Fox @2fox36

اعرف أحد الفضلاء لديه ذاكرة حفظ قوية، وقدرة عجيبة على استيعاب المعلومات واسترجاعها في أي وقت يريد.. عندما سألته عن السر ذكر لي أنه يمارس طريقة مشابهة للطريقة التي تحدث عنها "جوردن بيترسون" في هذا المقطع:

A broke Italian gambler in 1560 wrote a short manual on how to win at dice. Nobody in finance read it for four hundred years. The nine-trillion-dollar insurance industry runs on his equation. His name was Girolamo Cardano. The book was called Liber de Ludo Aleae. He scribbled it in Milan to settle a card debt. Every dollar of premium ever collected on Earth is a footnote to that scribble. Nobody connected the dots until 1996. A ninety-year-old man in New York wrote a book called Against the Gods and traced every modern risk model back to Cardano's manual. Wall Street called him the historian of risk. His name was Peter Bernstein. In 2008 a small production company filmed him for thirteen minutes. He walked through the entire five-hundred-year arc. Cardano to Pascal to Fermat to Black-Scholes. Then he stopped and said the industry had built glass towers on the back of an idea a broke gambler scribbled to shave the house edge. He died the following summer. Age ninety. There are only four ways to make money. Labor. Capital. Arbitrage. Insurance. Insurance is the oldest and the least visible. Every actuary on Earth still prices catastrophe risk with Cardano's framework. The video is thirteen minutes long. Free on YouTube. Twenty-nine thousand people have watched it.

Superior @andreysuperior

4 weeks ago

x.com/i/article/2087…

156 810 5K 12.4M 15K

@Zorroo_2002 @URakan1122 🤣🤣🤣

@URakan1122 بيئة تويتر طاردة

@khaledbt1 ام الدنيا ولادة

Business Lessons I wish someone had told me at the beginning 1. Sell what is selling, not what you want to sell 2. Charge high - rich clients act and pay better 3. Never do discounts on your service 4. Never work for free (testimonial if new) 5. Ignore unsuccesful friends and family 6. Hire talented people, the chance of you fixing a loser with a sob story is highly unlikely 7. If one potential client can't afford your service, the next one will, the world is full of abundance 8. Scarcity mindset will cage your income potential 9. Copy people that have made it, your ideas probably suck, just copy what works 10. The bar is 30 feet lower than what you think it is, the bar is way lower in reality than in your mind 11. Most people suck at what they do and still get paid 12. Saturation is a myth 13. Find a niche where dumb people are getting rich 14. Choose the simple money witb low risk 15. Cash flow over evertything 16. Ignore criticisms over your business niche, no matter what niche it is people will mock it somehow, just follow the money 17. You don't get ready by "getting ready" you get ready by doing

🚨 تأثير العوامل النفسية على تداولك بالأسواق الماليه يسلط الدكتور / ألكسندر ألدر بهذا اللقاء الضوء على كيفية تأثير العوامل النفسية مثل الخوف و الطمع و عدم اليقين على قرارات التداول و أداء المستثمرين في الأسواق المالية .. #السوق_الأمريكي #الذهب #الفوركس #عاجل_الآن #Tramp #البتكوين #BTC #الكويت #السعوديه_العظمى

The older you get, the more you realize luck is just exposure. If you sit in the same chair, same routine, talking to the same people, nothing new happens. You have to touch the world to win. Travel more. Talk to strangers. Try a new coffee spot. Post on social media. Start a side hustle. The world rewards motion. You don't find opportunity sitting still.

@AbdullahMashat ترجمته لكم x.com/slit_v/status/…

عايد @Slit_v

3 months ago

x.com/i/article/2068…

6 21 231 53K 424

@URakan1122 ياخي اللي عمل الفيديو ده فنان 😂😂

مسكين هو الرجل يتخبط بين هاذي وتِلك بحثاً عن طعم الحياةَ بالنهاية يكتشف ان كل مايفعله من تضحية وصدق ووفاء هو مجرد ضياعُ وقت خلاصة الكلام، الرجل لا يحب بل يتوهمُ ذلك، فالحب هو فقط لمن أتيت من صُلبه أو بطنها، ومن أتوا إلك من صُلبك. #غرد_كأنك_فيلسوف 😂

