducing age verification systems, meaning that everyone would have to identify themselves either to the service/website they want to use or to a third party capable of linking them to their activity on that service or website. This is not age verification but identity verification, and the consequence is therefore that freedom of information is restricted (you can no longer visit regulated websites anonymously) and that you can no longer post anonymously on social media. This is a major problem in countries like the UK and Germany where the police conduct raids on people’s homes for posting content on social media that the authorities dislike. Or in the United States, where authorities are trying to pressure tech companies into revealing the identities behind accounts protesting ICE. Social media identity verification removes important tools for activists in countries where criticizing those in power is dangerous. Restrictions on app store or operating system level Some countries are looking to impose identity verification at the app store level or even within the operating system itself. This is an exciting experiment, since this is possible to circumvent using open-source operating systems. Some countries are already looking to include open-source systems. Since open-source systems cannot be controlled, politicians would ultimately need to ban devices that are not controlled by the state. The end point: telescreens like those in Orwell’s 1984, devices that both monitor you and broadcast only the information approved by the state. The Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) alternative and the EU The EU has presented its own age verification app as “completely anonymous”. The idea is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is currently designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time. Read more on our site. mullvad.net/blog/age-verif…

The EU age verification app is presented as “completely anonymous”. But the risk is that member states (the countries are supposed to create their own versions of the open-source EU app) use it to introduce identity verification that makes it impossible to post anonymously on social media. The idea behind “completely anonymous” is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time. This means that the EU could decide at any time that ZKP may no longer be used, and in one stroke the app would fall back to its default mode, meaning that every post on social media carries an ID tag. By that point, an infrastructure will already have been rolled out; people will have gotten used to it, and it will be harder to roll it back. More details on mullvad.net/blog/age-verif…

@SwedishPM Hur ser utredningen ut?

@gustavkassel Jag tror han har blockerat mig också. Fjantar blockerar folk, herrar talar med folk Gustav. Du vet ju vilken sida du valt

@anderslindberg Såklart han gör men du borde kritisera honom för att ge bort pengar till Ukraina och inte när han väl gör det till Svenskarna. Globalister är ni ju båda två bara olika sidor av samma mynt

@Olle_Thorell Fast S är ingen ny riktning. Kolla in AFS deras politik verkar vara i en ny riktning

@Moska12H När missade du senast en måltid?

APPLE JUST GOT HUMILIATED BY AN $8 JACKET BADGE A random Japanese maker saw Apple's $3,499 Vision Pro Persona and decided to build the same thing for the price of a pizza. Same real-time face mirroring. Same natural expressions and blinks. Same low latency reaction when you smile. Apple needed a full headset with M2 chip, R1 processor, 12 cameras and LiDAR. He did it with one ESP32, a tiny camera and MediaPipe running 468 landmarks on-device. Total cost: eight dollars. This is what happens when one weekend hacker destroys a billion-dollar feature in a jacket pin. The hardware moat just evaporated. Full system in the video below.

Sonen Vidar levde bara i sex dagar. Enligt riktlinjerna skulle fostret ha övervakats kontinuerligt under förlossningen. Så skedde inte. Enligt sjukhuset i Lund: ”Bakomliggande faktorer bedöms vara hög arbetsbelastning, bristande följsamhet till rutiner samt bristande dokumentation.” Nedskärningar i sjukvården bakom ytterligare ett dödsfall? Frågan finns hos mamman: ”Hade Vidar överlevt om de haft en bra bemanning?” Det är valår. Ingen politiker vill väl då prata om Vidar? Ingen vill ta ansvar för patienter som skadas, felbehandlas eller dör som följd av nedskärningar på vårdpersonalen. Allra minst Carl Johan Sonesson (m). Han har precis vaskat 3,5 miljarder kronor på ett journalsystem som efter 10 år inte går att använda. Politiker som slösar skattepengar på byråkrati, misslyckade journalsystem och ”konst” istället för att investera i bemanning av vårdpersonal på golvet är cancern som måste opereras bort från sjukvården.

@Nils_Littorin Sorligt

@hanifbali @JohanForssell Globalister

@MattiasWidell Ska självalt sterila (utan barn) verkligen ha rösträtt?

I will not adopt Digital ID I will not use a Carbon Wallet I will not accept CBDC I will not adopt an internal passport I will not allow my documents to be tokenized I will not surrender my privacy for artificial safety I will not drive a car with a kill switch I will not abandon physical media I will not submit to a social credit system I will not surrender national sovereighty I will not surrender bodily autonomy