1/5 To clarify, $PMT $PMET strip ratio of 6 is similar to $LTR so when looked at on this basis alone isn't bad. However, the block model (which largely determines the s/r) looks less than ideal for 2 reasons: a) Steeply dipping pegmatites b) Higher grades deeper in the pit
1/5 To clarify, $PMT $PMET strip ratio of 6 is similar to $LTR so when looked at on this basis alone isn't bad. However, the block model (which largely determines the s/r) looks less than ideal for 2 reasons: a) Steeply dipping pegmatites b) Higher grades deeper in the pit
2/5 Steeply dipping pegs mean that the pit "width" is required to be wider to encapsulate all the ore. A pit >3km long, >600m wide is very large, and in an area surrounded by water bodies, the threat of flooding seems like a real risk: x.com/thunder54_hc/s… $PMT $PMET
@AsxMaverick7 Hi. now do the same for $WR1.ax IMO better prerequisites + no lakes.
@AsxMaverick7 thanks for sharing. what are your thoughts on the development capex for $PMT? It is 800m and so far upgraded 4 times.
@AsxMaverick7 LTR comp is rubbish as the majority is UG. LLL is the best I've seen at 3.3:1, PLS is 4.9:1, PMT at 6 is quite good. Atlantic is 8:1, Sigma is 16:1 and Core is 21:1 plus UG.