Rep. LaMalfa: How many people were harmed because they weren't allowed this early treatment because it was politicized? (The head of the FDA said ‘there's no benefit of ivermectin in the treatment of covid.’)
Rep. LaMalfa raises a valid concern about the politicization of early treatments for COVID-19 and its potential impact on public health. The statement from the head of the FDA regarding ivermectin underscores the need for evidence-based decision-making in healthcare, while also acknowledging the importance of considering all available options. It's crucial for policymakers and health authorities to prioritize the well-being of individuals by ensuring access to effective treatments and by fostering a transparent and science-driven approach to managing the pandemic.
@Acyn Love it 🇺🇸 x.com/amelia7no/stat…
@Acyn I’m embarrassed that he “represents” me in Congress. 🤦♀️
@Acyn It's important to understand that Ivermectin is used for farm animals and is not designed or intended for human use. Any individual who prescribes or takes it runs the risk of causing serious consequences related to the side effects. This is why we have regulations.
@Acyn Unless those people had scabies or some other parasitic infection, ivermectin didn’t do squat for them may have even been harmful
@Acyn #MAGACultMoron #HouseRepublicans Also LaMalfa: "LaMalfa has said, "The climate of the globe has been fluctuating since God created it", and that the Book of Genesis disproves the scientific consensus on climate change, which he has called "bad science" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_LaMa…
@Acyn They're still going on about this? How many Rethuglicans invested in Ivermectin?