CELEBEX @CELE8EX

Our boy got more than 100k views just in 2 days. So, dead internet?

Will he go viral?

Every reaction in this clip is real. None of them is to him. The vendors, the guy who stops mid-sentence, the woman in green dancing beside him all saw someone else: a woman who actually walked that street on september 24. We swapped her out for 90 credits. The street did the work. He was added on a laptop. Swag or flex? So: percival pink.

This morning we said views are free now. By dinner we had one of these. Four clips, 93 picsart credits, the lagos guy's walk, our guy on top. No actor, no rate card, no lawyers. Every brand will have one by Friday. What nobody can make by friday is a person the audience already knows. That is the list we keep. He has no name yet. replies decide.

@DobrakB @Shtihmas11 AHAHAHAHAHAH

Views just became free. This is what free looks like. Jean phil is a character sheet swapped into a real video. 228k followers in two weeks, 5.4m views on his best post, no rate card. The ginger next to him is a copy. The only thing he has shipped is that token. His update from sep 29: "working very closely with my lawyers. we're reviewing the different proposals." Which leaves one thing a brand still has to pay for: a person. A name that signs, a price on the page, 40 posts you can read before you wire anything. oui madame.

A frenchman who does not exist did 5.4M views on one clip. This month every brand gets pitched its own one. Before you pay for it: the whole method is one tweet. Simone Canciello's thread (6M views) spells it out. Pinterest photo -> chatgpt character sheet -> swap him into a viral TikTok. He says don't buy the $299 course. what did jean phil's 5.4M views sell? his bio is a solana:GTBxUiw6wJdmmkCGZgRHLyYxqu1vG4KtRpeox6yDpump contract address. A character is free now. A person whose followers know their name is not. We list the second kind.

@theSethian Power of Influencers, fool the Berine

Bernie Sanders just quote-tweeted a product launch we ran creators for. Tavus shipped Griffin on Thursday: an AI on a live video call that 48% of people took for a human. Our creators got on calls with it and posted the recordings while the launch post climbed past 19M views. 28 hours later the senate's loudest AI doomer QRTs it to 250k people: "That is INSANE. PAUSE AI NOW." Nobody paid him. That's the point. A launch goes viral when it gives strangers a reason to argue. Creator seeding only makes sure enough strangers see it on day one.

@martynov014 Agree it was fun enough

@morpphhhaw AI psychosis

@hammertime_one Celebex marketing 🤌

Imagine pitching fake engagement to the people who build on X and earning with X. Do not bite the hand that tried to feed you 💀

@jakobgreenfeld never sick. never quits. always cringe.

@DmitroCP May I order big bucket cooked in lava? Thanks.

@Picsart: "credits are unlimited btw for the campaign" Me:

3M views on one X article. That's @0x_fokki, and it's the second time he's done it. "I told AI to stop being creative" is at 2.99M. His July piece did 5.6M. Amazing work and results. He tests every tool on camera before before writes a word about it, and he's still in the replies days later answering how he did it. Book him directly: celebex.notpeople.ai/celebs/0x-fokk… Running something bigger than one post? We plan campaigns across 300+ creators like him, brief them, and report every number back to you.

Fokki @0x_fokki

4 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2099…

16 10 128 3.3M 261

X paid one creator today about $213 per million impressions. that's the creator's cut of X's ad money, and advertisers paid X more than that. Brands buying posts from creators directly pay a lot more. 200 creators in our catalogue: median cheapest post $100 at a median 3,500 views. roughly $23,000 per million views. The clip lands in the same range from youtube: $15 to $50 per thousand views. If your plan is a payout screenshot, you're taking the smallest cut on the table. write a rate card.

Elon at the G20 on september 1: "everyone who's anyone in AI posts on X. that's how I get my news." That sentence is why an AI post and a gaming post with the same million views pay differently. Advertisers buying the AI topic are paying for the room Elon just described. A creator's payout is a share of that money. In our 13-creator sample the account with 8.6M views landed at the bottom of the payout table. The topic did that. Before you pick a niche, check who's already buying ads in it. The buyers were there before you posted.

@adgirlMM built a paid subscription community on X. This week she shut it down. Her reasons, in her words: the new program rewards original posts served to verified users, about 5% of her following. And creators are now forced onto X Money for payouts. She's "done trying to do it as a paid creator on X." The same week: joint X Money accounts launched, the virtual visa works from an iphone wallet, a memecoin launchpad started routing token fees to X handles, and per @UsePaid Grok's handle got an $8,202 payout. The clip is Firstpost on the same contradiction: money won't matter in ten years, but until then link your bank account. A handle now holds a balance. Some creators only wanted a page.