So Steve thinks that no theory of knowledge requires "evidence"... The problem is that whole thesis in epistemology called "EVIDENTIALISM". You know, the system that defines knowledge through JTB, a definition of knowledge referenced by Steve all the time. @zo7vette
6
3
10
0
1
Download Image
The problem is that Steve could say he subscribes to Reliablism, to skirt around the need for evidence, except when he gave his talk on Agnostic Epistemology, he never mentioned Reliablism at all.
@BartsBlack Was my response to SJ a strawman argument?
@BartsBlack @zo7vette I wonder if that one was reviewed by Landon. I wonder what Ozy and Alex Malpass would say. Man, I'm in recovery mode after these big ideas.