my friend in new york works as an analyst at a hedge fund and taught me more about risk management in one call than every trading course i ever bought he runs risk models for a $2B fund said retail traders use the word "risk management" but don't actually manage risk at all thought he was being dramatic until he showed me how his fund sizes positions vs how retail sizes positions the gap was embarrassing i asked for an example he pulled up his screen and walked me through their daily VAR report every position. every exposure. every correlation. every drawdown scenario modeled before a single dollar is deployed $50M positions sized to the third decimal place "you guys risk 1% per trade and think that's risk management. we risk 0.04% per position and call that aggressive" he broke it down: in a hedge fund, position sizing isn't a number you pick. it's a number that falls out of a model your max loss per position is dictated by your total portfolio drawdown limit, your correlation to existing positions, your liquidity profile, and your conviction score four variables. one output. no feelings involved the rule is simple no single position can put more than 0.5% of total portfolio AUM at risk no two correlated positions can combine to more than 0.75% no single sector can carry more than 4% total exposure the rules exist BEFORE the trade idea exists "but you guys are managing $2B. retail traders have $50K" "the math doesn't change because the account is smaller. risk management isn't about size. it's about a rule that exists before you click buy. retail traders make up the rule AS they click buy. that's not management. that's improvising" the gap is identical to amateur poker vs pro poker amateur poker player thinks pot odds are something you calculate when you're already in the hand pro poker player has pot odds memorized for every possible scenario before they even look at their cards the math is done. the decision is automatic. that's the difference he showed me how his analyst team thinks about a losing trade "we don't think about losing trades. we think about losing weeks. losing months. losing quarters. a single trade losing is a non-event. a single position taking us above our portfolio drawdown threshold IS the event. that's what we manage. you guys are managing the wrong unit" his system, ported to retail: no single trade can risk more than 0.5% of the account no two correlated trades (NQ and ES, both long for example) can combine to more than 1% open exposure no single session can result in more than 1% account drawdown - if you hit it, you stop trading for the day automatically no single week can result in more than 2% drawdown - if you hit it, you stop trading for the week the rules exist before the trade. you don't decide them in real time. you don't override them. you don't make exceptions for "high conviction" setups "the moment you override a written risk rule you stop being a trader and start being a gambler. doesn't matter how right you are about the setup" most traders set a 1% risk per trade and call it risk management that's like a poker player saying "i won't bet more than 1% of my chips on any hand" while taking 40 hands an hour with no other rules you sit at the table for 8 hours risking 1% per click = you're playing 40 hands a day at 1% each = your effective daily portfolio risk is 40% one bad day wipes you retail traders manage one number. institutions manage four position risk. correlation risk. session risk. weekly risk. four layers. one stack my career before i started using his framework: 14 funded accounts blown in 18 months. average loss per account: $4,200. average time to blow: 31 days each one started with "i had a 1% risk per trade rule" same edge i have today same setups same screen time the only thing that changed was the risk framework funded account number 15 lasted 11 months. funded account number 16 is still alive. so is 17. so is 18 the math is identical position risk × correlation risk × session risk × weekly risk = your real exposure if you don't multiply all four, you're not measuring your real risk you're measuring the smallest, most flattering number you can find and pretending that's risk management "the casino doesn't beat tourists because the tourists pick bad games. the casino beats tourists because tourists don't have a rule for when to leave the table. the market doesn't beat retail because retail picks bad setups. the market beats retail because retail doesn't have a rule for when to stop clicking" i checked the math after that dinner retail risk management: pick a per-trade number. ignore correlation. ignore session exposure. ignore weekly drawdown. trade until you blow up. call it variance institutional risk management: four rules written before the trade. multiplied together. capped at every layer. enforced automatically. blow-up rate near zero he's right it's not even close and he doesn't have to break a sweat to do it (DM "SYSTEM" for 1-on-1 coaching, I only take 1-2 traders at a time to work fully private with)

