Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

Crypto enthused Joined February 2018

Tweets

4K
Followers

5K
Following

5K
Likes

10K

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 weeks ago

@shaunmmaguire It’s going to continue this way and eventually head towards amending the constitution to give even more teeth to socialist policies. Our hyper capitalistic wall street types don’t understand how they themselves are accelerating this ideological shift.

0 0 4 4K 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 weeks ago

@nvidia Get a new PR person. It’s dumb to compare to national usage. Compare it to the local area the data centers are located in and ruining the water supply of those communities.

0 0 144 6K 2

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@claudeai Claude Opus 4.7 feeling lazier, more verbose & error-prone than 4.6 is giving me serious GPT-5 vs 4o flashbacks 😩

0 0 0 55 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@smaxor Same experience used 4.7 for 2 days noticed it took longer and i was getting frustrated. Went back to using 4.6z. It just works for what I’m doing and getting what I want done more quickly.

0 0 1 189 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@claudeai Claude 4.7 stalls or gets lost in trains of thought way too often on what would be simiple tasks and I have to "stop" it and refocus it.

0 0 1 57 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@imPenny2x There’s a chance for that (it’s not a given) also getting to that future will be a very bumpy road. For those at the end of the tunnel there’s ur vision, possibly.

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@claudeai Claude 4.7 is still incredibly frustrating to use for normies when trying to iterate a design. Still lacks understanding of what you want or how to fix with too many required iterations on too many things.

0 0 1 67 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@claudeai In 4.6 you could read what Claude was "thinking" in cowork. That's gone in 4.7 why?

0 0 3 126 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

I've seen an ad on Amazon that has some "resemblance" of me and I'm wondering if they're now "making ads" more personal this way. Anyone else experience this? Giving me Black Mirror vibes.

2 0 11 153 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@Polymarket Artemis II reviewers on Booking.com gave their stay a 3/10 noting the views are beautiful but the bathroom smell is disgusting.

1 1 1 241 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@21shares_us Good point. Everything would appear to be at risk

1 0 2 14 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

3 months ago

@TVNewsNow Hmmm $2 mill for passage or $2 mill to be shot at w/ a chance of passage. 🤔

7 1 108 4K 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

What if rising AI & robotics-driven unemployment sparks widespread unrest? A dark but plausible theory: governments facing mass job loss and growing protests might use multiple levers to maintain control — including military recruitment, diversionary conflicts, and robotic policing. Pure speculation, but rooted in historical patterns of power preservation. Step 1: Broaden military enlistment. Raising the max age to 42 (as the U.S. Army just did) pulls in more able-bodied adults — especially those in their late 30s/early 40s hit by AI displacement. In a crisis, this could quietly reduce the pool of potential protesters at home while framing it as "national service." Step 2: Escalate external conflicts or reinstate elements of a draft. If protests turn destructive, a diversionary war (or heightened military posture) could redirect anger outward and "export" younger, frustrated workers overseas. History shows desperate regimes have tried similar tactics to buy time and create a "rally around the flag" effect — even when past attempts backfired. Step 3: Deploy AI & robotic systems for domestic order. As human police are stretched thin (or sent abroad), robots and autonomous systems could handle crowd control, asset protection, and surveillance. Current tech is mostly remote-operated and non-lethal, but in a severe breakdown, escalation rules would apply. The grim trade-off: If protesters begin destroying critical infrastructure, AI data centers, government systems, or threatening officials, security forces — human or robotic — face a binary choice: Protect lives, property, and assets… or stand down. Rules of engagement almost always authorize lethal force when there's imminent threat. Fewer able-bodied people on the streets (due to war/draft) could mean fewer direct confrontations with robotic units — potentially reducing the number of lethal incidents and the resulting public blowback. A cold calculus: minimize visible chaos at home while preserving core power structures. This remains a hypothetical worst-case scenario. Governments do plan for multiple futures — including ugly ones involving tech-driven unemployment and civil disorder. Whether they’d ever chain these tools together this way is unknown. History shows power rarely surrenders gracefully. Human nature + advanced tech could create dangerous new combinations.

0 0 0 565 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@arcprize

1 5 101 5K 4

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@TMZ Heaven has a new bouncer.

0 0 0 14 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

I get the point but he's oversimplifying what the AI systems have done with Chess and what they will do with coding/software. First, chess hasn't been "solved". Just all the ai systems are way above a human's ability. There's ongoing improved chess ai systems. Stockfish 18 which is better than each of it's prior generations and Google's Alphazero etc. When you watch a game you don't even understand the reasons for some of the moves even studying while it's happening. Only in hindsight is there a better understanding (sometimes). Solving means there's a definite answer. Yet these systems beat each other in games many times. Also Chess is confined to the rules. Perhaps coding in some languages could be "solved." But AI can create new languages and codebases and doesn't have to be confined to the ones we created. This makes it infinitely more vast than what is limited in Chess. Not only will it be way better than what humans can do at the things we understand it will also create things we cannot understand.

0 0 0 131 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@DaveShapi Even when you pay you're the product. There's no practical way to escape it.

0 0 0 18 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@Birdyword NY and CA duking it out for most mismanaged/corrupt State. CA wanted to build housing for the homeless and it was gonna coat $500k per unit (this was in 2018) kcrw.com/stories/should…

0 0 0 281 0

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@WallStreetApes For those interested in the full quote youtu.be/o69BiOqY1Ec?si… at 1:28:03

0 1 6 2K 3

View Details

Anonymeth.eth🍌 🦇🔊 @ApedInCrypto

4 months ago

@newlooklurker @cremieuxrecueil The average person being told their BMI is high doesn't change their habits either. Unfortunately, the average person being told they have Diabetes or Hypertension also do not change their habits. Changing a habit is difficult.