Jen Morgan @AlbaUnda

@30GotNext x.com/lfctransferroo…

LFC Transfer Room @LFCTransferRoom

2 years ago

Virgil Van Dijk x Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg 😮‍💨

22 473 4K 274K 272

@SamueILFC Same🤝

@RohanLawPC 😂same. In other words, y’all will be fine. Stick together and have fun.

Amen!

Josh Chavis @JoshChavis65

3 days ago

So far this World Cup has been a great reminder that we make too many assumptions about one another, and that the vast majority of humanity is awesome. It's been pretty damn refreshing, honestly.

76 1K 13K 1.1M 342

I told you they were coming for the Roadless Rule. Yesterday, Republicans made their move — and they hid it inside a wildfire bill. Here's what makes this so enraging: 59 million acres of America's wildest national forests are now on the table. The 2001 Roadless Rule has protected nearly 60 million acres across 39 states for 25 years. No logging. No road construction. No drilling. No mining. Built after 1.6 million Americans showed up — at 430 public hearings nationwide — to demand it. What lives here: bald eagles, elk, black bears, Cerulean warblers, marbled murrelets. Species that need large, intact, unfragmented habitat to survive. For many of them, roadless forests aren't just home — they're the last places left. What the amendment does: guts the rule. Opens the backcountry to logging and road construction under the cover of "fire prevention." The administration is pursuing repeal through the executive branch at the same time. And unlike the original rule — they aren't holding a single public hearing. 1.6 million people showed up to protect these forests. The administration isn't asking anyone this time. What do you call a wildfire bill that opens forests instead of protecting them? #DemsUnited

Mientras el negocio del fútbol sigue creciendo a pasos agigantados, Telemundo decidió defender algo que cada vez parece más escaso: la esencia del juego. ⚽❤️ Durante la transmisión del partido entre Canadá 🇨🇦 y Bosnia 🇧🇦, uno de sus comentaristas lanzó un mensaje que no pasó desapercibido: 🗣️ “Somos una de las pocas cadenas en el mundo que NO muestra anuncios durante las pausas de hidratación de la Copa Mundial. Preferimos el estilo de la vieja escuela. Deberíamos poder ver lo que hacen los jugadores. Mostramos a los aficionados, a la gente disfrutando, no la dirección corporativa del fútbol”. En una época donde cada segundo de transmisión parece estar en venta, la cadena estadounidense apuesta por mostrar lo que ocurre dentro y alrededor de la cancha.

Ian Wright is an absolute hero for saying how we all feel about this World Cup… “I've just read that the Somalian referee has been denied entry. Every few hours it's another story, another story about fans denied, players denied, officials denied, journalists denied, now refs," Wright said. "You know something I'm laughing but it's not funny, it's actually not funny and something has to be said. "The expensive tickets, the most expensive tickets ever, expensive accommodation, transport through the roof. It has to be said. "Is this how the hosts behave really for the greatest game, the greatest tournament in the world, is this how the hosts behave? "Are we not hearing more? Are we seeing how Qatar got dragged, are we not hearing more? Is this the spirit of football, really? "You know who I feel for? I feel for the American fans who are desperate for this, American soccer fans who are desperate for this, how embarrassed they must be. How embarrassing for them this must be. "This is the World Cup, this is a World Cup of chaos. Whoever wins this World Cup is going to have to go through some serious chaos to get this done. "I hope we can do it, but something has to be said now. This is the World Cup."

If the Senate is voting for shit at 4am you can bet it’s shady as fuck.

@LFCJapan これ、すごく気に入っています！

@OLSCKansasCity we arrived in KC today and our first stop was the @ChickenNPickle

@COYSeminoles Small club mentality 🤷🏼‍♀️

@thamieverywhere Well said. Thank you!

@theskiff13 🍻

Historian of slavery here the Pope is single handedly showing us the best of America in these very troubling times and needed on the 250th of the republic, to see the virtues that made the U.S. admired all over the world, the ability to admit a mistake.

