Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader ...whose results validate a set of overlapping theories about how the universe arounds us works. It's the experimental results that validate things *and we can replicate them*. We can see them for ourselves. That's the important part.

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader Yeah, the "kinda" doesn't help you because you're not even describing either science or science textbooks correctly. It's not that the textbooks validate each other, it's that they describe experiments (that can be replicated)...

1 0 0 12 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@cindicheever @EricTrump That you listen to a pastor that lies to you? Pretty pathetic.

0 1 6 83 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader You are though. You're not viewing the books in question as simply text but as something fundamental to being Christian. That can't matter in a proof of your deity's existence unless the text isn't the proof (and that's the opposite of your original claim).

0 0 0 5 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader You seem to be indicating that the beliefs of the people reading the books is relevant and I gotta tell you that doesn't work.

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader That doesn't answer my question. If you believe the Bible proves the existence of your deity because the books validate each other but it has to be the 66 books plus the Apocrypha because the 66 books aren't sufficient to prove that God exists, then the 7 extra books are the key.

2 0 0 23 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader My question to you is what text exactly in those seven books make the difference?

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

Rob the Blue Mage @Blue_Mage

2 days ago

@xeliotrop @b115911 @SirSicCrusader I ain't listenin' to any of 'em given that I was baptized as an Anglican and have been agnostic for several decades. Doesn't change the fact that your logic is wrong.