95% من اللي بيستخدموا أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي شغالين غلط وميعرفوش إنهم ملمسوش القدرات الحقيقية للـ AI لحد دلوقتي! 🚨 احفظ البوست ده عندك فوراً قبل ما يضيع منك. صانع Claude Code بنفسه لسه مطلع الأسرار المخفية في الكواليس، واللي بتنطبق على أي نموذج ذكاء اصطناعي بتستخدمه في شغلك وبتغير طريقة تفكيره تماماً قبل ما تكتب كلمة واحدة.. ارمي كل اللي تعرفه وركز هنا: 👇 في البودكاست ده، الراجل بيشرح بالتفصيل وبأرقام مرعبة ليه أغلبنا مابيعرفش يطوع نماذج الذكاء الاصطناعي صح (سواء شغال بـ Claude، أو ChatGPT، أو Gemini، وغيرهم): - خسارة الـ 14%: اللي بتضيع من كفاءة الشغل وسياق الـ Context لمجرد إنك مش مجهز ملفات التوجيه والـ System Prompts الأساسية قبل ما تكتب كلمة واحدة. - تغيير طريقة تفكير النموذج: ميزات وإعدادات خفية بتغير طريقة تحليل وتفكير الـ AI بالكامل وتخليه يفهم سياق مشروعك كأنه تيم كامل معاك بدل الإجابات السطحية. - إعدادات الـ 95%: ميزات و workflows كاملة ومتقدمة جداً مستخبية ورا زرار واحد (Toggle)، وحوالي 95% من المستخدمين عمرهم ما فتحوها في الأدوات اللي بيشتغلوا بيها! نصيحة من الأخِر: بدل ما تضيع سهرتك النهاردة في فرجة على حاجة عادية، شوف البودكاست ده.. لو بقالك فترة بتعتمد على الذكاء الاصطناعي ولسه مخرجتش بره شباك المحادثة والدردشة التقليدي، ففيه ميزات احترافية أنت لسه ملمستهمش! احفظه وشوفه حالاً عشان تقفل اللعبة وتفهم قوة الذكاء الاصطناعي الحقيقية رايحة فين. لايك وفولو واحفظ البوست عشان يوصلك كل جديد!

Khairallah AL-Awady @eng_khairallah1

4 months ago

x.com/i/article/2058…

34 65 327 565K 1K

This is Bruce Kovner. He borrowed $3,000 on a credit card and turned it into $80 million in 10 years. Here's his trading philosophy

@Charts_Venom HYPE AVAX SUI LINK HBAR ALGO الاكثر امانا

@URakan1122 يالبيه ماتبي شاعر ومغني يتوظف معك يابو سلطان😂😂؟

غير احد الاشخاص سوق العقار كامل. رجال صوّر بيت كامل بجواله. وبعدها رفعه على النت. احفظ الصفحة قبل تنسى. الأداة مفتوحة المصدر 100% على GitHub. بإمكان أي شخص في العالم التجول فيه افتراضيًا عبر الإنترنت بسهوله. لا تطبيق. لا نظارات VR. لا سمسار. لا حتى موعد. بنقرة واحدة، أنت في الداخل. كل غرفة، كل زاوية، كل ظل. صورة واقعية للغاية. الأرقام مذهلة: - عمولة الوكيل العقاري لمنزل قيمته 500 ألف دولار: فقط 15 ألف دولار - تكلفة المسح: حوالي 200 دولار - تقدر تلف على 50 بيت بيوم واحد وأنت جالس بمكتبك - حجم الملف: أصغر من مقطع فيديو على تيك توك التقنية المستخدمة: تُسمى هذه التقنية "3D Gaussian Splatting"، وهي تستخدم ملايين "البقع" الصغيرة المتوهجة من الألوان والعمق، بدلًا من المضلعات (كما في ألعاب الفيديو). يعيد الذكاء الاصطناعي بناء الواقع من صورك. تظهر النتيجة على هاتفك وكأنك هناك بالفعل. الفرصة سانحةٌ للربح أكثر من ذلك: يأخذ الفريلانسرز ما بين 300 و800 دولار أمريكي لكل عملية مسح ضوئي لصالح وكلاء العقارات، ومواقع تأجير الشقق عبر Airbnb، وقاعات المناسبات، وتجار السيارات، والمتاحف. شخص واحد + هاتف واحد + عطلة نهاية أسبوع واحدة = مشروع تجاري. مفتوح المصدر بالكامل. مبني على منصة PlayCanvas.

Khairallah AL-Awady @eng_khairallah1

4 months ago

x.com/i/article/2053…

50 106 760 1.4M 3K

overtrading is your 9-5 brain tricking you into thinking activity equals progress your entire life you were conditioned to believe more input = more output the more you study, the better grades you get the more work you do, the more money you earn in trading, that equation doesn’t work more trades don’t equal more profits, but more decisions and more decisions mean more room for error not being in a position is also a position you’re positioned not to lose money you have two jobs as a trader 1) generate profits 2) protect profits the 2nd doesn’t increase your PNL, but it determines whether the first one lasts doing is often the highest quality decision available rewire your brain activity doesn't equal productivity

@azizaljuaid79 العملات القوية والاساسية غير SOL-LTC-AVAX-SUI-DOGE واشباههم من باقي العملات

@OmarsMess1 تشوف 1 دولار ممكن ؟