The Associated Press @AP

3 weeks ago

BREAKING: Pope Leo XIV makes historic apology for Holy See's own role in legitimizing slavery and for failing to condemn it for centuries. apnews.com/article/pope-a…

1K 16K 70K 3.8M 5K

the pope and anthropic's co-founder just stood together at the vatican to release "magnifica humanitas," the first ever catholic teaching on AI yes, you read that right. the full ceremony was 2 hours. here's the most interesting things for you to know: 1. this is the biggest religious response to AI in history. popes only put out a handful of these huge official letters in their entire time as pope. the fact that one of them is about AI tells you how seriously the church is taking what's coming. 2. small detail with massive meaning: this pope picked the name "leo XIV" on purpose. the last pope named leo was leo XIII back in 1891, and his most famous act was writing the church's response to the industrial revolution. picking the same name is a deliberate signal. this pope sees AI as the new industrial revolution. 3. the catholic church does this every time a major technology reshapes humanity. they wrote "rerum novarum" in 1891 to respond to the industrial revolution. when nuclear weapons threatened the world in the 1960s, they wrote "pacem in terris." climate change and runaway tech got "laudato si" in 2015. now AI gets "magnifica humanitas." they don't issue these often. 4. the pope's main line: "AI needs to be disarmed." he literally compared AI to nuclear weapons. he said the church spent decades pushing for nuclear disarmament because the technology was too dangerous to leave in the hands of a few. he says AI is now in that same category. 5. anthropic co-founder christopher olah told the pope, on stage at the vatican, that anthropic's own research team keeps finding things inside their AI models that "mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." 6. olah's reframe of what AI actually is: these things are grown. they're trained on a structure roughly modeled after the human brain and fed everything humans have ever written. in his own words: "they are made from us, from our words." he said even the people building them don't fully understand what's happening inside. 7. olah publicly admitted that every AI lab, including his own, faces pressure that can conflict with doing the right thing. commercial pressure to keep shipping, competitive pressure from other labs, plus the older pressures of pride and ambition. his solution: we desperately need outside critics with no skin in the game who will tell the labs when they're failing. 8. olah says there are 3 giant questions the AI labs cannot answer alone and the world needs religion and philosophy to step in on: > how do we make sure poor countries actually benefit from AI? > what does human flourishing even look like in this new world? > and what are these things we're actually building? 9. one of the sharpest lines in the whole encyclical: "the promise of automatic general prosperity often proves illusory." translation: the idea that AI will just make everyone rich on its own is a fantasy. someone has to actually design the system so the benefits get shared. 10. the pope also pulled out a 100-year-old quote: "contemporary man has not been trained to use power well." said by a theologian back in the 1920s. the whole encyclical is basically a long argument that we need to learn how to use this kind of power before it uses us. 11. the pope kept stressing that he doesn't have the technical answers. but he says the church has thousands of years of wisdom on what it means to be human, and that wisdom is exactly what's missing from how we're building AI right now. his closing line: this technology should serve "human flourishing and human dignity, not control consciences."

@necowilliams Proud of you!!! YNWA

@Velobet_Boss @SkySportsPL We’ve been blessed to be supporters during this era for these men.

Putin didn't invade Ukraine because of NATO. He invaded because Ukrainians were proving democracy works. Historian and Pulitzer Prize winner Anne Applebaum puts it plainly: Putin looked at Ukraine's democratic movement and thought, "If they can do it in Ukraine, then people could do it in Russia. So I need to crush this." That's the real threat Ukraine posed. Not missiles. Not borders. A working democracy next door. Applebaum frames the war as a fault line between the democratic and autocratic worlds. Russia isn't just trying to take territory. It's trying to erase Ukraine as a nation, reduce it to a colony, and send a message to every country that the post-1945 rules of Europe no longer apply. Those rules were simple: no invasions, no wars, borders don't change by force. Russia understood exactly what it was breaking when it crossed into Ukraine.

@niuman___ @DmcKlyne @desigotdone Not quite. They didn’t start participating until the 1970s. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_in…